scholarly journals Opportunities and challenges to improving antibiotic prescribing practices through a One Health approach: results of a comparative survey of doctors, dentists and veterinarians in Australia

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. e020439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annie Zhuo ◽  
Maurizio Labbate ◽  
Jacqueline M Norris ◽  
Gwendolyn L Gilbert ◽  
Michael P Ward ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Policy Development ◽  
One Health ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Appropriate Prescribing ◽  
Context Specific

ObjectivesTo explore and compare the knowledge, attitudes and experiences of doctors, dentists and veterinarians (as prescribers) in relation to antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance (AbR), and to consider the implications of these for policy-making that support a One Health approach.DesignA cross-sectional survey conducted online.SettingDoctors, dentists and veterinarians practising in primary, secondary or tertiary care in Australia.Participants547 doctors, 380 dentists and 403 veterinarians completed the survey.Main outcome measuresPrescribers’ knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of AbR, the extent to which a range of factors are perceived as barriers to appropriate prescribing practices, and perceived helpfulness of potential strategies to improve antibiotic prescribing in practice.ResultsThere was substantial agreement across prescriber groups that action on AbR is required by multiple sectors and stakeholders. However, prescribers externalised responsibility to some extent by seeing the roles of others as more important than their own in relation to AbR. There were common and context-specific barriers to optimal prescribing across the prescriber groups. Prescriber groups generally perceived restrictive policies as unhelpful to supporting appropriate prescribing in their practice.ConclusionsThe results have implications for implementing a One Health approach that involves doctors, dentists and veterinarians as key players to tackling the crisis of AbR. The findings are that (1) prescribers understand and are likely receptive to a One Health policy approach to AbR, (2) policy development should be sensitive to barriers that are specific to individual prescriber groups and (3) the development and introduction of interventions that might be perceived as reducing prescriber autonomy will need to be carefully designed and implemented.

scholarly journals Prescribers’ Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviors on Antibiotics, Antibiotic Use and Antibiotic Resistance in Jordan

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 858
Author(s):  
Reema A. Karasneh ◽  
Sayer I. Al-Azzam ◽  
Mera Ababneh ◽  
Ola Al-Azzeh ◽  
Ola B. Al-Batayneh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Online Questionnaire ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Attitudes And Behaviors ◽  
And Behaviors ◽  
Ease Of Access

More research is needed on the drivers of irrational antibiotic prescribing among healthcare professionals and to ensure effective prescribing and an adequate understanding of the issue of antibiotic resistance. This study aimed at evaluating prescribers’ knowledge, attitudes and behaviors about antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance. A cross-sectional study was conducted utilizing an online questionnaire and included physicians and dentists from all sectors in Jordan. A total of 613 prescribers were included (physicians n = 409, dentists n = 204). Respondents’ knowledge on effective use, unnecessary use or associated side effects of antibiotics was high (>90%), compared with their knowledge on the spread of antibiotic resistance (62.2%). For ease of access to the required guidelines on managing infections, and to materials that advise on prudent antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance, prescribers agreed in 62% and 46.1% of cases, respectively. 28.4% of respondents had prescribed antibiotics when they would have preferred not to do so more than once a day or more than once a week. Among respondents who prescribed antibiotics, 63.4% would never or rarely give out resources on prudent use of antibiotics for infections. The findings are of importance to inform antibiotic stewardships about relevant interventions aimed at changing prescribers’ behaviors and improving antibiotic prescribing practices.

scholarly journals A PROSPECTIVE STUDY ON ANTIMICROBIAL UTILIZATION PATTERN IN OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT AT TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL, PUNE, INDIA.

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
Sarang A Deshmukh ◽  
Yashasvi Agarwal ◽  
Harshita Hiran ◽  
Uma Bhosale
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Essential Medicine ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Oral Dosage ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Cross Sectional

 Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate antimicrobial prescription pattern in outpatient departments.Method: This was a prospective, cross-sectional and observational study over 12 weeks total 400 prescriptions of either gender and age; containing antimicrobial agents (AMAs) were analyzed for demographic data and the WHO prescribing indicators.Results: Most of prescription were given to men (n=262). The most common group of AMA used was Cephalosporins (n=141, 35.25%); of which Ceftriaxone was most commonly prescribed (n=73, 18.25%). 10 AMAs were from the WHO essential medicine list AMAs. Men outnumbered women in prescribing antibiotics (n=262 vs. 138). Most of AMAs receivers were between 26 and 35 years (n=128, 32%). Amoxicillin+Clavulanic acid fixed-dose combination was most common (n=84, 21%). Most of the prescriptions were containing four drugs per prescriptions (n=130, 32.5%). Only 10% of the prescription was given by generic name and rest 90% were given by brand name. Oral dosage form of AMAs was predominant (n=340, 85%). Vitamins and supplement were most common comedication received by patients.Conclusion: Antibiotic use was found to be reasonable and rational in most of the cases. However, still, prescribers should improve prescribing practices and make it more rational.

scholarly journals Young doctors’ perspectives on antibiotic use and resistance: a multinational and inter-specialty cross-sectional European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) survey

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (12) ◽  
pp. 3611-3618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bojana Beović ◽  
May Doušak ◽  
Céline Pulcini ◽  
Guillaume Béraud ◽  
Jose Ramon Paño Pardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Five Dimensions ◽  
And Gender

Abstract Background Postgraduate training has the potential to shape the prescribing practices of young doctors. Objectives To investigate the practices, attitudes and beliefs on antibiotic use and resistance in young doctors of different specialties. Methods We performed an international web-based exploratory survey. Principal component analysis (PCA) and bivariate and multivariate [analysis of variance (ANOVA)] analyses were used to investigate differences between young doctors according to their country of specialization, specialty, year of training and gender. Results Of the 2366 participants from France, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Slovenia and Spain, 54.2% of young doctors prescribed antibiotics predominantly as instructed by a mentor. Associations between the variability of answers and the country of training were observed across most questions, followed by variability according to the specialty. Very few differences were associated with the year of training and gender. PCA revealed five dimensions of antibiotic prescribing culture: self-assessment of knowledge, consideration of side effects, perception of prescription patterns, consideration of patient sickness and perception of antibiotic resistance. Only the country of specialization (partial η2 0.010–0.111) and the type of specialization (0.013–0.032) had a significant effect on all five identified dimensions (P < 0.01). The strongest effects were observed on self-assessed knowledge and in the perception of antibiotic resistance. Conclusions The country of specialization followed by the type of specialization are the most important determinants of young doctors’ perspectives on antibiotic use and resistance. The inclusion of competencies in antibiotic use in all specialty curricula and international harmonization of training should be considered.

scholarly journals Parental self-medication with antibiotics for children promotes antibiotic over-prescribing in clinical settings in China

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiayao Xu ◽  
Xiaomin Wang ◽  
Kai Sing Sun ◽  
Leesa Lin ◽  
Xudong Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Self Medication ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Prescribing Behavior ◽  
The Past ◽  
Outpatient Settings ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Self-medication with antibiotics (SMA) is one of the most dangerous inappropriate antibiotic use behaviors. This study aims to investigate the impact of parental SMA for children before a consultation on their doctor’s subsequent antibiotic prescribing behavior, including intravenous (IV) antibiotic use in the clinical setting of China. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted between June 2017 and April 2018 in three provinces of China. A total of 9526 parents with children aged 0–13 years were investigated. Data from 1275 parents who had self-medicated their children and then visited a doctor in the past month were extracted and analyzed. Results One-third (410) of the studied children had parental SMA before the consultation and 83.9% of them were subsequently prescribed antibiotics by doctors. Children with parental SMA were more likely to be prescribed antibiotics (aOR = 7.79, 95% CI [5.74–10.58]), including IV antibiotics (aOR = 3.05, 95% CI [2.27–4.11]), and both oral and IV antibiotics (aOR = 3.42, 95% CI [2.42–4.84]), than children without parental SMA. Parents with SMA behaviors were more likely to request antibiotics (aOR = 4.05, 95% CI [2.59–6.31]) including IV antibiotics (aOR = 2.58, 95% CI [1.40–4.76]), and be fulfilled by doctors (aOR = 3.22, 95% CI [1.20–8.63]). Conclusions Tailored health education for parents is required in both community and clinical settings to discourage parental SMA for children. The doctors should not prescribe unnecessary antibiotics to reinforce parents’ SMA behaviors. We recommend expanding the current IV antibiotics ban in outpatient settings of China to cover outpatient pediatrics.

Patient Knowledge and Experiences With Antibiotic Use and Delayed Antibiotic Prescribing in the Outpatient Setting

2019 ◽  
pp. 089719001988942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Beth A. Seipel ◽  
Emily S. Prohaska ◽  
Janelle F. Ruisinger ◽  
Brittany L. Melton
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
General Public ◽  
Community Pharmacists ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Patient Knowledge ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Cross Sectional

Background: Most antibiotic prescriptions originate in the outpatient setting and an estimated 30% are unnecessary. Pharmacists are well positioned to positively impact antibiotic prescribing habits; the role of the community pharmacist in outpatient antibiotic stewardship programs is not well defined. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to (1) assess the knowledge of the general public regarding appropriate antibiotic use, and (2) assess the experiences of the general public regarding delayed antibiotic prescriptions. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was administered at community pharmacies in Kansas from September 2018 to January 2019. Eligible individuals were older than 18 years and self-reported their ability to speak and read English. The 22-item survey collected demographics, knowledge regarding appropriate antibiotic use, and participant understanding and experiences of delayed antibiotic prescribing. Descriptive statistics assessed demographics and chi-square compared responses between demographics. Results: Of 347 surveys completed, respondents were mainly Caucasian (91.6%), female (58.2%), and aged 60 years or older (59.1%). Those with high school education or below were more likely to believe antibiotics kill viruses (43.1% vs 20.9%, respectively; p < 0.01) and that antibiotics work on most coughs and colds (31.4% vs 16.2%, respectively; p = 0.01). Delayed antibiotic prescriptions were more frequently offered to those who had received an antibiotic prescription in the last year compared to those who had not (36.1% vs 15%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Gaps in patient knowledge about appropriate antibiotic use and delayed prescribing present an opportunity for community pharmacists to educate patients and become involved in outpatient antibiotic stewardship.

scholarly journals Validity of World Health Organisation prescribing indicators in Namibia’s primary healthcare: findings and implications

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 338-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q Niaz ◽  
B Godman ◽  
A Massele ◽  
S Campbell ◽  
A Kurdi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ambulatory Care ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Survey Design ◽  
World Health ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Medicine Use ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Significant Independent Risk Factor

Abstract Objective World Health Organization/International Network of Rational use of Drugs (WHO/INRUD) indicators are widely used to assess medicine use. However, there is limited evidence on their validity in Namibia’s primary health care (PHC) to assess the quality of prescribing. Consequently, our aim was to address this. Design, setting, participants and interventions An analytical cross-sectional survey design was used to examine and validate WHO/INRUD indicators in out-patient units of two PHC facilities and one hospital in Namibia from 1 February 2015 to 31 July 2015. The validity of the indicators was determined using two-by-two tables against compliance to the Namibian standard treatment guidelines (NSTG). The receiver operator characteristics for the WHO/INRUD indicators were plotted to determine their accuracy as predictors of compliance to agreed standards. A multivariate logistic model was constructed to independently determine the prediction of each indicator. Main outcomes and results Out of 1243 prescriptions; compliance to NSTG prescribing in ambulatory care was sub-optimal (target was >80%). Three of the four WHO/INRUD indicators did not meet Namibian or WHO targets: antibiotic prescribing, average number of medicines per prescription and generic prescribing. The majority of the indicators had low sensitivity and/or specificity. All WHO/INRUD indicators had poor accuracy in predicting rational prescribing. The antibiotic prescribing indicator was the only covariate that was a significant independent risk factor for compliance to NSTGs. Conclusion WHO/INRUD indicators showed poor accuracy in assessing prescribing practices in ambulatory care in Namibia. There is need for appropriate models and/or criteria to optimize medicine use in ambulatory care in the future.

scholarly journals Identifying antibiotic prescribing patterns through multi-level latent profile analyses: a cross-sectional survey of primary care physicians in Hubei of China

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Wang ◽  
Chaojie Liu ◽  
Xinping Zhang ◽  
Chenxi Liu
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Broad Spectrum ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Latent Profile Analyses ◽  
Broad Spectrum Antibiotics

Abstract Background Overuse of antibiotics significantly fuels the development of AMR, which threating the global population health. Great variations existed in antibiotic prescribing practices among physicians, indicating improvement potential for rational use of antibiotics. This study aims to identify antibiotic prescribing patterns of primary care physicians and potential determinants. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 551 physicians from 67 primary care facilities in Hubei selected through random cluster sampling, tapping into their knowledge, attitudes and prescribing practices toward antibiotics. Prescriptions (n=501,072) made by the participants from 1 January to 31 March 2018 were extracted from the medical records system. Seven indicators were calculated for each prescriber: average number of medicines per prescription, average number of antibiotics per prescription, percentage of prescriptions containing antibiotics, percentage of antibiotic prescriptions containing broad-spectrum antibiotics, percentage of antibiotic prescriptions containing parenteral administered antibiotics, percentage of antibiotic prescriptions containing restricted antibiotics, and percentage of antibiotic prescriptions containing antibiotics included in the WHO “Watch and Reserve” list. Two-level latent profile analyses were performed to identify the antibiotic prescribing patterns of physicians based on those indicators. Multi-nominal logistic regression models were established to identify determinants with the antibiotic prescribing patterns. Results On average, each primary care physician issued 909 (ranging from 100 to 11941 with a median of 474) prescriptions over the study period. The mean percentage of prescriptions containing antibiotics issued by the physicians reached 52.19% (SD=17.20%). Of those antibiotic prescriptions, an average of 82.29% (SD=15.83%) contained broad-spectrum antibiotics; 71.92% (SD=21.42%) contained parenteral administered antibiotics; 23.52% (SD=19.12%) contained antibiotics restricted by the regional government; and 67.74% (SD=20.98%) contained antibiotics listed in the WHO “Watch and Reserve” list. About 28.49% of the prescribers were identified as low antibiotic users, compared with 51.18% medium users and 20.33% high users. Higher use of antibiotics was associated with insufficient knowledge, indifference to changes, complacency with satisfied patients, low household income and rural location of the prescribers. Conclusion Great variation in antibiotic prescribing patterns exists among primary care physicians in Hubei of China. High use of antibiotics is not only associated with knowledge shortfalls but also low socioeconomic status of prescribers.

scholarly journals Assessment of Rational Antibiotic Prescribing in Public Hospitals in Nasarawa State, Nigeria

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rejoice Abimiku Helma ◽  
Yakubu Boyi Ngwai ◽  
Istifanus Haruna Nkene ◽  
Sabiu Adamu
Keyword(s):  
International Development ◽  
Essential Medicine ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antimicrobial Treatment ◽  
Public Hospitals ◽  
World Health ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Prescribing Indicators

Antibiotics are the most commonly used medicines in healthcare facilities globally; and they are often misused, especially in developing countries. Periodic assessment of antibiotic prescribing practices is essential to improve prescribing standards and ensure rational use. A cross-sectional, retrospective evaluation of antibiotic prescribing in public secondary and tertiary hospitals in Nasarawa State, Nigeria was carried out. A total of 2800 case sheets of patients who accessed the hospitals under review during the period 2008-2018 were randomly sampled and evaluated. Prescribing indicators of World Health Organization (WHO) and Strengthening Pharmaceutical System/United States Agency for International Development (SPS/USAID) were evaluated and compared with published standards for each of the indicators to identify irrational antibiotic use. Percentage of hospitalization with one or more antimicrobials prescribed was 75.6%. Average number of antimicrobials prescribed per hospitalization in which antibiotics were used was 1.75±0.66. Percentage of antibiotic prescribed consistent with hospital formulary was 100.0%. Average duration of prescribed antimicrobial treatment was 5.57±2.42 days. Percentage of antimicrobials prescribed by generic name was 45.8%. Percentage of injectable antibiotic used was 36.4%. Percentage of antimicrobials prescribed from the national essential medicine list was 85.7%. Average encounter with antibiotic was 0.82±0.2. Many of the prescribing indicators deviated from the WHO or SPS/USAID optimal values; and thus, were predictors of irrational antibiotic prescribing. Continuous education and re-training of prescribers in public hospitals in Nasarawa State to comply with approved standards of prescribing should be emphasized in to ensure rational antibiotic use.

scholarly journals Management of Common Infections in German Primary Care: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Knowledge and Confidence among General Practitioners and Outpatient Pediatricians

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1131
Author(s):  
Peter Konstantin Kurotschka ◽  
Elena Tiedemann ◽  
Dominik Wolf ◽  
Nicola Thier ◽  
Johannes Forster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Educational Interventions ◽  
Treatment Decisions ◽  
Antimicrobial Treatment ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional

Outpatient antibiotic use is closely related to antimicrobial resistance and in Germany, almost 70% of antibiotic prescriptions in human health are issued by primary care physicians (PCPs). The aim of this study was to explore PCPs, namely General Practitioners’ (GPs) and outpatient pediatricians’ (PDs) knowledge of guideline recommendations on rational antimicrobial treatment, the determinants of confidence in treatment decisions and the perceived need for training in this topic in a large sample of PCPs from southern Germany. Out of 3753 reachable PCPs, 1311 completed the survey (overall response rate = 34.9%). Knowledge of guideline recommendations and perceived confidence in making treatment decisions were high in both GPs and PDs. The two highest rated influencing factors on prescribing decisions were reported to be guideline recommendations and own clinical experiences, hence patients’ demands and expectations were judged as not influencing treatment decisions. The majority of physicians declared to have attended at least one specific training course on antibiotic use, yet almost all the participating PCPs declared to need more training on this topic. More studies are needed to explore how consultation-related and context-specific factors could influence antibiotic prescriptions in general and pediatric primary care in Germany beyond knowledge. Moreover, efforts should be undertaken to explore the training needs of PCPs in Germany, as this would serve the development of evidence-based educational interventions targeted to the improvement of antibiotic prescribing decisions rather than being focused solely on knowledge of guidelines.

scholarly journals Antibiotic Prescribing Practice in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital: Analysis Based on 2019 WHO AWaRe Classification

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahin Juveriya ◽  
Peddireddy Mounika ◽  
Mangalapalli Venkataramana ◽  
SV Padi Satyanarayana
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Essential Medicines ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Prescription Pattern ◽  
Prescribing Practice

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients are prone to infections and inevitably require antibiotics. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global threat to humans. Indeed, the most important cause for spread of AMR is irrational use of antibiotics. Therefore, the present study evaluates prescribing practice of antibiotics in CKD patients. A cross-sectional study was carried out in 382 CKD in-patients prescribed with antibiotics. The data were analysed using the WHO prescribing indicators and the WHO Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe) classification. The average number of drugs prescribed per encounter was 3.1. Antibiotics prescribed by generic name and prescribed from the Essential Medicines List were 52.9% and 47.1%, respectively. % Encounters with antibiotics and parenteral antibiotics were 59.2% and 77.4%, respectively. Third generation cephalosporins (76.9%), particularly cefoperazone (40%) and ceftriaxone (21.2%), were the most commonly prescribed antibiotics. A total of 19 specific antibiotics (Access 5, Watch 13, Reserve 1, and Not Recommended 0) were prescribed. According to WHO AWaRe classification, 10.6%, 89%, and 0.4% of antibiotics prescribed were from the ‘Access’, ‘Watch’, ‘Reserve’ categories, respectively. ‘Watch’ category antibiotics, particularly cephalosporins (98%), were prescribed in high rate. The most commonly prescribed ‘Access’ and ‘Watch’ category antibiotics were amikacin (37%) and cefoperazone (44.9%), respectively. Amoxicillin index was 1.6 and ‘Access-to-Watch’ index was 0.1, which were below the priority values. Prescription pattern of antibiotics observed in this study was not fully met the WHO recommendations. Additionally, ‘Watch’ category antibiotics, particularly cephalosporins, were prescribed frequently. Changes in prescription pattern and monitoring of antibiotic use are essential to preserve effectiveness and promote rational use of antibiotics, and to overcome AMR.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document