scholarly journals Laying straw men to rest: author’s reply to “Urgency and uncertainty: covid-19, face masks, and evidence informed policy”

BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. m2240
Author(s):  
Trisha Greenhalgh
Keyword(s):  
1983 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 625-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
AndreA Gunder Frank
Keyword(s):  

BioScience ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 250 ◽  
Author(s):  
BRIAN CZECH
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 577-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARY M. SHIRLEY

Abstract:Should scholars, like columnists, exaggerate and aggregate opposing views into men of straw? I analyse an example of scholarly criticism that characterizes the treatment of development in institutional economics as a simplistic and extremist paradigm. I argue that scholarly standards demand a complete and honest portrayal of contrary opinions and that straw men should be banished from scholarly discourse.


2003 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 411-412
Author(s):  
Charles R. Fox

This new heuristic model of perceptual analysis raises interesting issues but in the end falls short. Its arguments are more in the Cartesian than Gestalt tradition. Much of the argument is based on setting up theoretical straw men and ignores well known perceptual and brain science. Arguments are reviewed in light of known physiology and traditional Gestalt theory.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document