Paediatrician jailed for downloading child porn is struck off

BMJ ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. j3510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clare Dyer
Keyword(s):  
Child Porn

scholarly journals From child porn to China, in one Cleanfeed

SCRIPT-ed ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 174-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilian Edwards
Keyword(s):  
Child Porn

Digital Child Pornography

2010 ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Y.W. Law ◽  
K.P. Chow ◽  
Pierre K.Y. Lai ◽  
Hayson K.S. Tse ◽  
Kenneth W.H. Tse
Keyword(s):  
Web Sites ◽  
Child Pornography ◽  
Burden Of Proof ◽  
Cyber Crime ◽  
Important Distinction ◽  
The Subject ◽  
User Knowledge ◽  
Child Porn ◽  
Practical Investigation

Child pornography has become a major cyber crime in recent years. One of the challenging problems in child pornography cases is to distinguish if the subject files were downloaded intentionally or by accident without the knowledge of the computer user. The suspect may admit that he is an erotomania, but argue that the child porn materials were downloaded accidentally while surfing the pornographic web sites. In many jurisdictions, possession of child pornography without user knowledge is not a crime, while the burden of proof is on the prosecution. It is therefore important to identify if the child pornography exists by accident or not. In this chapter, the authors first review the technologies which sustain the prevalence of online child pornography and the recent research on child pornography investigation. Then, the authors present a set of practical investigation techniques. Subsequently, they apply the techniques in a case study with an attempt to distinguish if a suspect is a child pornography offender or just a normal erotomania. This is an important distinction to be made, since a person guilty of child pornography offenses is likely to be punished more seriously under most legal jurisdictions.

Net surfer convicted for cache of child porn disks

1995 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 612
Author(s):  
Helen Collinson
Keyword(s):  
Child Porn

Digital Child Pornography

Cyber Crime ◽  
2013 ◽  
pp. 851-869
Author(s):  
Frank Y.W. Law ◽  
K.P. Chow ◽  
Pierre K.Y. Lai ◽  
Hayson K.S. Tse ◽  
Kenneth W.H. Tse
Keyword(s):  
Web Sites ◽  
Child Pornography ◽  
Burden Of Proof ◽  
Cyber Crime ◽  
Important Distinction ◽  
The Subject ◽  
User Knowledge ◽  
Child Porn ◽  
Practical Investigation

Child pornography has become a major cyber crime in recent years. One of the challenging problems in child pornography cases is to distinguish if the subject files were downloaded intentionally or by accident without the knowledge of the computer user. The suspect may admit that he is an erotomania, but argue that the child porn materials were downloaded accidentally while surfing the pornographic web sites. In many jurisdictions, possession of child pornography without user knowledge is not a crime, while the burden of proof is on the prosecution. It is therefore important to identify if the child pornography exists by accident or not. In this chapter, the authors first review the technologies which sustain the prevalence of online child pornography and the recent research on child pornography investigation. Then, the authors present a set of practical investigation techniques. Subsequently, they apply the techniques in a case study with an attempt to distinguish if a suspect is a child pornography offender or just a normal erotomania. This is an important distinction to be made, since a person guilty of child pornography offenses is likely to be punished more seriously under most legal jurisdictions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document