Cuts are putting quality of care at risk, say NHS managers

BMJ ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 346 (feb13 4) ◽  
pp. f982-f982 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Cole
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Dora‐Laskey ◽  
Joan Kellenberg ◽  
Chin Hwa Dahlem ◽  
Elizabeth English ◽  
Monica Gonzalez Walker ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 161 (12) ◽  
pp. 1549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney H. Lyder ◽  
Jeanette Preston ◽  
Jacqueline N. Grady ◽  
Jeanne Scinto ◽  
Richard Allman ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan-Jane Johnstone

IN NOVEMBER 2002, in what stands as one of the most significant whistle blowing cases in the history of the Australian health care system, four nurses went public with concerns they had about the management of clinical incidents and patient safety at two hospitals in Sydney, New South Wales. The handling of this case and its aftermath raises important moral questions concerning the nature of whistleblowing in health care domains and the possible implications for the patient safety and quality of care movement in Australia. This paper presents an overview of the case, the moral risks associated with whistleblowing, and some lessons learned. The International Council of Nurses (2000) Code of Ethics stipulates that nurses have a stringent responsibility to 'take appropriate action to safeguard individuals when their care is endangered by a co-worker or any other person'. Other local and international nursing codes of ethics and standards of professional conduct likewise obligate nurses to take appropriate action to safeguard individuals when placed at risk by the incompetent, unethical or illegal acts of others ? including the system. Despite these coded moral prescriptions for responsible and accountable professional conduct, taking appropriate action when others are placed at risk (including making reports to appropriate authorities) is never an easy task nor is it free of risk for nurses. As has been amply demonstrated in the literature, taking a moral stance to protect patient safety and quality of care can be extremely hazardous to nurses (Johnstone 1994, 2002, 2004; Ahern & McDonald 2002). In situations where nurses report their concerns to an appropriate authority but nothing is done to either investigate or validate their claims, nurses are faced with the ethical dilemma and 'choice' of whether to: do nothing ('put up and shut up'); leave their current place of employment (and possibly even the profession); or take the matter further ('blow the whistle') by reporting their concerns to an external authority that they perceive as having the power to do something about their concerns. It is rare for nurses to 'blow the whistle' in the public domain. When they do, it is usually because they perceive that something is terribly wrong and, as a matter of conscience, they cannot just look on as morally passive bystanders. For those nurses who do take a stand, the costs to them personally and professionally are almost always devastating, with no guarantees that the situation on which they have taken a public stance will be improved. Nurses who blow the whistle often end up with their careers and lives in tatters (see case studies in Johnstone 1994 & 2004).


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Euijoon Ahn ◽  
Tanya Baldacchino ◽  
Rod Hughes ◽  
Christine Baird ◽  
Jinman Kim

BACKGROUND Re-presentations to emergency departments (EDs) have been directly associated with increased healthcare cost and length of stay, poorer quality of care and increased morbidity and mortality. Early detection of at-risk patients to EDs can reduce unnecessary re-presentations and provide provision of better quality of care and healthcare planning. Conventional risk predictive models, however, have difficulties when the at-risk patients have diverse and complex disease states or demographic profiles. These models also ignore related temporal patient information such as changes in their disease state and personal circumstance which can be used to model the progression of risks. OBJECTIVE Our aim is to develop a temporal risk predictive model based on recurrent neural network (RNN) can understand temporal relationships between different times of patient presentations to EDs and improve the predictive modelling. METHODS We used the data extracted from Health Information Exchange (HIE) system, which included all available ED records from the Nepean hospital in Australia from the period 1 January 2009 to 30 June 2016. A total of 343,014 ED presentations were identified from 170,134 individual patients. We used the variables including age, marital status, indigenous status, mode of arrival, mode of separations, referred to on departure and diagnosis code which have shown to be correlated to frequent presenters to EDs. We evaluated our RNN model by comparing it to other conventional predictive models using the area under to receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC). All models were trained using the ED data extracted from the 6 to 12-months period by setting an interval that is divided into an observation window and a prediction window. We further proposed a context-based patient representation learning (CPRL) framework to better characterise the feature representation of patient data and discussed the general extension of our CPRL framework as an optimisation algorithm to improve the feature representation of patient data. RESULTS Using a 9-month observation with 1-month prediction window (i.e., prediction of at-risk patients of re-presentation to ED in next 1-month), the AUROC for the RNN model was 71.60% compared to AUROCs for logistic regression (57.18%), Naves Bayes (56.35%) and random forest (56.02%). The at-risk patients presented to the ED more frequently (i.e., time (day) differences between presentations become shorter) when their marital status was changed (e.g., from ‘Married’ to ‘Separated’ or ‘Separated’ to ‘Divorced’). These patients also consistently had similar diagnoses during the observation period, indicating that these groups of patients may be the focus of certain integrated cares / interventions to improve the quality of care and reduce the unnecessary re-presentations. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that our RNN improves the predictive modelling, is robust and can effectively understand the disease state and personal circumstance changes within patients over time. We suggest that our model highlights the gaps in ED interventions and can be used to develop tailored integrated cares / interventions.


2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e98-e102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manali I. Patel ◽  
Donna C. Williams ◽  
Carla Wohlforth ◽  
George Fisher ◽  
Heather A. Wakelee ◽  
...  

Analysis of call content and prior events leading to after-hours calls may predict hospital admissions in patients with lung cancer and can inform development of proactive interventions to improve quality of care and patient-centered outcomes.


ASHA Leader ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 2-2
Author(s):  
Dennis Hampton
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document