scholarly journals Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 345 (oct02 3) ◽  
pp. e5909-e5909 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. R. Wehner ◽  
M. L. Shive ◽  
M.-M. Chren ◽  
J. Han ◽  
A. A. Qureshi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Skin Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Indoor Tanning ◽  
Non Melanoma Skin Cancer ◽  
Melanoma Skin

scholarly journals Indoor Tanning and the Risk of Overall and Early-Onset Melanoma and Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (23) ◽  
pp. 5940
Author(s):  
Seokyung An ◽  
Kyungsik Kim ◽  
Sungji Moon ◽  
Kwang-Pil Ko ◽  
Inah Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Skin Cancer ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Early Onset ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Indoor Tanning ◽  
Non Melanoma Skin Cancer ◽  
Annual Frequency ◽  
Summary Relative Risk ◽  
Melanoma Skin

The aim of this study was to examine the association between indoor tanning use and the risk of overall and early-onset (age < 50) melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC). To evaluate the association between indoor tanning and skin cancer, a systematic review of the literature published until July 2021 was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE. Summary relative risk (RR) from 18 studies with 10,406 NMSC cases and 36 studies with 14,583 melanoma cases showed significant association between skin cancer and indoor tanning (melanoma, RR= 1.27, 95% CI 1.16–1.39; NMSC, RR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.18–1.65; squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), RR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.38–1.81; basal cell carcinoma (BCC), RR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.00–1.55). The risk was more pronounced in early-onset skin cancer (melanoma, RR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.14–2.69; NMSC, RR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.48–2.68; SCC, RR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.38–2.37; BCC, RR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.15–2.77). Moreover, first exposure at an early age (age ≤ 20 years) and higher exposure (annual frequency ≥ 10 times) to indoor tanning showed increasing risk for melanoma (RR = 1.47, 95% CI 1.16–1.85; RR = 1.52, 1.22–1.89) and NMSC (RR = 2.02, 95% CI 1.44–2.83; RR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.31–1.86). These findings provide evidence supporting primary prevention policies regulating modifiable behaviors to reduce the additional risk of skin cancer among younger adults.

scholarly journals Risk of non-melanoma skin cancer in patients with psoriasis: An updated evidence from systematic review with meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 1047-1055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiujuan Wang ◽  
Qiang Liu ◽  
Lingling Wu ◽  
Zhenhua Nie ◽  
Zubing Mei
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Skin Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Non Melanoma Skin Cancer ◽  
Melanoma Skin

Risk of non-melanoma skin cancer for rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving TNF antagonist: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 769-778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiang-lin Wang ◽  
Wen-jun Yin ◽  
Ling-yun Zhou ◽  
Ge Zhou ◽  
Kun Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Skin Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Non Melanoma Skin Cancer ◽  
Tnf Antagonist ◽  
Melanoma Skin

Use of sunscreen and risk of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabet saes da Silva ◽  
Roberto Tavares ◽  
Felipe da silva Paulitsch ◽  
Linjie Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Skin Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Non Melanoma Skin Cancer ◽  
Melanoma Skin

Laser Treatment for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eran Sharon ◽  
Igor Snast ◽  
Moshe Lapidoth ◽  
Ran Kaftory ◽  
Daniel Mimouni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Skin Cancer ◽  
Laser Treatment ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Non Melanoma Skin Cancer ◽  
Melanoma Skin
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document