London head and neck dissection course

BMJ ◽  
2012 ◽  
pp. e4222
Author(s):  
Nabeela Ahmed ◽  
Waseem Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Dissection ◽  
Dissection Course

Organ sparing neck dissection for the treatment of head and neck cancers in children

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 56-61
Author(s):  
N.S. Grachev ◽  
◽  
I.N. Vorozhtsov ◽  
N.V. Babaskina ◽  
E.Yu. Iaremenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Dissection ◽  
Head And Neck Cancers ◽  
Organ Sparing

Lymph node yield in treatment naïve cases of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: en bloc lymphadenectomy versus level-by-level dissection

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
K Devaraja ◽  
K Pujary ◽  
B Ramaswamy ◽  
D R Nayak ◽  
N Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Dissection ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Lymph Node Yield ◽  
Node Yield

Abstract Background Lymph node yield is an important prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Variability in neck dissection sampling techniques has not been studied as a determinant of lymph node yield. Methods This retrospective study used lymph node yield and average nodes per level to compare level-by-level and en bloc neck dissection sampling methods, in primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cases operated between March 2017 and February 2020. Results From 123 patients, 182 neck dissections were analysed, of which 133 were selective and the rest were comprehensive: 55 had level-by-level sampling and 127 had undergone en bloc dissection. The level-by-level method yielded more nodes in all neck dissections combined (20 vs 17; p = 0.097), but the difference was significant only for the subcohort of selective neck dissection (18.5 vs 15; p = 0.011). However, the gain in average nodes per level achieved by level-by-level sampling was significant in both groups (4.2 vs 3.33 and 4.4 vs 3, respectively; both p < 0.001). Conclusion Sampling of cervical lymph nodes level-by-level yields more nodes than the en bloc technique. Further studies could verify whether neck dissection sampling technique has any impact on survival rates.

scholarly journals Swedish National Multicenter Study on Head and Neck Cancer of Unknown Primary: Prognostic Factors and Impact of Treatment on Survival

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Axelsson ◽  
Erik Holmberg ◽  
Jan Nyman ◽  
Anders Högmo ◽  
Helena Sjödin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Dissection ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Cancer Of Unknown Primary ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
N Stage

Abstract Introduction Head and neck cancer of unknown primary (HNCUP) is a rare condition whose prognostic factors that are significant for survival vary between studies. No randomized treatment study has been performed thus far, and the optimal treatment is not established. Objective The present study aimed to explore various prognostic factors and compare the two main treatments for HNCUP: neck dissection and (chemo) radiation vs primary (chemo) radiation. Methods A national multicenter study was performed with data from the Swedish Head and Neck Cancer Register (SweHNCR) and from the patients' medical records from 2008 to 2012. Results Two-hundred and sixty HNCUP patients were included. The tumors were HPV-positive in 80%. The overall 5-year survival rate of patients treated with curative intent was 71%. Age (p < 0.001), performance status (p= 0.036), and N stage (p= 0.046) were significant factors for overall survival according to the multivariable analysis. Treatment with neck dissection and (chemo) radiation (122 patients) gave an overall 5-year survival of 73%, and treatment with primary (chemo) radiation (87 patients) gave an overall 5-year survival of 71%, with no significant difference in overall or disease-free survival between the 2 groups. Conclusions Age, performance status, and N stage were significant prognostic factors. Treatment with neck dissection and (chemo) radiation and primary (chemo) radiation gave similar survival outcomes. A randomized treatment study that includes quality of life is needed to establish the optimal treatment.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of nivolumab affected by prior cetuximab use and neck dissection in Japanese patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer: results from a retrospective observational study in a real-world setting

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shin Kariya ◽  
Yasushi Shimizu ◽  
Nobuhiro Hanai ◽  
Ryuji Yasumatsu ◽  
Tomoya Yokota ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Dissection ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background To examine the effect of prior use of cetuximab and neck dissection on the effectiveness of nivolumab, we conducted a large-scale subgroup analysis in Japanese patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer. Methods Data on the effectiveness of nivolumab were extracted from patient medical records. All patients were analyzed for effectiveness by prior cetuximab use. In the analyses for prior neck dissection, only patients with locally advanced disease were included. Results Of 256 patients analyzed, 155 had received prior cetuximab. Nineteen of 50 patients with local recurrence underwent neck dissection. The objective response rate was 14.7 vs 17.2% (p = 0.6116), median progression-free survival was 2.0 vs 3.1 months (p = 0.0261), and median overall survival was 8.4 vs 12 months (p = 0.0548) with vs without prior cetuximab use, respectively. The objective response rate was 23.1 vs 25.9% (p = 0.8455), median progression-free survival was 1.8 vs 3.0 months (p = 0.6650), and median overall survival was 9.1 vs 9.9 months (p = 0.5289) with vs without neck dissection, respectively. Conclusions These findings support the use of nivolumab for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer regardless of prior cetuximab use or neck dissection history. Trial registration number UMIN-CTR (UMIN000032600), Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03569436)

Complications after Functional Neck Dissection in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: An Observational, Retrospective, Single-Centre Study

ORL ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Carlos M. Chiesa-Estomba ◽  
Maria Soriano-Reixach ◽  
Izaskun Thomas-Arrizabalaga ◽  
Jon A. Sistiaga-Suarez ◽  
Jose A. González-García ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Dissection ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Surgical Complications ◽  
Statistical Correlation ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Common Complication ◽  
Neck Malignancy ◽  
Single Centre Study ◽  
Functional Neck Dissection

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Functional neck dissection (FND) represents a surgical procedure usually associated with less morbidity. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> An observational, retrospective, analysis of patients diagnosed with any type of head and neck malignancy was designed to summarize and report the incidence of postoperative complications in patients undergoing FND including just those levels described for selective neck dissections in a tertiary university hospital between June 2016 and June 2019. <b><i>Results:</i></b> 131 patients met the inclusion criteria. The total number of sides studied was 200. 40.5% of the patients suffer a complication in the postoperative period, being the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) injury the most common complication (10%). We did not find any statistical ­correlation between the previous organ-preservation treatments and surgical complications (<i>p</i> = 0.207). An advanced T stage (<i>p</i> = 0.009) and the need of bilateral FND (<i>p</i> = 0.034) were significantly correlated with a higher risk of surgical complications. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> FND represents a useful technique. In this study, 40.5% of the patients suffer a complication in the postoperative period, being the SAN injury the most common complication. However, these data contribute to increasing our knowledge about surgical complications related to FND.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document