scholarly journals Association of echocardiography before major elective non-cardiac surgery with postoperative survival and length of hospital stay: population based cohort study

BMJ ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 342 (jun30 1) ◽  
pp. d3695-d3695 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. N. Wijeysundera ◽  
W. S. Beattie ◽  
K. Karkouti ◽  
M. D. Neuman ◽  
P. C. Austin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Postoperative Survival

Length of hospital stay, obstetric conditions at childbirth, and maternal readmission: A population-based cohort study

2002 ◽  
Vol 187 (3) ◽  
pp. 681-687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiliang Liu ◽  
Maureen Heaman ◽  
Michael S. Kramer ◽  
Kitaw Demissie ◽  
Shi Wu Wen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Population Based

scholarly journals Long-Term Outcome of Cardiac Surgery in 1,040 Liver Cirrhosis Patient　― Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study ―

2017 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 476-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
An-Hsun Chou ◽  
Tien-Hsing Chen ◽  
Chun-Yu Chen ◽  
Shao-Wei Chen ◽  
Chao-Wei Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Cirrhosis Patient ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Liver Cirrhosis Patient

scholarly journals Influence of Weekday of Admission and Level of Distress on Length of Hospital Stay in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuel Brunner ◽  
André Meichtry ◽  
Davy Vancampfort ◽  
Reinhard Imoberdorf ◽  
David Gisi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Linear Model ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Complex Problem ◽  
Interdisciplinary Management ◽  
Prolonged Length ◽  
The Impact

Abstract BackgroundLow back pain (LBP) is often a complex problem requiring interdisciplinary management to address patients’ multidimensional needs. The inpatient care for patients with LBP in primary care hospitals is a challenge. In this setting, interdisciplinary LBP management is often unavailable during the weekend. Delays in therapeutic procedures may result in prolonged length of hospital stay (LoS). The impact of delays on LoS might be strongest in patients reporting high levels of psychological distress. Therefore, this study investigates which influence the weekday of admission and distress have on LoS of inpatients with LBP.MethodsRetrospective cohort study conducted between 1 February 2019 and 31 January 2020. ANOVA was used to test the hypothesized difference in mean effects of the weekday of admission on LoS. Further, a linear model was fitted for LoS with distress, categorical weekday of admission (Friday/Saturday vs. Sunday-Thursday), and their interactions.ResultsWe identified 173 patients with LBP. Mean LoS was 7.8 days (SD=5.59). Patients admitted on Friday (mean LoS=10.3) and Saturday (LoS=10.6) had longer stays but not those admitted on Sunday (LoS=7.1). Analysis of the weekday effect (Friday/Saturday vs. Sunday-Thursday) showed that admission on Friday or Saturday was associated with significant increase in LoS compared to admission on other weekdays (t=3.43, p=<0.001). 101 patients (58%) returned questionnaires, and complete data on distress was available from 86 patients (49%). According to a linear model for LoS, the effect of distress on LoS was significantly modified (t=2.51, p=0.014) by dichotomic weekdays of admission (Friday/Saturday vs. Sunday-Thursday).ConclusionsPatients with LBP are hospitalized significantly longer if they have to wait more than two days for interdisciplinary LBP management. This particularly affects patients reporting high distress. Our study provides a platform to further explore whether interdisciplinary LBP management addressing patients’ multidimensional needs reduces LoS in primary care hospitals.

Preventable hospitalizations among older patients with cognitive impairments and dementia

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 383-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominik Wolf ◽  
Carolin Rhein ◽  
Katharina Geschke ◽  
Andreas Fellgiebel
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Ambulatory Care ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Cognitive Impairments ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Complication Rates

ABSTRACTObjectives:Dementia and cognitive impairment are associated with higher rates of complications and mortality during hospitalization in older patients. Moreover, length of hospital stay and costs are increased. In this prospective cohort study, we investigated the frequency of hospitalizations caused by ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSCs), for which proactive ambulatory care might prevent the need for a hospital stay, in older patients with and without cognitive impairments.Design:Prospective cohort study.Setting:Eight hospitals in Germany.Participants:A total of 1,320 patients aged 70 years and older.Measurements:The Mini-Cog test has been used to assess cognition and to categorize patients in the groups no/moderate cognitive impairments (probably no dementia) and severe cognitive impairments (probable dementia). Moreover, lengths of hospital stay and complication rates have been assessed, using a binary questionnaire (if occurred during hospital stay or not; behavioral symptoms were adapted from the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory). Data have been acquired by the nursing staff who received a special multi-day training.Results:Patients with severe cognitive impairments showed higher complication rates (including incontinence, disorientation, irritability/aggression, restlessness/anxiety, necessity of Tranquilizers and psychiatric consults, application of measures limiting freedom, and falls) and longer hospital stays (+1.4 days) than patients with no/moderate cognitive impairments. Both groups showed comparably high ACSC-caused admission rates of around 23%.Conclusions:The study indicates that about one-fourth of hospital admissions of cognitively normal and impaired older adults are caused by ACSCs, which are mostly treatable on an ambulatory basis. This implies that an improved ambulatory care might reduce the frequency of hospitalizations, which is of particular importance in cognitively impaired elderly due to increased complication rates.

scholarly journals Association between neuraxial anaesthesia or general anaesthesia for lower limb revascularisation surgery in adults and clinical outcomes: population based comparative effectiveness study

BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. m4104
Author(s):  
Derek J Roberts ◽  
Sudhir K Nagpal ◽  
Dalibor Kubelik ◽  
Timothy Brandys ◽  
Henry T Stelfox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Instrumental Variable ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Neuraxial Anaesthesia ◽  
Renal Complications ◽  
Comparative Effectiveness Study

Abstract Objective To examine the associations between neuraxial anaesthesia or general anaesthesia and clinical outcomes, length of hospital stay, and readmission in adults undergoing lower limb revascularisation surgery. Design Comparative effectiveness study using linked, validated, population based databases. Setting Ontario, Canada, 1 April 2002 to 31 March 2015. Participants 20 988 patients Ontario residents aged 18 years or older who underwent their first lower limb revascularisation surgery in hospitals performing 50 or more of these surgeries annually. Main outcome measures Primary outcome was 30 day all cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital cardiopulmonary and renal complications, length of hospital stay, and 30 day readmissions. Multivariable, mixed effects regression models, adjusting for patient, procedural, and hospital characteristics, were used to estimate associations between anaesthetic technique and outcomes. Robustness of analyses were evaluated by conducting instrumental variable, propensity score matched, and survival sensitivity analyses. Results Of 20 988 patients who underwent lower limb revascularisation surgery, 6453 (30.7%) received neuraxial anaesthesia and 14 535 (69.3%) received general anaesthesia. The percentage of neuraxial anaesthesia use ranged from 0.6% to 90.6% across included hospitals. Furthermore, use of neuraxial anaesthesia declined by 17% over the study period. Death within 30 days occurred in 204 (3.2%) patients who received neuraxial anaesthesia and 646 (4.4%) patients who received general anaesthesia. After multivariable, multilevel adjustment, use of neuraxial anaesthesia compared with use of general anaesthesia was associated with decreased 30 day mortality (absolute risk reduction 0.72%, 95% confidence interval 0.65% to 0.79%; odds ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.57 to 0.83; number needed to treat to prevent one death=139). A similar direction and magnitude of association was found in instrumental variable, propensity score matched, and survival analyses. Use of neuraxial anaesthesia compared with use of general anaesthesia was also associated with decreased in-hospital cardiopulmonary and renal complications (odds ratio 0.73, 0.63 to 0.85) and a reduced length of hospital stay (−0.5 days, −0.3 to−0.6 days). Conclusions Use of neuraxial anaesthesia compared with general anaesthesia for lower limb revascularisation surgery was associated with decreased 30 day mortality and hospital length of stay. These findings might have been related to reduced cardiopulmonary and renal complications after neuraxial anaesthesia and support the increased use of neuraxial anaesthesia in patients undergoing these surgeries until the results of a large, confirmatory randomised trial become available.

scholarly journals Chronic post‐operative opioid use after open cardiac surgery: A Danish population‐based cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-57
Author(s):  
Kasper Bonnesen ◽  
Lone Nikolajsen ◽  
Henrik Bøggild ◽  
Per Hostrup Nielsen ◽  
Carl‐Johan Jacobsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Danish Population
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document