scholarly journals Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: qualitative analysis of interim results from a prospective national evaluation

BMJ ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 341 (sep01 3) ◽  
pp. c4564-c4564 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Robertson ◽  
K. Cresswell ◽  
A. Takian ◽  
D. Petrakaki ◽  
S. Crowe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Secondary Care ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Electronic Health

scholarly journals Maximizing the use of social and behavioural information from secondary care mental health electronic health records

2020 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. 103429
Author(s):  
S.M. Goodday ◽  
A. Kormilitzin ◽  
N. Vaci ◽  
Q. Liu ◽  
A. Cipriani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Secondary Care ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Electronic Health

scholarly journals Primary Care Medication Safety Surveillance with Integrated Primary and Secondary Care Electronic Health Records: A Cross-Sectional Study

Drug Safety ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 671-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Artur Akbarov ◽  
Evangelos Kontopantelis ◽  
Matthew Sperrin ◽  
Susan J. Stocks ◽  
Richard Williams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Secondary Care ◽  
Medication Safety ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Safety Surveillance ◽  
Electronic Health

scholarly journals “It’s like texting at the dinner table”: A qualitative analysis of the impact of electronic health records on patient-physician interaction in hospitals

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly D Pelland ◽  
Rosa R Baier ◽  
Rebekah L Gardner
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
Rank Order ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Patient Interactions ◽  
Inpatient Settings ◽  
Prior Literature ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
The Impact

Background: Electronic health records (EHRs) may reduce medical errors and improve care, but can complicate clinical encounters.Objective: To describe hospital-based physicians’ perceptions of the impact of EHRs on patient-physician interactions and contrast these findings against office-based physicians’ perceptionsMethods: We performed a qualitative analysis of comments submitted in response to the 2014 Rhode Island Health Information Technology Survey. Office- and hospital-based physicians licensed in Rhode Island, in active practice, and located in Rhode Island or neighboring states completed the survey about their Electronic Health Record use.Results: The survey’s response rate was 68.3% and 2,236 (87.1%) respondents had EHRs. Among survey respondents, 27.3% of hospital-based and 37.8% of office-based physicians with EHRs responded to the question about patient interaction. Five main themes emerged for hospital-based physicians, with respondents generally perceiving EHRs as negatively altering patient interactions. We noted the same five themes among office-based physicians, but the rank-order of the top two responses differed by setting: hospital-based physicians commented most frequently that they spend less time with patients because they have to spend more time on computers; office-based physicians commented most frequently on EHRs worsening the quality of their interactions and relationships with patients.Conclusion: In our analysis of a large sample of physicians, hospital-based physicians generally perceived EHRs as negatively altering patient interactions, although they emphasized different reasons than their office-based counterparts. These findings add to the prior literature, which focuses on outpatient physicians, and can shape interventions to improve how EHRs are used in inpatient settings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document