Immunogenicity and safety of the 2009 non-adjuvanted influenza A/H1N1 vaccine in a large cohort of autoimmune rheumatic diseases

2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 1068-1073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla G S Saad ◽  
Eduardo F Borba ◽  
Nadia E Aikawa ◽  
Clovis A Silva ◽  
Rosa M R Pereira ◽  
...  

BackgroundDespite the WHO recommendation that the 2010–2011 trivalent seasonal flu vaccine must contain A/California/7/2009/H1N1-like virus there is no consistent data regarding its immunogenicity and safety in a large autoimmune rheumatic disease (ARD) population.Methods1668 ARD patients (systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), systemic sclerosis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA), Behçet's disease (BD), mixed connective tissue disease, primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS), dermatomyositis (DM), primary Sjögren's syndrome, Takayasu's arteritis, polymyositis and Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's) (GPA)) and 234 healthy controls were vaccinated with a non-adjuvanted influenza A/California/7/2009(H1N1) virus-like strain flu. Subjects were evaluated before vaccination and 21 days post-vaccination. The percentage of seroprotection, seroconversion and the factor increase in geometric mean titre (GMT) were calculated.ResultsAfter immunisation, seroprotection rates (68.5% vs 82.9% p<0.0001), seroconversion rates (63.4% vs 76.9%, p<0.001) and the factor increase in GMT (8.9 vs 13.2 p<0.0001) were significantly lower in ARD than controls. Analysis of specific diseases revealed that seroprotection significantly reduced in SLE (p<0.0001), RA (p<0.0001), PsA (p=0.0006), AS (p=0.04), BD (p=0.04) and DM (p=0.04) patients than controls. The seroconversion rates in SLE (p<0.0001), RA (p<0.0001) and PsA (p=0.0006) patients and the increase in GMTs in SLE (p<0.0001), RA (p<0.0001) and PsA (p<0.0001) patients were also reduced compared with controls. Moderate and severe side effects were not reported.ConclusionsThe novel recognition of a diverse vaccine immunogenicity profile in distinct ARDs supports the notion that a booster dose may be recommended for diseases with suboptimal immune responses. This large study also settles the issue of vaccine safety.(ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01151644)

2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
NADIA E. AIKAWA ◽  
LUCIA M.A. CAMPOS ◽  
CLOVIS A. SILVA ◽  
JOZELIO F. CARVALHO ◽  
CARLA G.S. SAAD ◽  
...  

Objective.To assess the immunogenicity and safety of non-adjuvanted influenza A H1N1/2009 vaccine in patients with juvenile autoimmune rheumatic disease (ARD) and healthy controls, because data are limited to the adult rheumatologic population.Methods.A total of 237 patients with juvenile ARD [juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), juvenile scleroderma, and vasculitis] and 91 healthy controls were vaccinated. Serology for anti-H1N1 was performed by hemagglutination inhibition assay. Seroprotection rate, seroconversion rate, and factor-increase in geometric mean titer (GMT) were calculated. Adverse events were evaluated.Results.Age was comparable in patients and controls (14.8 ± 3.0 vs 14.6 ± 3.7 years, respectively; p = 0.47). Three weeks after immunization, seroprotection rate (81.4% vs 95.6%; p = 0.0007), seroconversion rate (74.3 vs 95.6%; p < 0.0001), and the factor-increase in GMT (12.9 vs 20.3; p = 0.012) were significantly lower in patients with juvenile ARD versus controls. Subgroup analysis revealed reduced seroconversion rates in JSLE (p < 0.0001), JIA (p = 0.008), JDM (p = 0.025), and vasculitis (p = 0.017). Seroprotection (p < 0.0001) and GMT (p < 0.0001) were decreased only in JSLE. Glucocorticoid use and lymphopenia were associated with lower seroconversion rates (60.4 vs 82.9%; p = 0.0001; and 55.6 vs 77.2%; p = 0.012). Multivariate logistic regression including diseases, lymphopenia, glucocorticoid, and immunosuppressants demonstrated that only glucocorticoid use (p = 0.012) remained significant.Conclusion.This is the largest study to demonstrate a reduced but adequate immune response to H1N1 vaccine in patients with juvenile ARD. It identified current glucocorticoid use as the major factor for decreased antibody production. The short-term safety results support its routine recommendation for patients with juvenile ARD. ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01151644.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 677-677
Author(s):  
Hugues de Lavallade ◽  
Paula Lorraine Garland ◽  
Takuya Sekine ◽  
Katja Hoschler ◽  
David Marin ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 677 In 2009 the spread of influenza A (H1N1) satisfied the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for a global pandemic and led to the initiation of a vaccination campaign to ensure protection for the most vulnerable patients. However, the immunogenicity of the 2009 H1N1 vaccine in immunocompromised patients has not been specifically evaluated. Furthermore, the number of doses of vaccine required for effective immunization against H1N1 has not been established. Whereas the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) and the UK Department of Health (DoH) recommended the injection of two doses of inactivated H1N1 vaccine 3 weeks apart in immunocompromised individuals, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended immunization with one dose of inactivated H1N1 vaccine for patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy, followed by a booster vaccine after completion of treatment if the pandemic continued. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of the 2009 H1N1 vaccine in patients with hematologic malignancies. We prospectively evaluated the humoral and cellular immune responses to monovalent influenza A/California/2009(H1N1)v-like strain surface antigen vaccine in 97 adults with hematologic malignancies and 25 adult controls. Patients received two intramuscular injections of the vaccine 21 days apart and controls received one dose. Antibody titers, expressed as geometric mean, were measured using a hemagglutination-inhibition assay on days 0, 21 and 49 after injection of the first dose. The induction of virus-specific T-cell responses by H1N1 vaccination was assessed directly ex-vivo by flow cytometric enumeration of antigen-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T-lymphocytes using an intracellular cytokine assay for IFN-γ and TNF-α production on days 0 and 49. Of the 97 patients, 32 had chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase in complete cytogenetic response on the tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib or dasatinib, 39 had a B-cell malignancy in complete remission (CR) or untreated, and 26 were recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in CR at least 6 months beyond transplant and without evidence of graft versus host disease. The vaccine was well tolerated, with no obvious difference in side effects for patients and controls. By day 21 post-vaccination, protective antibody titers of 1:32 or more were seen in 100% of controls compared to 39% of patients with B-cell malignancies (p<0.001), 46% of allo-SCT recipients (p<0.001) and 85% of CML patients (p=0.086). The effect of a booster dose was assessed with a paired sample analysis. After a second vaccine dose, the seroprotection rates increased to 68% (p=0.008), 73% (p=0.031), and 95% (p=0.5) in patients with B-cell malignancies, allo-SCT recipients and CML patients respectively. Patients vaccinated within 6 months of rituximab-based chemotherapy failed to mount a seroprotective antibody response. We also assessed the cellular response to H1N1 vaccine. Prior to vaccination, pre-existing T-cells against H1N1 could be detected in 10/23 controls compared to 2/25 allo-SCT recipients (p=0.007), 2/28 patients with B-cell malignancies (p=0.003) and 6/28 of CML patients (p=0.131). These pre-existing H1N1 T-cell responses may be related to previous exposure to 2009 H1N1 virus but more likely are due to the presence of cross-reactive seasonal and pandemic H1N1 specific T-cells. Following vaccination, H1N1-specific T-cells were induced in a significant proportion of allo-SCT recipient (10/25, p=0.008) and patients with B-cell malignancies (10/28; p=0.008), but not in CML patients or healthy controls. The limited ability of vaccines to significantly increase pre-existing influenza-specific T-cells has been previously reported although the mechanism for this phenomenon is not fully elucidated. These data demonstrate efficacy of H1N1 vaccine in the majority of patients with hematologic malignancies and unequivocally support the EMEA and the UK DoH official guidelines for the administration of 2 vaccine doses in immunocompromised patients to induce protective immune response against 2009 H1N1 influenza. Based on the WHO analyses, it is expected that the pandemic 2009 H1N1 virus will remain globally predominant in 2010–2011. These results may contribute towards the development of evidence-based guidelines for influenza vaccination in patients with hematologic malignancies. Disclosures: Marin: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.


2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 1478-1480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biao Di ◽  
Xinhong Xu ◽  
Tiegang Li ◽  
Enjie Lu ◽  
Jibin Wu ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT We present immunogenicity data on the routine vaccination of 103 health care personnel during the 2009 H1N1 national vaccination campaign. The seroprotection rate (percentage of samples with hemagglutination inhibition titers of ≥1:40) was 83.2% at 30 days postvaccination, lower than those obtained in previously published controlled trials. Low baseline antibody levels and an increase in seroprotection in a negative-control cohort suggest that the virus remains prevalent.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto K. De la Herrán-Arita ◽  
Fabio García-García

Narcolepsy is a neurological disorder characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness, cataplexy, hypnagonic hallucinations, sleep paralysis, and disturbed nocturnal sleep patterns. This disease is secondary to the specific loss of hypothalamic hypocretin (orexin)-producing neurons in the lateral hypothalamus. An autoimmune basis for the disease has long been suspected based on its strong association with the genetic marker DQB1*06:02, and current studies greatly support this hypothesis. Narcolepsy with hypocretin deficiency is associated with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and T cell receptor (TCR) polymorphisms, suggesting that an autoimmune process targets a peptide unique to hypocretin-producing neurons via specific HLA-peptide-TCR interactions. This concept has gained a lot of notoriety after the increase of childhood narcolepsy in 2010 following the 2009 H1N1 pandemic (pH1N1) in China and vaccination with Pandemrix, an adjuvanted H1N1 vaccine that was used in Scandinavia. The surge of narcolepsy cases subsequent to influenza A H1N1 infection and H1N1 vaccination suggests that processes such as molecular mimicry or bystander activation might be crucial for disease development.


Author(s):  
Eduardo Pernambuco de Souza ◽  
Marcelo de Souza Teixeira

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to determine, among medical students at a public university in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, the acceptance of the pandemic influenza A/H1N1 vaccine during the 2010 mass immunization campaign and the vaccine safety in this group and, among unvaccinated students, the reasons for refusing vaccination. Of a total of 858 students, 678 (79%) participated in the study. Vaccination coverage was 60.4% among students aged 20 to 39 years (an age group targeted for vaccination) and 43.8% among those who did not belong to this age group. The most frequent adverse reactions to the vaccine were pain at the injection site (8.7%) and fever (7.9%). There were no serious adverse reactions. Among students aged 20 to 39 years, the most common reasons for refusing the vaccine were "lack of time" (42.4%), "fear of adverse reactions" (41.9%), and "difficult access to the vaccine" (11.5%). Other reasons for vaccine refusal were "uncertainties about vaccine safety and efficacy" and "vaccination was not needed". To increase the acceptance of the influenza vaccine, a comprehensive immunization program should be offered to these students.


2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 1358-1364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee Jin Cheong ◽  
Joon Young Song ◽  
Jung Yeon Heo ◽  
Ji Yun Noh ◽  
Won Suk Choi ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTSince initial reports in April 2009, the pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus has spread globally. Influenza vaccines are the primary method for the control of influenza and its complications. We conducted a multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of H1N1 vaccine (Green Cross Co.) in young adults (18 to 64 years) and the elderly (≥65 years) using a two-dose regimen, with the doses administered 21 days apart. Three different regimens of hemagglutinin antigen were comparatively analyzed: 3.75 μg (MF59 adjuvanted) versus 7.5 μg (MF59 adjuvanted) versus 15 μg (nonadjuvanted) in young adults and 3.75 μg (MF59 adjuvanted) versus 7.5 μg (MF59 adjuvanted) in the elderly. In young adults, all three vaccine regimens met the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMA) criteria after the first dose. In the elderly, on day 21 after the first dose, the rates of seroprotection and seroconversion were significantly higher for the 7.5-μg dose of MF59 adjuvanted vaccine than for the 3.75-μg dose (58.0% versus 44.3% [P= 0.03] and 53.7% versus 37.2% [P< 0.01], respectively). After the second dose, the geometric mean titer (GMT) increment was blunted with a 15-μg dose of nonadjuvanted vaccine, whereas the GMT increased about 2-fold with MF59 adjuvanted vaccines. In conclusion, a single 7.5-μg dose of MF59 adjuvanted vaccine would have a practical advantage over a two-dose, 3.75-μg, MF59 adjuvanted vaccine priming schedule. Following a two-dose priming schedule, the increase in hemagglutinin inhibition titers was higher with MF59 adjuvanted vaccine than with nonadjuvanted vaccine.


2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (36) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Harris ◽  
K Wong ◽  
L Stanford ◽  
J Fediurek ◽  
N Crowcroft ◽  
...  

A vaccine safety signal and association between new onset of narcolepsy and AS03-adjuvanted pandemic influenza A(H1N1) vaccine (Pandemrix, GlaxoSmithKline) in children and young adults has been reported in several European countries. In Ontario, Canada, AS03-adjuvanted pandemic A(H1N1) vaccine (Arepanrix, GlaxoSmithKline) was the primary vaccine administered in 2009/10, with 4.8 million doses distributed. We assessed post-marketing safety surveillance data by extracting adverse events following immunisation (AEFIs) associated with this vaccine from the integrated Public Health Information System. Reports were screened for key terms related to narcolepsy and further limited to children and young adults four to 29 years of age. Of 1,604 AEFIs reported in Ontario, 53 reports met the search criteria. Individual assessment by a nurse consultant for additional context suggestive of narcolepsy yielded five reports for secondary medical review. None of the five reports proved consistent with a possible narcolepsy diagnosis based on the available information. We present the first post-marketing assessment from Canada of narcolepsy reports following receipt of Arepanix. Continued investigation of differences between Arepanrix and Pandemrix and subsequent risk of narcolepsy is indicated. In light of the limitations of passive surveillance to detect a signal in this instance, validation using other data sources is prudent.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell D. Ravert ◽  
Linda Y. Fu ◽  
Gregory D. Zimet

This study examined health beliefs associated with novel influenza A (H1N1) immunization among US college undergraduates during the 2009-2010 pandemic. Undergraduates (ages 18–24 years) from a large Midwestern University were invited to complete an online survey during March, 2010, five months after H1N1 vaccines became available. Survey items measured H1N1 vaccine history and H1N1-related attitudes based on the health belief literature. Logistic regression was used to identify attitudes associated with having received an H1N1 vaccine, and thematic analysis of student comments was conducted to further understand influences on vaccine decisions. Among the 296 students who participated in the survey, 15.2% reported having received an H1N1 vaccine. In regression analysis, H1N1 immunization was associated with seasonal flu vaccine history, perceived vaccine effectiveness, perceived obstacles to vaccination, and vaccine safety concerns. Qualitative results illustrate the relationship of beliefs to vaccine decisions, particularly in demonstrating that students often held concerns that vaccine could cause H1N1 or side effects. Vaccine safety, efficacy, and obstacles to immunization were major considerations in deciding whether to accept the H1N1 pandemic vaccine. Therefore, focusing on those aspects might be especially useful in future vaccine efforts within the college population.


2012 ◽  
Vol 141 (5) ◽  
pp. 1070-1079 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. B. HONG ◽  
E. Y. CHOI ◽  
S. H. KIM ◽  
G. Y. SUH ◽  
M. S. PARK ◽  
...  

SUMMARYA total of 245 patients with confirmed 2009 H1N1 influenza were admitted to the intensive-care units of 28 hospitals (South Korea). Their mean age was 55·3 years with 68·6% aged >50 years, and 54·7% male. Nine were obese and three were pregnant. One or more comorbidities were present in 83·7%, and nosocomial acquisition occurred in 14·3%. In total, 107 (43·7%) patients received corticosteroids and 66·1% required mechanical ventilation. Eighty (32·7%) patients died within 30 days after onset of symptoms and 99 (40·4%) within 90 days. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the clinician's decision to prescribe corticosteroids, older age, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and nosocomial bacterial pneumonia were independent risk factors for 90-day mortality. In contrast with Western countries, critical illness in Korea in relation to 2009 H1N1 was most common in older patients with chronic comorbidities; nosocomial acquisition occurred occasionally but disease in obese or pregnant patients was uncommon.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document