Stereochemical studies. XXXVIII. Conformational energies for the axial-equatorial change in different cyclohexyl systems

1966 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 2889-2898 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Tichý ◽  
F. Šipoš ◽  
J. Sicher
Keyword(s):  
Conformational Energies

scholarly journals Conformational energies and equilibria of cyclic dinucleotides in vacuo and in solution: computational chemistry vs. NMR experiments

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ondrej Gutten ◽  
Petr Jurečka ◽  
Zahra Aliakbar Tehrani ◽  
Miloš Buděšínský ◽  
Jan Řezáč ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Dynamics ◽  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Computational Chemistry ◽  
Computational Error ◽  
Cyclic Dinucleotides ◽  
Error Bars ◽  
Conformational Energies

Computational “error bars” for modelling cyclic dinucleotides – NMR experiment vs. quantum mechanics and molecular dynamics.

A pairwise additivity scheme for conformational energies of substituted ethanes

1975 ◽  
Vol 343 (1632) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Large Deviations ◽  
Ab Initio ◽  
Dihedral Angle ◽  
Molecular Orbital ◽  
Methyl Groups ◽  
Molecular Orbital Calculations ◽  
Linear Combinations ◽  
Strongly Interacting ◽  
Conformational Energies

Ab initio molecular orbital calculations are used to explore additivity in the conformational energies of poly-substituted ethanes in terms of conformational energies of ethane and appropriate mono- and 1,2-di-substituted derivatives. Such relations would allow complex calculations for poly-substituted ethanes to be replaced by much simpler ones on a small number of parent molecules. General expressions for the linear combinations are derived from the assumption that interactions between vicinal substituents are pairwise additive and depend only on the vicinal dihedral angle. The additivity scheme is tested for 15 ethanes, di-, tri- or tetrasubstituted by cyano and methyl groups and for a smaller number of fluoroethanes. Additivity applies to within 0.1- 0.3 k J mol -1 in the methylethanes and mostly to within about 0.7- 0.8 kJ mol -1 in cyanoethanes. Large deviations are found among the geminally substituted fluoroethanes. It is suggested that the additivity approximation is most successful in the absence of strongly interacting geminal groups. Predictions are made of conformational energies of ten hexa(cyano- and methyl-) substituted ethanes.

Conformational features of bisphenol-A polycarbonate

1985 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. R. Sundararajan
Keyword(s):  
Bisphenol A ◽  
Repeat Unit ◽  
Methyl Groups ◽  
Bisphenol A Polycarbonate ◽  
Carbonate Group ◽  
Torsion Angles ◽  
Thermal Crystallization ◽  
Lennard Jones ◽  
Empirical Force Field ◽  
Conformational Energies

Conformational energies have been estimated for the segments of the bisphenol polycarbonate chain, using the Lennard–Jones and Hill's empirical force field type of functions. It is found that the conformation of the carbonate group, defined by the torsion angle ζ, is restricted to the range of 45° to 65°. The rotations χ and χ′ of the methyl groups also show similar limited flexibility. However, accessible conformations of the diphenyl propane (DPP) segment, defined by torsion angles [Formula: see text] and ψ, span a wide area of the [Formula: see text] surface, with the restriction that the rotations [Formula: see text] and ψ be synchronized such that [Formula: see text] or 270°. These features explain the slow thermal crystallization behaviour of the polycarbonate chains. The variability of the conformations of the repeat unit is illustrated with a series of figures.

A Comparison of the ab Initio Calculated and Experimental Conformational Energies of Alkylcyclohexanes

2000 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc L. Kasner ◽  
Fillmore Freeman ◽  
Zufan M. Tsegai ◽  
Warren J. Hehre
Keyword(s):  
Ab Initio ◽  
Conformational Energies

Conformational energies and random‐coil configuration of poly(3,3‐dimethyl oxetane) (PDO)

1980 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 958-964 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Saiz ◽  
E. Riande ◽  
J. Guzmán ◽  
J. de Abajo
Keyword(s):  
Random Coil ◽  
Conformational Energies

scholarly journals r2SCAN-3c: An Efficient “Swiss Army Knife” Composite Electronic-Structure Method

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Grimme ◽  
Andreas Hansen ◽  
Sebastian Ehlert ◽  
Jan-Michael Mewes
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Structure ◽  
Density Functional ◽  
Chemical Space ◽  
Noncovalent Interactions ◽  
New Method ◽  
Basis Set ◽  
Basis Set Superposition Error ◽  
Benchmark Database ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Conformational Energies

The recently proposed second revision of the SCAN meta-GGA density-functional approximation (DFA) {Furness et al., J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 8208-8215, termed r<sup>2</sup>SCAN} is used to construct an efficient composite electronic-structure method termed r<sup>2</sup>SCAN-3c, expanding the "3c'' series (hybrid: HSE/PBEh-3c, GGA: B97-3c, HF: HF-3c) to themGGA level. To this end, the unaltered r<sup>2</sup>SCAN functional is combined with a tailor-made <br>triple-zeta Gaussian AO-basis as well as with refitted D4 and gCP corrections for London-dispersion and basis-set superposition error. The performance of the new method is evaluated for the GMTKN55 thermochemical database covering large parts of chemical space with about 1500 <br>data points, as well as additional benchmarks for noncovalent interactions, organometallic reactions, lattice energies of organic molecules and ices, as well as for the adsorption on polar salt and non-polar coinage-metal surfaces. These comprehensive tests reveal a spectacular performance and robustness of r<sup>2</sup>SCAN-3c for reaction energies and noncovalent interactions in molecular and periodic systems, as well as outstanding conformational energies, and consistent structures. At just one tenth of the cost, r<sup>2</sup>SCAN-3c provides one of the best results of all semi-local DFT/QZ methods ever tested for the GMTKN55 benchmark database. Specifically for reaction and conformational energies as well as for noncovalent interactions, the new method outperforms hybrid-DFT/QZ approaches, compared to which the computational savings are even larger (factor 100-1000).<br>In relation to other "3c'' methods, r<sup>2</sup>SCAN-3c by far surpasses the accuracy of its predecessor B97-3c at only about twice the cost. The perhaps most relevant remaining systematic deviation of r<sup>2</sup>SCAN-3c is due to self-interaction-error, owing to its mGGA nature. However, SIE is notably reduced compared to other (m)GGAs, as is demonstrated for several examples. After all, this remarkably efficient and robust method is chosen as our new group default, replacing previous low-level DFT and partially even expensive high-level methods in most standard applications for systems with up to several hundreds of atoms.<br><br>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document