Evolution of the northern Cordilleran foreland basin during the middle Cretaceous

2009 ◽  
Vol 121 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 483-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongtai Yang ◽  
Andrew D. Miall
Keyword(s):  
Foreland Basin ◽  
Cordilleran Foreland

Evolution of the Cordilleran foreland basin system in northwestern Montana, U.S.A.

2010 ◽  
Vol 123 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 507-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Fuentes ◽  
P. G. DeCelles ◽  
K. N. Constenius ◽  
G. E. Gehrels
Keyword(s):  
Foreland Basin ◽  
Northwestern Montana ◽  
Cordilleran Foreland ◽  
Basin System

FLEXURAL PARTITIONING OF THE LATE ALBIAN-CENOMANIAN CORDILLERAN FORELAND-BASIN SYSTEM, UTAH, WYOMING, AND COLORADO

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jared Timothy Wink ◽  
◽  
Wrik Chatterjee ◽  
Sutton Chiorini ◽  
Lyndsey Farrar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Foreland Basin ◽  
Cordilleran Foreland ◽  
Basin System

The flexural margin, the foredeep, and the orogenic margin of a northern Cordilleran foreland basin: Cretaceous tectonostratigraphy and detrital zircon provenance, northwestern Canada

2014 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
pp. 173-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Hadlari ◽  
Bernard C. MacLean ◽  
Jennifer M. Galloway ◽  
Arthur R. Sweet ◽  
James M. White ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Detrital Zircon ◽  
Foreland Basin ◽  
Cordilleran Foreland

scholarly journals A magnetostratigraphic age constraint for the proximal synorogenic conglomerates of the Late Cretaceous Cordilleran foreland basin, northeast Utah, USA

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziaul Haque ◽  
John W. Geissman ◽  
Peter G. DeCelles ◽  
Barbara Carrapa
Keyword(s):  
Late Cretaceous ◽  
Foreland Basin ◽  
Magnetic Polarity ◽  
Coarse Grained ◽  
Sediment Provenance ◽  
Fine Grained ◽  
Magnetic Carriers ◽  
Normal Polarity ◽  
Cordilleran Foreland ◽  
Geomagnetic Polarity

Reliable ages of proximal conglomerates in the Cordilleran foreland basin that are associated with emplacement and erosion of major thrust sheets are essential for reconstructing the kinematic history of the Sevier fold-thrust belt. Although these conglomerates have been dated by palynology, their absolute ages have been difficult to determine because of their coarse-grained texture and a lack of marine interbeds and tuffaceous deposits. We collected sets of oriented samples from outcrops in northeastern Utah, USA, to construct an overall magnetic polarity stratigraphy that can be correlated to the geomagnetic polarity time scale (GPTS). We sampled fine-grained, hematitic interbeds in the Upper Cretaceous Echo Canyon Conglomerate and Weber Canyon Conglomerate. Common paleomagnetic and rock magnetic analyses were conducted, and several rock magnetic results indicated that the dominant magnetic carriers in these weakly magnetized rocks are hematite and very subordinate magnetite/titanomagnetite/maghemite and goethite. Demagnetization results show that hematitic, fine-grained sandstone to siltstone intervals carry a geologically stable magnetization with directions and polarity consistent with the Late Cretaceous geomagnetic field. A small percentage of samples carry a low laboratory unblocking temperature secondary overprint residing primarily in goethite. Magnetic polarity results indicate that the Echo Canyon Conglomerate is exclusively of normal polarity and that the younger Weber Canyon Conglomerate is of normal polarity in its lowermost part, reverse polarity in the middle, and normal polarity in the upper part of the sequence. The new data indicate that these coarse-grained strata were most likely deposited over the time span of the magnetic polarity Chron (C) 34n to C33r interval and the younger C33r to C33n interval; the former interval includes the Santonian-Campanian stage boundary (ca. 83.4 Ma/83.1 Ma). Palynological data suggest that these rocks span Coniacian-Santonian time (ca. 89−84 Ma); thus, the most parsimonious correlation of the normal polarity magnetozone of the Echo Canyon Conglomerate is with the youngest part of C34n Superchron, which is of ca. 30 Ma duration (ca. 115 Ma to 83.4 Ma/83.1 Ma). The normal polarity magnetozone of the lower part of the younger Weber Canyon Conglomerate likely correlates to the youngest part of C34n, whereas the reverse and normal magnetozone from the middle and upper parts of the Weber Canyon Conglomerate likely correlate to C33r and C33n, respectively. We infer that the Santonian-Campanian boundary resides in the lower Weber Canyon Conglomerate, which implies that deposition of the unit started prior to the C34n/C33r boundary age (ca. 83.4 Ma/83.1 Ma) and continued through the C33r and C33n chrons. Sediment provenance data and growth structures tie the Echo Canyon and Weber Canyon Conglomerates to emplacement of the Crawford thrust sheet. Based on the magnetic polarity data, as constrained by the biostratigraphic age estimates from these synorogenic deposits, we hypothesize that the principal displacement along the Crawford thrust started during the Coniacian (>C34n/C33r boundary age) and continued into the middle Campanian (<C33r/C33n boundary age), from ca. 90−75 Ma, which is nearly 10 Ma longer than previously thought. The new age constraints demonstrate complete temporal overlap between proximal and distal coarse-grained deposits in this part of the Cordilleran foreland basin, coeval with active thrust displacement and rapid hinterland exhumation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document