Clinical Laboratory Management

2006 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-97
Author(s):  
Christian T. K.-H. Stadtländer
2006 ◽  
Vol 130 (12) ◽  
pp. 1756-1761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce A. Jones ◽  
Molly K. Walsh ◽  
Stephen G. Ruby

Abstract Context.—Monitoring customer satisfaction is an important and useful quality improvement tool and is required of most clinical laboratories in the United States. Objective.—To survey the level of nursing satisfaction with hospital clinical laboratory services. Design.—Participating laboratories provided information regarding laboratory demographics and practices. These laboratories then surveyed hospital nursing personnel regarding their level of satisfaction with defined aspects of laboratory service. Setting.—College of American Pathologists Q-Probes laboratory quality improvement study in 162 hospital laboratories. Main Outcome Measures.—Nursing overall satisfaction score (ranging from 1, not satisfied, to 5, very satisfied) and satisfaction scores for 13 specific aspects of clinical laboratory services. Results.—One hundred sixty-two institutions submitted data from a total of 7033 nursing surveys. The overall satisfaction score for all institutions ranged from 2.5 to 4.6. The median overall score for all participants was 3.9 (10th percentile, 3.2; 90th percentile, 4.2). Nursing personnel were most satisfied with the accuracy of test results, phlebotomy courtesy toward patients and nursing staff, and notification of abnormal results. They were least satisfied with stat test turnaround time, laboratory management responsiveness and accessibility, phlebotomy responsiveness to service requests, and routine test turnaround time. The most important aspect of laboratory service reported by nursing personnel was stat test turnaround time. Conclusions.—Most nursing personnel are satisfied with the clinical laboratory services that are provided to the patients in their care. Although test result accuracy is very highly regarded, there is room for improvement in several aspects of service, particularly in test turnaround time and laboratory management accessibility and responsiveness.


1989 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 99-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. de Cediel ◽  
C. G. Fraser ◽  
A. Deom ◽  
L. Josefsson ◽  
H. G. J. Worth ◽  
...  

Trainees in laboratory medicine must develop skills in laboratory management. Guidelines are detailed for laboratory staff in training, directors responsible for staff development and professional bodies wishing to generate material appropriate to their needs. The syllabus delineates the knowledge base required and includes laboratory planning and organization, control of operations, methodology and instrumentation, data management and statistics, financial management, clinical use of tests, communication, personnel management and training and research and development. Methods for achievement of the skills required are suggested. A bibliography of IFCC publications and other material is provided to assist in training in laboratory management.


1976 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur F. Krieg ◽  
Michael Israel ◽  
Ronald Fink

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 237428951664462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arvind Rishi ◽  
Syed T. Hoda ◽  
James M. Crawford

Author(s):  
Mᵃ Liboria López Yeste ◽  
Silvia Izquierdo Álvarez ◽  
Antonia R. Pons Mas ◽  
Luisa Álvarez Domínguez ◽  
Fernando Marqués García ◽  
...  

Abstract The objective of this paper is to share some considerations about the management of postanalytical processes in relation to the review, reporting and release of test results in accordance with UNE-EN ISO 15189:2013 Standard requirements. The scope of this paper includes postanalytical activities and the personnel involved (laboratory management and staff). We describe the criteria and information required to review and validate analytical results and ensure that clear reports are sent to requesters. These criteria also guarantee that results are transcribed in a reliable way and that all necessary information is provided for the correct interpretation of results. Likewise, the requirements for the correct release of laboratory results are described, with special emphasis on the release of alarming or critical results. In some European countries, clinical laboratories are required to hold partial or full ISO 15189 accreditation, which is a global trend. Therefore, understanding ISO 15189 requirements is imperative for a progressive and more effective implementation of the Standard.


Author(s):  
Carmen Ricós ◽  
Montserrat García-Victoria ◽  
Blanca de la Fuente

AbstractExamples of indicators and specifications for the post-analytical process:


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document