scholarly journals The Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome Controls Repair and Recombination by Ubiquitylating Rhp54 in Fission Yeast

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 3905-3916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Trickey ◽  
Margaret Grimaldi ◽  
Hiroyuki Yamano
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Meiotic Chromosome ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Damaging Agents ◽  
Diploid Cells ◽  
Sister Chromatid Recombination

ABSTRACT Homologous recombination (HR) is important for maintaining genome integrity and for the process of meiotic chromosome segregation and the generation of variation. HR is regulated throughout the cell cycle, being prevalent in the S and G2 phases and suppressed in the G1 phase. Here we show that the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) regulates homologous recombination in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe by ubiquitylating Rhp54 (an ortholog of Rad54). We show that Rhp54 is a novel APC/C substrate that is destroyed in G1 phase in a KEN-box- and Ste9/Fizzy-related manner. The biological consequences of failing to temporally regulate HR via Rhp54 degradation are seen in haploid cells only in the absence of antirecombinase Srs2 function and are more extensive in diploid cells, which become sensitive to a range of DNA-damaging agents, including hydroxyurea, methyl methanesulfonate, bleomycin, and UV. During meiosis, expression of nondegradable Rhp54 inhibits interhomolog recombination and stimulates sister chromatid recombination. We thus propose that it is critical to control levels of Rhp54 in G1 to suppress HR repair of double-strand breaks and during meiosis to coordinate interhomolog recombination.

scholarly journals Targeted Inactivation of Mouse RAD52Reduces Homologous Recombination but Not Resistance to Ionizing Radiation

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 6423-6429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tonnie Rijkers ◽  
Jody Van Den Ouweland ◽  
Bruno Morolli ◽  
Anton G. Rolink ◽  
Willy M. Baarends ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Es Cells ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Damaging Agents ◽  
Reduced Frequency ◽  
Null Mutant Mice ◽  
Targeted Inactivation ◽  
Resistance To Ionizing Radiation

ABSTRACT The RAD52 epistasis group is required for recombinational repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs) and shows strong evolutionary conservation. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, RAD52 is one of the key members in this pathway. Strains with mutations in this gene show strong hypersensitivity to DNA-damaging agents and defects in recombination. Inactivation of the mouse homologue of RAD52in embryonic stem (ES) cells resulted in a reduced frequency of homologous recombination. Unlike the yeast Scrad52 mutant,MmRAD52 −/− ES cells were not hypersensitive to agents that induce DSBs. MmRAD52 null mutant mice showed no abnormalities in viability, fertility, and the immune system. These results show that, as in S. cerevisiae, MmRAD52is involved in recombination, although the repair of DNA damage is not affected upon inactivation, indicating that MmRAD52 may be involved in certain types of DSB repair processes and not in others. The effect of inactivating MmRAD52 suggests the presence of genes functionally related to MmRAD52, which can partly compensate for the absence of MmRad52 protein.

scholarly journals ATR/Mec1 prevents lethal meiotic recombination initiation on partially replicated chromosomes in budding yeast

eLife ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah G Blitzblau ◽  
Andreas Hochwagen
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Meiotic Chromosome ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Rapid Loss ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Cdc7 Kinase

During gamete formation, crossover recombination must occur on replicated DNA to ensure proper chromosome segregation in the first meiotic division. We identified a Mec1/ATR- and Dbf4-dependent replication checkpoint in budding yeast that prevents the earliest stage of recombination, the programmed induction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), when pre-meiotic DNA replication was delayed. The checkpoint acts through three complementary mechanisms: inhibition of Mer2 phosphorylation by Dbf4-dependent Cdc7 kinase, preclusion of chromosomal loading of Rec114 and Mre11, and lowered abundance of the Spo11 nuclease. Without this checkpoint, cells formed DSBs on partially replicated chromosomes. Importantly, such DSBs frequently failed to be repaired and impeded further DNA synthesis, leading to a rapid loss in cell viability. We conclude that a checkpoint-dependent constraint of DSB formation to duplicated DNA is critical not only for meiotic chromosome assortment, but also to protect genome integrity during gametogenesis.

scholarly journals REC114 partner ANKRD31 controls number, timing and location of meiotic DNA breaks

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michiel Boekhout ◽  
Mehmet E. Karasu ◽  
Juncheng Wang ◽  
Laurent Acquaviva ◽  
Florencia Pratto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structure ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Meiotic Chromosome ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Pleckstrin Homology Domain ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Pseudoautosomal Regions ◽  
Genomic Locations

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) initiate the homologous recombination that is crucial for meiotic chromosome pairing and segregation. Here we unveil mouse ANKRD31 as a lynchpin governing multiple aspects of DSB formation. Spermatocytes lacking ANKRD31 have altered DSB locations and fail to target DSBs to sex chromosomes’ pseudoautosomal regions (PAR). They also have delayed/fewer recombination sites but, paradoxically, more DSBs, suggesting DSB dysregulation. Unrepaired DSBs and pairing failures—stochastic on autosomes, nearly absolute on X and Y—cause meiotic arrest and sterility in males. Ankrd31-deficient females have reduced oocyte reserves. A crystal structure defines direct ANKRD31– REC114 molecular contacts and reveals a surprising pleckstrin homology domain in REC114. In vivo, ANKRD31 stabilizes REC114 association with the PAR and elsewhere. Our findings inform a model that ANKRD31 is a scaffold anchoring REC114 and other factors to specific genomic locations, promoting efficient and timely DSB formation but possibly also suppressing formation of clustered DSBs.

scholarly journals Either Non-Homologous Ends Joining or Homologous Recombination Is Required to Repair Double-Strand Breaks in the Genome of Macrophage-Internalized Mycobacterium tuberculosis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. e92799 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Brzostek ◽  
Izabela Szulc ◽  
Magdalena Klink ◽  
Marta Brzezinska ◽  
Zofia Sulowska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks

scholarly journals End-resection at DNA double-strand breaks in the three domains of life

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 314-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
John K. Blackwood ◽  
Neil J. Rzechorzek ◽  
Sian M. Bray ◽  
Joseph D. Maman ◽  
Luca Pellegrini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Domains Of Life ◽  
Strand Invasion ◽  
End Resection

During DNA repair by HR (homologous recombination), the ends of a DNA DSB (double-strand break) must be resected to generate single-stranded tails, which are required for strand invasion and exchange with homologous chromosomes. This 5′–3′ end-resection of the DNA duplex is an essential process, conserved across all three domains of life: the bacteria, eukaryota and archaea. In the present review, we examine the numerous and redundant helicase and nuclease systems that function as the enzymatic analogues for this crucial process in the three major phylogenetic divisions.

Homologous recombination and the repair of double-strand breaks during cotransformation of Dictyostelium discoideum

1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 2779-2786
Author(s):  
K S Katz ◽  
D I Ratner
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Dictyostelium Discoideum ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Restriction Endonucleases ◽  
Linear Molecule ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Transformation Vector ◽  
Closed Circle ◽  
Primary Vector

We examined the ability of unlinked nonreplicating plasmid molecules to undergo homologous recombination during cotransformation of Dictyostelium amoebae. The transformation vector B10S confers resistance to the antibiotic G418 and was always presented to amoebae as a closed circle. Cotransforming DNA, containing a slime mold cDNA and sequences homologous to the primary vector, was presented either as a closed circle or as a linear molecule after digestion with restriction endonucleases which cut within one of three distinct regions of the plasmid. Remarkably, homologous recombination occurred in every clone examined. Moreover, the products of recombination were identical in all instances, irrespective of the presence or position of linearized ends. The ends of the linear templates were not recombinogenic. Repair of the introduced double-strand break occurred frequently during recombination. The repair could occur intermolecularly or, more likely, intramolecularly, i.e., by recircularization. Many of the recombination events were of a nonreciprocal nature. Despite the startlingly frequent level of homologous recombination, the use of cotransforming DNA which contains no homology to the selected vector established that such recombination was not required for cotransformation.

scholarly journals Numerical and Spatial Patterning of Yeast Meiotic DNA Breaks by Tel1

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeman Mohibullah ◽  
Scott Keeney
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Deep Sequencing ◽  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Spatial Patterning ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Context Dependent

AbstractThe Spo11-generated double-strand breaks (DSBs) that initiate meiotic recombination are dangerous lesions that can disrupt genome integrity, so meiotic cells regulate their number, timing, and distribution. Here, we use Spo11-oligonucleotide complexes, a byproduct of DSB formation, to examine the contribution of the DNA damage-responsive kinase Tel1 (ortholog of mammalian ATM) to this regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A tel1Δ mutant had globally increased amounts of Spo11-oligonucleotide complexes and altered Spo11-oligonucleotide lengths, consistent with conserved roles for Tel1 in control of DSB number and processing. A kinase-dead tell mutation also increased Spo11-oligonucleotide levels, but mutating known Tel1 phosphotargets on Hop1 and Rec114 did not. Deep sequencing of Spo11 oligonucleotides from tel1Δ mutants demonstrated that Tel1 shapes the nonrandom DSB distribution in ways that are distinct but partially overlapping with previously described contributions of the recombination regulator Zip3. Finally, we uncover a context-dependent role for Tel1 in hotspot competition, in which an artificial DSB hotspot inhibits nearby hotspots. Evidence for Tel1-dependent competition involving strong natural hotspots is also provided.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document