scholarly journals Eos, MITF, and PU.1 Recruit Corepressors to Osteoclast-Specific Genes in Committed Myeloid Progenitors

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 4018-4027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rong Hu ◽  
Sudarshana M. Sharma ◽  
Agnieszka Bronisz ◽  
Ruchika Srinivasan ◽  
Uma Sankar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Target Genes ◽  
Zinc Finger Protein ◽  
Osteoclast Differentiation ◽  
Direct Interaction ◽  
Cathepsin K ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Basal Expression ◽  
Rna Knockdown ◽  
Interfering Rna ◽  
Myeloid Progenitors

ABSTRACT Transcription factors MITF and PU.1 collaborate to increase expression of target genes like cathepsin K (Ctsk) and acid phosphatase 5 (Acp5) during osteoclast differentiation. We show that these factors can also repress transcription of target genes in committed myeloid precursors capable of forming either macrophages or osteoclasts. The direct interaction of MITF and PU.1 with the zinc finger protein Eos, an Ikaros family member, was necessary for repression of Ctsk and Acp5. Eos formed a complex with MITF and PU.1 at target gene promoters and suppressed transcription through recruitment of corepressors CtBP (C-terminal binding protein) and Sin3A, but during osteoclast differentiation, Eos association with Ctsk and Acp5 promoters was significantly decreased. Subsequently, MITF and PU.1 recruited coactivators to these target genes, resulting in robust expression of target genes. Overexpression of Eos in bone marrow-derived precursors disrupted osteoclast differentiation and selectively repressed transcription of MITF/PU.1 targets, while small interfering RNA knockdown of Eos resulted in increased basal expression of Ctsk and Acp5. This work provides a mechanism to account for the modulation of MITF and PU.1 activity in committed myeloid progenitors prior to the initiation of osteoclast differentiation in response to the appropriate extracellular signals.

scholarly journals The Effects of Dickkopf-4 on the Proliferation, Differentiation, and Apoptosis of Osteoblasts

Endocrinology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 154 (12) ◽  
pp. 4618-4626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiro Hiramitsu ◽  
Masakazu Terauchi ◽  
Toshiro Kubota
Keyword(s):  
Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Bone Formation ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Osteoblastic Cell ◽  
Osteoblastic Cell Line ◽  
Alkaline Phosphatase Assay ◽  
Proliferation And Differentiation ◽  
Phosphatase Assay ◽  
Rna Knockdown ◽  
Interfering Rna

The Dickkopf family of proteins is comprised of four members (Dkk1, Dkk2, Dkk3, Dkk4) that are known to modulate Wnt/β-catenin signaling, which is activated during bone formation. Although the effects of Dkk1 on Wnt/β-catenin signaling have been well studied, little is known about the effects of Dkk4. Therefore, to evaluate the role of Dkk4 in osteoblastogenesis, we used the mouse osteoblastic cell line MC3T3-E1, in which Dkk4 expression was suppressed by small interfering RNA knockdown. Our results showed that the suppression of Dkk4 expression promoted osteoblast proliferation and differentiation and suppressed apoptosis. In colony-forming unit alkaline phosphatase assay, Dkk4 knockdown cells possessed markedly higher alkaline phosphatase activity compared with Dkk1 knockdown cells. Reduced Dkk4 expression also led to the up-regulation of β-catenin levels, β-catenin/T cell factor activity, and Wnt-target genes. In contrast, overexpression of Dkk4 in MC3T3-E1 cells led to inhibition of osteoblast differentiation. Our findings reveal that Dkk4 functions as an inhibitor of osteoblastogenesis through Wnt/β-catenin signaling, providing new insights into the relationship between Wnt/β-catenin signaling and Dkk4 in bone formation.

scholarly journals Deficiency of optineurin enhances osteoclast differentiation by attenuating the NRF2-mediated antioxidant response

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Xue ◽  
Xiangxiang Hu ◽  
Emily Chang ◽  
Lufei Wang ◽  
Minghui Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Therapeutic Potential ◽  
Osteoclast Differentiation ◽  
Direct Interaction ◽  
Antioxidant Response ◽  
Tartrate Resistant Acid Phosphatase ◽  
Related Factor ◽  
Nuclear Factor ◽  
Degenerative Diseases ◽  
Qrt Pcr ◽  
Basal Expression

AbstractAbnormally increased resorption contributes to bone degenerative diseases such as Paget’s disease of bone (PDB) through unclear mechanisms. Recently, the optineurin (OPTN) gene has been implicated in PDB, and global OPTN knockout mice (Optn−/−) were shown to exhibit increased formation of osteoclasts (osteoclastogenesis). Growing evidence, including our own, has demonstrated that intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) stimulated by receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) can act as signaling molecules to promote osteoclastogenesis. Here, we report that OPTN interacts with nuclear factor erythroid-derived factor 2-related factor 2 (NRF2), the master regulator of the antioxidant response, defining a pathway through which RANKL-induced ROS could be regulated for osteoclastogenesis. In this study, monocytes from Optn−/− and wild-type (Optn+/+) mice were utilized to differentiate into osteoclasts, and both qRT-PCR and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining showed that the Optn−/− monocytes exhibited enhanced osteoclastogenesis compared to the Optn+/+ cells. CellROX® staining, qRT-PCR, and Western blotting indicated that OPTN deficiency reduced the basal expression of Nrf2, inhibited the expression of NRF2-responsive antioxidants, and increased basal and RANKL-induced intracellular ROS levels, leading to enhanced osteoclastogenesis. Coimmunoprecipitation (co-IP) showed direct interaction, and immunofluorescence staining showed perinuclear colocalization of the OPTN-NRF2 granular structures during differentiation. Finally, curcumin and the other NRF2 activators attenuated the hyperactive osteoclastogenesis induced by OPTN deficiency. Collectively, our findings reveal a novel OPTN-mediated mechanism for regulating the NRF2-mediated antioxidant response in osteoclasts and extend the therapeutic potential of OPTN in the aging process resulting from ROS-triggered oxidative stress, which is associated with PDB and many other degenerative diseases.

scholarly journals Amino Acid Residues Required for Physical and Cooperative Transcriptional Interaction of STAT3 and AP-1 Proteins c-Jun and c-Fos

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (18) ◽  
pp. 6300-6308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Ginsberg ◽  
Elmar Czeko ◽  
Patrick Müller ◽  
Zhiyong Ren ◽  
Xiaomin Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Target Genes ◽  
Amino Acid Residues ◽  
Chromosomal Dna ◽  
Protein Interfaces ◽  
Specific Contact ◽  
Dna Elements ◽  
Rna Knockdown ◽  
Interfering Rna ◽  
Chromosomal Loci

ABSTRACT Cooperation between STAT3 and c-Jun in driving transcription during transfection of reporter constructs is well established, and both proteins are present on some interleukin-6 (IL-6) STAT3-dependent promoters on chromosomal loci. We report that small interfering RNA knockdown of c-Jun or c-Fos diminishes IL-6 induction of some but not all STAT3-dependent mRNAs. Specific contact sites in STAT3 responsible for interaction of a domain of STAT3 with c-Jun were known. Here we show that the B-zip domain of c-Jun interacts with STAT3 and that c-Jun mutation R261A or R261D near but not in the DNA binding domain blocks in vitro STAT3-c-Jun interaction and decreases costimulation of transcription in transfection assays. Cooperative binding to DNA of tyrosine-phosphorylated STAT3 and both wild-type and R261A mutant c-Jun was observed. Even c-Jun mutant R261D, which on its own did not bind DNA, bound DNA weakly in the presence of STAT3. We conclude that a functional interaction between STAT3 and c-Jun while bound to chromosomal DNA elements exists and is necessary for driving transcription on at least some STAT3 target genes. Identifying such required interactive protein interfaces should be a stimulus to search for compounds that could ultimately inhibit the activity of STAT3 in tumors dependent on persistently active STAT3.

scholarly journals Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α mRNA: a new target for destabilization by tristetraprolin in endothelial cells

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (18) ◽  
pp. 3366-3378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandrine Chamboredon ◽  
Delphine Ciais ◽  
Agnès Desroches-Castan ◽  
Pierre Savi ◽  
Françoise Bono ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endothelial Cells ◽  
Half Life ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Hypoxia Inducible Factor ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Hypoxia Inducible Factor 1Α ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Ca Ix ◽  
Rna Knockdown ◽  
Interfering Rna

Endothelial cells (ECs) are the primary sensors of variations in blood oxygen concentrations. They use the hypoxia-sensitive stabilization of the hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) transcription factor to engage specific transcriptional programs in response to oxygen changes. The regulation of HIF-1α expression is well documented at the protein level, but much less is known about the control of its mRNA stability. Using small interfering RNA knockdown experiments, reporter gene analyses, ribonucleoprotein immunoprecipitations, and mRNA half-life determinations, we report a new regulatory mechanism of HIF-1α expression in ECs. We demonstrate that 1) sustained hypoxia progressively decreases HIF-1α mRNA while HIF-1α protein levels rapidly peak after 3 h and then slowly decay; 2) silencing the mRNA-destabilizing protein tristetraprolin (TTP) in ECs reverses hypoxia-induced down-regulation of HIF-1α mRNA; 3) the decrease in the half-life of Luciferase-HIF-1α-3′UTR reporter transcript that is observed after prolonged hypoxia is mediated by TTP; 4) TTP binds specifically to HIF-1α 3′UTR; and 5) the most distal AU-rich elements present in HIF-1α 3′UTR (composed of two hexamers) are sufficient for TTP-mediated repression. Finally, we bring evidence that silencing TTP expression enhances hypoxia-induced increase in HIF-1α protein levels with a concomitant increase in the levels of the carbonic anhydrase enzyme CA IX, thus suggesting that TTP physiologically controls the expression of a panel of HIF-1α target genes. Altogether, these data reveal a new role for TTP in the control of gene expression during the response of endothelial cell to hypoxia.

scholarly journals Spi-1 and Fli-1 Directly Activate Common Target Genes Involved in Ribosome Biogenesis in Friend Erythroleukemic Cells

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 2852-2864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaëtan Juban ◽  
Guillaume Giraud ◽  
Boris Guyot ◽  
Stéphane Belin ◽  
Jean-Jacques Diaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Transcriptome Profiling ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Ets Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding Site ◽  
Friend Erythroleukemic Cells ◽  
Interfering Rna ◽  
Erythroleukemic Cells

ABSTRACT Spi-1 and Fli-1 are ETS transcription factors recurrently deregulated in mouse erythroleukemia induced by Friend viruses. Since they share the same core DNA binding site, we investigated whether they may contribute to erythroleukemia by common mechanisms. Using inducible knockdown, we demonstrated that Fli-1 contributes to proliferation, survival, and differentiation arrest of erythroleukemic cells harboring an activated fli-1 locus. Similarly, we used inducible Fli-1 knockdown and either hexamethylenebisacetamide (HMBA)- or small interfering RNA-mediated Spi-1 knockdown to investigate their respective contributions in erythroleukemic cells harboring an activated spi-1 locus. In these cells, simple or double knockdown of both Spi-1 and Fli-1 additively contributed to induce proliferation arrest and differentiation. Transcriptome profiling revealed that virtually all transcripts affected by both Fli-1 knockdown and HMBA are affected in an additive manner. Among these additively downregulated transcripts, more than 20% encode proteins involved in ribosome biogenesis, and conserved ETS binding sites are present in their gene promoters. Through chromatin immunoprecipitation, we demonstrated the association of Spi-1 and Fli-1 on these promoters in Friend erythroleukemic cells. These data lead us to propose that the oncogenicity of Spi-1, Fli-1, and possibly other ETS transcription factors may involve their ability to stimulate ribosome biogenesis.

scholarly journals GCN2 drives macrophage and MDSC function and immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (42) ◽  
pp. eaax8189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Jo Halaby ◽  
Kebria Hezaveh ◽  
Sara Lamorte ◽  
M. Teresa Ciudad ◽  
Andreas Kloetgen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Macrophage Polarization ◽  
Suppressor Cells ◽  
Interferon Γ ◽  
Mass Cytometry ◽  
General Control ◽  
Immune Attack ◽  
Environmental Sensor ◽  
Rna Knockdown ◽  
Interfering Rna

General control nonderepressible 2 (GCN2) is an environmental sensor controlling transcription and translation in response to nutrient availability. Although GCN2 is a putative therapeutic target for immuno-oncology, its role in shaping the immune response to tumors is poorly understood. Here, we used mass cytometry, transcriptomics, and transcription factor–binding analysis to determine the functional impact of GCN2 on the myeloid phenotype and immune responses in melanoma. We found that myeloid-lineage deletion of GCN2 drives a shift in the phenotype of tumor-associated macrophages and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) that promotes antitumor immunity. Time-of-flight mass cytometry (CyTOF) and single-cell RNA sequencing showed that this was due to changes in the immune microenvironment with increased proinflammatory activation of macrophages and MDSCs and interferon-γ expression in intratumoral CD8+ T cells. Mechanistically, GCN2 altered myeloid function by promoting increased translation of the transcription factor CREB-2/ATF4, which was required for maturation and polarization of macrophages and MDSCs in both mice and humans, whereas targeting Atf4 by small interfering RNA knockdown reduced tumor growth. Last, analysis of patients with cutaneous melanoma showed that GCN2-dependent transcriptional signatures correlated with macrophage polarization, T cell infiltrates, and overall survival. Thus, these data reveal a previously unknown dependence of tumors on myeloid GCN2 signals for protection from immune attack.

scholarly journals Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Ray-Jones ◽  
Mikhail Spivakov
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Functional Genomics ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Gene Control ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Joint Effects ◽  
Transcriptional Enhancers ◽  
Quantitative Understanding ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Way

AbstractTranscriptional enhancers play a key role in the initiation and maintenance of gene expression programmes, particularly in metazoa. How these elements control their target genes in the right place and time is one of the most pertinent questions in functional genomics, with wide implications for most areas of biology. Here, we synthesise classic and recent evidence on the regulatory logic of enhancers, including the principles of enhancer organisation, factors that facilitate and delimit enhancer–promoter communication, and the joint effects of multiple enhancers. We show how modern approaches building on classic insights have begun to unravel the complexity of enhancer–promoter relationships, paving the way towards a quantitative understanding of gene control.

Androgen receptor: acting in the three-dimensional chromatin landscape of prostate cancer cells

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Harri Makkonen ◽  
Jorma J. Palvimo
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Loop Formation ◽  
Prostate Cancer Cells

AbstractAndrogen receptor (AR) acts as a hormone-controlled transcription factor that conveys the messages of both natural and synthetic androgens to the level of genes and gene programs. Defective AR signaling leads to a wide array of androgen insensitivity disorders, and deregulated AR function, in particular overexpression of AR, is involved in the growth and progression of prostate cancer. Classic models of AR action view AR-binding sites as upstream regulatory elements in gene promoters or their proximity. However, recent wider genomic screens indicate that AR target genes are commonly activated through very distal chromatin-binding sites. This highlights the importance of long-range chromatin regulation of transcription by the AR, shifting the focus from the linear gene models to three-dimensional models of AR target genes and gene programs. The capability of AR to regulate promoters from long distances in the chromatin is particularly important when evaluating the role of AR in the regulation of genes in malignant prostate cells that frequently show striking genomic aberrations, especially gene fusions. Therefore, in addition to the mechanisms of DNA loop formation between the enhancer bound ARs and the transcription apparatus at the target core promoter, the mechanisms insulating distally bound ARs from promiscuously making contacts and activating other than their normal target gene promoters are critical for proper physiological regulation and thus currently under intense investigation. This review discusses the current knowledge about the AR action in the context of gene aberrations and the three-dimensional chromatin landscape of prostate cancer cells.

scholarly journals BRG1 Controls the Activity of the Retinoblastoma Protein via Regulation of p21CIP1/WAF1/SDI

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 1188-1199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyeog Kang ◽  
Kairong Cui ◽  
Keji Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Cellular Proliferation ◽  
Growth Arrest ◽  
Retinoblastoma Protein ◽  
Direct Interaction ◽  
Physical Interaction ◽  
Cdk Inhibitor ◽  
Regulation Of Cell Cycle

ABSTRACT The ubiquitous mammalian chromatin-remodeling SWI/SNF-like BAF complexes play critical roles in tumorigenesis. It was suggested that the direct interaction of BRG1 with the retinoblastoma protein pRB is required for regulation of cell cycle progression by pRB. We present evidence that the BRG1-containing complexes regulate the expression of the cdk inhibitor p21CIP1/WAF1/SDI. Furthermore, we show that the physical interaction between BRG1 and pRB is not required for induction of cell growth arrest and transcriptional repression of E2F target genes by pRB. Instead, BRG1 activates pRB by inducing its hypophosphorylation through up-regulation of the cdk inhibitor p21. The hypophosphorylation of pRB is reinforced by down-regulation of critical components, including cdk2, cyclin E, and cyclin D, in the pRB regulatory network. We demonstrate that up-regulation of p21 by BRG1 is necessary to induce formation of flat cells, growth arrest, and finally, cell senescence. Our results suggest that the BRG1-containing complexes control cellular proliferation and senescence by modulating the pRB pathway via multiple mechanisms.

scholarly journals Target Gene Specificity of E2F and Pocket Protein Family Members in Living Cells

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (16) ◽  
pp. 5797-5807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Wells ◽  
Kathryn E. Boyd ◽  
Christopher J. Fry ◽  
Stephanie M. Bartley ◽  
Peggy J. Farnham
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Target Gene ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Current Model ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Living Cells ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Pocket Protein ◽  
Protein Dna Interactions

ABSTRACT E2F-mediated transcription is thought to involve binding of an E2F-pocket protein complex to promoters in the G0 phase of the cell cycle and release of the pocket protein in late G1, followed by release of E2F in S phase. We have tested this model by monitoring protein-DNA interactions in living cells using a formaldehyde cross-linking and immunoprecipitation assay. We find that E2F target genes are bound by distinct E2F-pocket protein complexes which change as cells progress through the cell cycle. We also find that certain E2F target gene promoters are bound by pocket proteins when such promoters are transcriptionally active. Our data indicate that the current model applies only to certain E2F target genes and suggest that Rb family members may regulate transcription in both G0 and S phases. Finally, we find that a given promoter can be bound by one of several different E2F-pocket protein complexes at a given time in the cell cycle, suggesting that cell cycle-regulated transcription is a stochastic, not a predetermined, process.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document