scholarly journals Brd4 Recruits P-TEFb to Chromosomes at Late Mitosis To Promote G1 Gene Expression and Cell Cycle Progression

2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 967-976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyuan Yang ◽  
Nanhai He ◽  
Qiang Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Transcriptional Elongation ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cyclin T1 ◽  
General Transcription Factors ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Active Transcription ◽  
Late Mitosis

ABSTRACT Brd4, a bromodomain protein capable of interacting with acetylated histones, is implicated in transmitting epigenetic memory through mitosis. It also functions as an associated factor and positive regulator of P-TEFb, a Cdk9-cyclin T1 heterodimer that stimulates transcriptional elongation by phosphorylating RNA polymerase II. In the present study, experiments were performed to determine whether these two functions of Brd4 are interrelated and, if so, how they may impact cell cycle progression. Our data demonstrate that while the P-TEFb level remains constant, the Brd4-P-TEFb interaction increases dramatically in cells progressing from late mitosis to early G1. Concurrently, P-TEFb is recruited to chromosomes, beginning around mid- to late anaphase and before nuclear envelope/lamina formation and nuclear import of other general transcription factors. Importantly, the recruitment of P-TEFb depends on Brd4. Abrogation of this process through Brd4 knockdown reduces the binding of P-TEFb to and expression of key G1 and growth-associated genes, leading to G1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Because P-TEFb is synonymous with productive elongation, its recruitment by Brd4 to chromosomes at late mitosis may indicate those genes whose active transcription status must be preserved across cell division.

scholarly journals Hyperbaric oxygen promotes not only glioblastoma proliferation but also chemosensitization by inhibiting HIF1α/HIF2α-Sox2

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pan Wang ◽  
Sheng Gong ◽  
Jinyu Pan ◽  
Junwei Wang ◽  
Dewei Zou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Hyperbaric Oxygen ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Malignant Progression ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Chemotherapy Sensitivity ◽  
Hypoxic Conditions ◽  
Cycle Arrest

AbstractThere exists a consensus that combining hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) and chemotherapy promotes chemotherapy sensitivity in GBM cells. However, few studies have explored the mechanism involved. HIF1α and HIF2α are the two main molecules that contribute to GBM malignant progression by inhibiting apoptosis or maintaining stemness under hypoxic conditions. Moreover, Sox2, a marker of stemness, also contributes to GBM malignant progression through stemness maintenance or cell cycle arrest. Briefly, HIF1α, HIF2α and Sox2 are highly expressed under hypoxia and contribute to GBM growth and chemoresistance. However, after exposure to HBO for GBM, whether the expression of the above factors is decreased, resulting in chemosensitization, remains unknown. Therefore, we performed a series of studies and determined that the expression of HIF1α, HIF2α and Sox2 was decreased after HBO and that HBO promoted GBM cell proliferation through cell cycle progression, albeit with a decrease in stemness, thus contributing to chemosensitization via the inhibition of HIF1α/HIF2α-Sox2.

scholarly journals Influenza A Virus Replication Induces Cell Cycle Arrest in G0/G1 Phase

2010 ◽  
Vol 84 (24) ◽  
pp. 12832-12840 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan He ◽  
Ke Xu ◽  
Bjoern Keiner ◽  
Jianfang Zhou ◽  
Volker Czudai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Influenza A Virus ◽  
Influenza A ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Virus Production ◽  
Phase Cell ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Infected Cells

ABSTRACT Many viruses interact with the host cell division cycle to favor their own growth. In this study, we examined the ability of influenza A virus to manipulate cell cycle progression. Our results show that influenza A virus A/WSN/33 (H1N1) replication results in G0/G1-phase accumulation of infected cells and that this accumulation is caused by the prevention of cell cycle entry from G0/G1 phase into S phase. Consistent with the G0/G1-phase accumulation, the amount of hyperphosphorylated retinoblastoma protein, a necessary active form for cell cycle progression through late G1 into S phase, decreased after infection with A/WSN/33 (H1N1) virus. In addition, other key molecules in the regulation of the cell cycle, such as p21, cyclin E, and cyclin D1, were also changed and showed a pattern of G0/G1-phase cell cycle arrest. It is interesting that increased viral protein expression and progeny virus production in cells synchronized in the G0/G1 phase were observed compared to those in either unsynchronized cells or cells synchronized in the G2/M phase. G0/G1-phase cell cycle arrest is likely a common strategy, since the effect was also observed in other strains, such as H3N2, H9N2, PR8 H1N1, and pandemic swine H1N1 viruses. These findings, in all, suggest that influenza A virus may provide favorable conditions for viral protein accumulation and virus production by inducing a G0/G1-phase cell cycle arrest in infected cells.

Deregulated expression of the RanBP1 gene alters cell cycle progression in murine fibroblasts

1997 ◽  
Vol 110 (19) ◽  
pp. 2345-2357 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Battistoni ◽  
G. Guarguaglini ◽  
F. Degrassi ◽  
C. Pittoggi ◽  
A. Palena ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Protein Import ◽  
Proliferating Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Ran Gtpase ◽  
Genes Encoding ◽  
Active Transcription ◽  
Gtpase Cycle

RanBP1 is a molecular partner of the Ran GTPase, which is implicated in the control of several processes, including DNA replication, mitotic entry and exit, cell cycle progression, nuclear structure, protein import and RNA export. While most genes encoding Ran-interacting partners are constitutively active, transcription of the RanBP1 mRNA is repressed in non proliferating cells, is activated at the G1/S transition in cycling cells and peaks during S phase. We report here that forced expression of the RanBP1 gene disrupts the orderly execution of the cell division cycle at several stages, causing inhibition of DNA replication, defective mitotic exit and failure of chromatin decondensation during the telophase-to-interphase transition in cells that achieve nuclear duplication and chromosome segregation. These results suggest that deregulated RanBP1 activity interferes with the Ran GTPase cycle and prevents the functioning of the Ran signalling system during the cell cycle.

scholarly journals Mutagenesis of ARS2 Domains To Assess Possible Roles in Cell Cycle Progression and MicroRNA and Replication-Dependent Histone mRNA Biogenesis

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (21) ◽  
pp. 3753-3767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Connor O'Sullivan ◽  
Jennifer Christie ◽  
Marcus Pienaar ◽  
Jake Gambling ◽  
Philip E. B. Nickerson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Rna Recognition Motif ◽  
Rna Recognition ◽  
Histone Mrna ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Transcript Processing ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Domain Of Unknown Function

ARS2 is a regulator of RNA polymerase II transcript processing through its role in the maturation of distinct nuclear cap-binding complex (CBC)-controlled RNA families. In this study, we examined ARS2 domain function in transcript processing. Structural modeling based on the plant ARS2 orthologue, SERRATE, revealed 2 previously uncharacterized domains in mammalian ARS2: an N-terminal domain of unknown function (DUF3546), which is also present in SERRATE, and an RNA recognition motif (RRM) that is present in metazoan ARS2 but not in plants. Both the DUF3546 and zinc finger domain (ZnF) were required for association with microRNA and replication-dependent histone mRNA. Mutations in the ZnF disrupted interaction with FLASH, a key component in histone pre-mRNA processing. Mutations targeting the Mid domain implicated it in DROSHA interaction and microRNA biogenesis. The unstructured C terminus was required for interaction with the CBC protein CBP20, while the RRM was required for cell cycle progression and for binding to FLASH. Together, our results support a bridging model in which ARS2 plays a central role in RNA recognition and processing through multiple protein and RNA interactions.

scholarly journals Analysis of Cell Cycle and Replication of Mouse Macrophages afterIn VivoandIn VitroCryptococcus neoformans Infection Using Laser Scanning Cytometry

2012 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 1467-1478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Coelho ◽  
Lydia Tesfa ◽  
Jinghang Zhang ◽  
Johanna Rivera ◽  
Teresa Gonçalves ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cytotoxic Effect ◽  
Laser Scanning ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Laser Scanning Cytometry

ABSTRACTWe investigated the outcome of the interaction ofCryptococcus neoformanswith murine macrophages using laser scanning cytometry (LSC). Previous results in our lab had shown that phagocytosis ofC. neoformanspromoted cell cycle progression. LSC allowed us to simultaneously measure the phagocytic index, macrophage DNA content, and 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) incorporation such that it was possible to study host cell division as a function of phagocytosis. LSC proved to be a robust, reliable, and high-throughput method for quantifying phagocytosis. Phagocytosis ofC. neoformanspromoted cell cycle progression, but infected macrophages were significantly less likely to complete mitosis. Hence, we report a new cytotoxic effect associated with intracellularC. neoformansresidence that manifested itself in impaired cell cycle completion as a consequence of a block in the G2/M stage of the mitotic cell cycle. Cell cycle arrest was not due to increased cell membrane permeability or DNA damage. We investigated alveolar macrophage replicationin vivoand demonstrated that these cells are capable of low levels of cell division in the presence or absence ofC. neoformansinfection. In summary, we simultaneously studied phagocytosis, the cell cycle state of the host cell and pathogen-mediated cytotoxicity, and our results demonstrate a new cytotoxic effect ofC. neoformansinfection on murine macrophages: fungus-induced cell cycle arrest. Finally, we provide evidence for alveolar macrophage proliferationin vivo.

scholarly journals Roquin1 Suppresses Breast Cancer Growth by Inducing Cell Cycle Arrest via Selectively Destabilizing Cell Cycle–Promoting Gene mRNAs

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenbao Lu ◽  
Meicen Zhou ◽  
Bing Wang ◽  
Xueting Liu ◽  
Bingwei Li
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Breast Cancer Cell ◽  
Breast Tumor ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest

Abstract Background: Dysregulation of cell cycle progression is one of the common features of human cancer cells, however, its mechanism remains unclear. This study aims to clarify the role and the underlying mechanisms of Roquin1 in cell cycle arrest induction in breast cancer.Methods: Public cancer databases were analyzed to identify the expression pattern of Roquin1 in human breast cancers and the significant association with patient survival. Quantitative real-time PCR and western blots were performed to detect the expression of Roquin1 in breast cancer samples and cell lines. Cell counting, MTT assay, flow cytometry, and in vivo study were conducted to investigate the effects of Roquin1 on cell proliferation, cell cycle progression and tumor progression. RNA-sequencing was applied to identify the differential genes and pathways regulated by Roquin1. RNA immunoprecipitation assay, luciferase reporter assay, mRNA half-life detection, RNA affinity binding assay, and RIP-ChIP were used to explore the molecular mechanisms of Roquin1.Results: We showed that Roquin1 expression in breast cancer tissues and cell lines was inhibited, and the reduction in Roquin1 expression was associated with poor overall survival and relapse free survival of patients with breast cancer. Roquin1 overexpression inhibited breast cancer cell proliferation and induced G1/S cell cycle arrest without causing significant apoptosis. In contrast, knockdown of Roquin1 promoted breast cancer cell growth and cycle progression. Moreover, in vivo induction of Roquin1 by adenovirus significantly suppressed breast tumor growth and metastasis. Mechanistically, Roquin1 selectively destabilizing cell cycle–promoting genes, including Cyclin D1, Cyclin E1, cyclin dependent kinase 6 (CDK6) and minichromosome maintenance 2 (MCM2) through targeting the stem–loop structure in the 3’untranslated region (3’UTR) of mRNAs via its ROQ domain, leading to the downregulation of cell cycle–promoting mRNAs.Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated that Roquin1 was a novel breast tumor suppressor and could induce G1/S cell cycle arrest by selectively downregulating the expression of cell cycle–promoting genes, which might as a potential molecular target for breast cancer treatment.

scholarly journals Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E7 Maintains Elevated Levels of the cdc25A Tyrosine Phosphatase during Deregulation of Cell Cycle Arrest

2002 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 619-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Don X. Nguyen ◽  
Thomas F. Westbrook ◽  
Dennis J. McCance
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Tyrosine Phosphatase ◽  
Early Gene ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Hpv 16 ◽  
Human Papillomavirus Type 16 ◽  
Cycle Arrest

ABSTRACT Essential to the oncogenic properties of human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) are the activities encoded by the early gene product E7. HPV-16 E7 (E7.16) binds to cellular factors involved in cell cycle regulation and differentiation. These include the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (Rb) and histone deacetylase (HDAC) complexes. While the biological significance of these interactions remains unclear, E7 is believed to help maintain cells in a proliferative state, thus establishing an environment that is conducive to viral replication. Most pathways that govern cell growth converge on downstream effectors. Among these is the cdc25A tyrosine phosphatase. cdc25A is required for G1/S transition, and its deregulation is associated with carcinogenesis. Considering the importance of cdc25A in cell cycle progression, it represents a relevant target for viral oncoproteins. Accordingly, the present study focuses on the putative deregulation of cdc25A by E7.16. Our results indicate that E7.16 can impede growth arrest induced during serum starvation and keratinocyte differentiation. Importantly, these E7-specific phenotypes correlate with elevated cdc25A steady-state levels. Reporter assays performed with NIH 3T3 cell lines and human keratinocytes indicate that E7 can transactivate the cdc25A promoter. In addition, transcriptional activation by E7.16 requires the distal E2F site within the cdc25A promoter. We further demonstrate that the ability of E7 to abrogate cell cycle arrest, activate cdc25A transcription, and increase cdc25A protein levels requires intact Rb and HDAC-1 binding domains. Finally, by using the cdk inhibitor roscovitine, we reveal that E7 activates the cdc25A promoter independently of cell cycle progression and cdk activity. Consequently, we propose that E7.16 can directly target cdc25A transcription and maintains cdc25A gene expression by disrupting Rb/E2F/HDAC-1 repressor complexes.

scholarly journals The RASSF6 Tumor Suppressor Protein Regulates Apoptosis and Cell Cycle Progression via Retinoblastoma Protein

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (17) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shakhawoat Hossain ◽  
Hiroaki Iwasa ◽  
Aradhan Sarkar ◽  
Junichi Maruyama ◽  
Kyoko Arimoto-Matsuzaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Tumor Suppressor ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
P53 Expression ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Hct116 Cells

ABSTRACT RASSF6 is a member of the tumor suppressor Ras association domain family (RASSF) proteins. RASSF6 is frequently suppressed in human cancers, and its low expression level is associated with poor prognosis. RASSF6 regulates cell cycle arrest and apoptosis and plays a tumor suppressor role. Mechanistically, RASSF6 blocks MDM2-mediated p53 degradation and enhances p53 expression. However, RASSF6 also induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in a p53-negative background, which implies that the tumor suppressor function of RASSF6 does not depend solely on p53. In this study, we revealed that RASSF6 mediates cell cycle arrest and apoptosis via pRb. RASSF6 enhances the interaction between pRb and protein phosphatase. RASSF6 also enhances P16INK4A and P14ARF expression by suppressing BMI1. In this way, RASSF6 increases unphosphorylated pRb and augments the interaction between pRb and E2F1. Moreover, RASSF6 induces TP73 target genes via pRb and E2F1 in a p53-negative background. Finally, we confirmed that RASSF6 depletion induces polyploid cells in p53-negative HCT116 cells. In conclusion, RASSF6 behaves as a tumor suppressor in cancers with loss of function of p53, and pRb is implicated in this function of RASSF6.

Abstract W P198: Sphingomyelin Synthases Regulate Neuronal Cell Proliferation and Cell Cycle Progression

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Umadevi V Wesley ◽  
Daniel Tremmel ◽  
Robert Dempsey
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Neuronal Cell ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cerebral Artery Occlusion

Introduction: The molecular mechanisms of cerebral ischemia damage and protection are not completely understood, but a number of reports implicate the contribution of lipid metabolism and cell-cycle regulating proteins in stroke out come. We have previously shown that tricyclodecan-9-yl-xanthogenate (D609) resulted in increased ceramide levels after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO) in spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR). We hypothesized that D609 induced cell cycle arrest probably by inhibiting sphingomyelin synthase (SMS). In this study, we examined the direct effects of SMS on cell cycle progression and proliferation of neuroblast cells. Methods: Ischemia was induced by middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) and reperfusion. Expression levels were measured by western blot analysis, RT-PCR, and Immunofluorescence staining. SMS1 and 2 expressions were silenced by stable transfection with SMS1/2-targeted shRNA. Cell cycle analysis was performed using Flow cytometry. Data were analyzed using MODFIT cell cycle analysis program. Cell proliferation rate was measured by MTT assay. Results: We have identified that the expression of SMS1is significantly up-regulated in the ischemic hemisphere following MCAO. Neuro-2a cells transfected with SMS specific ShRNA acquired more neuronal like phenotype and exhibited decreased proliferation rate. Also, silencing of both SMS1 and 2 induced cell-cycle arrest as shown by significantly increased percentage of cells in G0/G1 and decreased proportion of cells in S-phase as compared to control cells. This was accompanied by up-regulation of cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) inhibitors p21 and decreased levels of phophorylated AKT levels. Furthermore, loss of SMS inhibited the migratory potential of Neuro 2a cells. Summary: Up-regulation of SMS under ischemic/reperfusion conditions suggests that this enzyme potentially contributes to cell cycle regulation and may contribute to maintaining neuronal cell population. Further studies may open up a new direction for identifying the molecular mechanisms of cell cycle regulation and protection following ischemic stroke

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document