scholarly journals Estrogen Receptors Recruit SMRT and N-CoR Corepressors through Newly Recognized Contacts between the Corepressor N Terminus and the Receptor DNA Binding Domain

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 1434-1445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Varlakhanova ◽  
Chelsea Snyder ◽  
Soumia Jose ◽  
Johnnie B. Hahm ◽  
Martin L. Privalsky
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Estrogen Receptors ◽  
Nuclear Receptors ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Sites ◽  
Hormone Antagonists ◽  
Key Aspects ◽  
Hormone Binding Domain

ABSTRACT Estrogen receptors (ERs) are hormone-regulated transcription factors that regulate key aspects of reproduction and development. ERs are unusual in that they do not typically repress transcription in the absence of hormone but instead possess otherwise cryptic repressive functions that are revealed upon binding to certain hormone antagonists. The roles of corepressors in the control of these aspects of ER function are complex and incompletely understood. We report here that ERs recruit SMRT through an unusual mode of interaction involving multiple contact surfaces. Two surfaces of SMRT, located at the N- and C-terminal domains, contribute to the recruitment of the corepressor to ERs in vitro and are crucial for the corepressor modulation of ER transcriptional activity in cells. These corepressor surfaces contact the DNA binding domain of the receptor, rather than the hormone binding domain previously elucidated for other corepressor/nuclear receptor interactions, and are modulated by the ER's recognition of cognate DNA binding sites. Several additional nuclear receptors, and at least one other corepressor, N-CoR, share aspects of this novel mode of corepressor recruitment. Our results highlight a molecular mechanism that helps explain several previously paradoxical aspects of ER-mediated transcriptional antagonism, which may have a broader significance for an understanding of target gene repression by other nuclear receptors.

scholarly journals Transcriptional repression by Msx-1 does not require homeodomain DNA-binding sites.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 861-871 ◽  
Author(s):  
K M Catron ◽  
H Zhang ◽  
S C Marshall ◽  
J A Inostroza ◽  
J M Wilson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Specific Cell ◽  
Homeodomain Protein ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Sites

This study investigates the transcriptional properties of Msx-1, a murine homeodomain protein which has been proposed to play a key role in regulating the differentiation and/or proliferation state of specific cell populations during embryogenesis. We show, using basal and activated transcription templates, that Msx-1 is a potent repressor of transcription and can function through both TATA-containing and TATA-less promoters. Moreover, repression in vivo and in vitro occurs in the absence of DNA-binding sites for the Msx-1 homeodomain. Utilizing a series of truncated Msx-1 polypeptides, we show that multiple regions of Msx-1 contribute to repression, and these are rich in alanine, glycine, and proline residues. When fused to a heterologous DNA-binding domain, both N- and C-terminal regions of Msx-1 retain repressor function, which is dependent upon the presence of the heterologous DNA-binding site. Moreover, a polypeptide consisting of the full-length Msx-1 fused to a heterologous DNA-binding domain is a more potent repressor than either the N- or C-terminal regions alone, and this fusion retains the ability to repress transcription in the absence of the heterologous DNA site. We further show that Msx-1 represses transcription in vitro in a purified reconstituted assay system and interacts with protein complexes composed of TBP and TFIIA (DA) and TBP, TFIIA, and TFIIB (DAB) in gel retardation assays, suggesting that the mechanism of repression is mediated through interaction(s) with a component(s) of the core transcription complex. We speculate that the repressor function of Msx-1 is critical for its proposed role in embryogenesis as a regulator of cellular differentiation.

Reconstitution of transcriptional activation domains by reiteration of short peptide segments reveals the modular organization of a glutamine-rich activation domain

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 6056-6067
Author(s):  
M Tanaka ◽  
W Herr
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Pou Domain

The POU domain activator Oct-2 contains an N-terminal glutamine-rich transcriptional activation domain. An 18-amino-acid segment (Q18III) from this region reconstituted a fully functional activation domain when tandemly reiterated and fused to either the Oct-2 or GAL4 DNA-binding domain. A minimal transcriptional activation domain likely requires three tandem Q18III segments, because one or two tandem Q18III segments displayed little activity, whereas three to five tandem segments were active and displayed increasing activity with increasing copy number. As with natural Oct-2 activation domains, in our assay a reiterated activation domain required a second homologous or heterologous activation domain to stimulate transcription effectively when fused to the Oct-2 POU domain. These results suggest that there are different levels of synergy within and among activation domains. Analysis of reiterated activation domains containing mutated Q18III segments revealed that leucines and glutamines, but not serines or threonines, are critical for activity in vivo. Curiously, several reiterated activation domains that were inactive in vivo were active in vitro, suggesting that there are significant functional differences in our in vivo and in vitro assays. Reiteration of a second 18-amino-acid segment from the Oct-2 glutamine-rich activation domain (Q18II) was also active, but its activity was DNA-binding domain specific, because it was active when fused to the GAL4 than to the Oct-2 DNA-binding domain. The ability of separate short peptide segments derived from a single transcriptional activation domain to activate transcription after tandem reiteration emphasizes the flexible and modular nature of a transcriptional activation domain.

scholarly journals Cell Cycle Localization, Dimerization, and Binding Domain Architecture of the Telomere Protein cPot1

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 2091-2102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Wei ◽  
Carolyn M. Price
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Domain Architecture ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Binding Motif ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Telomere Protein ◽  
Ob Fold

ABSTRACT Pot1 is a single-stranded-DNA-binding protein that recognizes telomeric G-strand DNA. It is essential for telomere capping in Saccharomyces pombe and regulates telomere length in humans. Human Pot1 also interacts with proteins that bind the duplex region of the telomeric tract. Thus, like Cdc13 from S. cerevisiae, Pot 1 may have multiple roles at the telomere. We show here that endogenous chicken Pot1 (cPot1) is present at telomeres during periods of the cell cycle when t loops are thought to be present. Since cPot1 can bind internal loops and directly adjacent DNA-binding sites, it is likely to fully coat and protect both G-strand overhangs and the displaced G strand of a t loop. The minimum binding site of cPot1 is double that of the S. pombe DNA-binding domain. Although cPot can self associate, dimerization is not required for DNA binding and hence does not explain the binding-site duplication. Instead, the DNA-binding domain appears to be extended to contain a second binding motif in addition to the conserved oligonucleotide-oligosaccharide (OB) fold present in other G-strand-binding proteins. This second motif could be another OB fold. Although dimerization is inefficient in vitro, it may be regulated in vivo and could promote association with other telomere proteins and/or telomere compaction.

scholarly journals Transcriptional activation of the fra-1 gene by AP-1 is mediated by regulatory sequences in the first intron.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 3748-3758 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Bergers ◽  
P Graninger ◽  
S Braselmann ◽  
C Wrighton ◽  
M Busslinger
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Cellular Transformation ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Early Gene ◽  
Regulatory Sequences ◽  
In Vitro Mutagenesis ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
First Intron ◽  
Rat Fibroblasts

Constitutive expression of c-Fos, FosB, Fra-1, or c-Jun in rat fibroblasts leads to up-regulation of the immediate-early gene fra-1. Using the posttranslational FosER induction system, we demonstrate that this AP-1-dependent stimulation of fra-1 expression is rapid, depends on a functional DNA-binding domain of FosER, and is a general phenomenon observed in different cell types. In vitro mutagenesis and functional analysis of the rat fra-1 gene in stably transfected Rat-1A-FosER fibroblasts indicated that basal and AP-1-regulated expression of the fra-1 gene depends on regulatory sequences in the first intron which comprise a consensus AP-1 site and two AP-1-like elements. We have also investigated the transactivating and transforming properties of the Fra-1 protein to address the significance of fra-1 up-regulation. The entire Fra-1 protein fused to the DNA-binding domain of Ga14 is shown to lack any transactivation function, and yet it possesses oncogenic potential, as overexpression of Fra-1 in established rat fibroblasts results in anchorage-independent growth in vitro and tumor development in athymic mice, fra-1 is therefore not only induced by members of the Fos family, but its gene product may also contribute to cellular transformation by these proteins. Together, these data identify fra-1 as a unique member of the fos gene family which is under positive control by AP-1 activity.

scholarly journals Nuclear receptor phosphorylation in xenobiotic signal transduction

2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (45) ◽  
pp. 15210-15225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiko Negishi ◽  
Kaoru Kobayashi ◽  
Tsutomu Sakuma ◽  
Tatsuya Sueyoshi
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Cell Signaling ◽  
Nuclear Receptors ◽  
Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Pregnane X Receptor ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Activation Mechanism ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Phosphorylation Motif

Nuclear pregnane X receptor (PXR, NR1I2) and constitutive active/androstane receptor (CAR, NR1I3) are nuclear receptors characterized in 1998 by their capability to respond to xenobiotics and activate cytochrome P450 (CYP) genes. An anti-epileptic drug, phenobarbital (PB), activates CAR and its target CYP2B genes, whereas PXR is activated by drugs such as rifampicin and statins for the CYP3A genes. Inevitably, both nuclear receptors have been investigated as ligand-activated nuclear receptors by identifying and characterizing xenobiotics and therapeutics that directly bind CAR and/or PXR to activate them. However, PB, which does not bind CAR directly, presented an alternative research avenue for an indirect ligand-mediated nuclear receptor activation mechanism: phosphorylation-mediated signal regulation. This review summarizes phosphorylation-based mechanisms utilized by xenobiotics to elicit cell signaling. First, the review presents how PB activates CAR (and other nuclear receptors) through a conserved phosphorylation motif located between two zinc fingers within its DNA-binding domain. PB-regulated phosphorylation at this motif enables nuclear receptors to form communication networks, integrating their functions. Next, the review discusses xenobiotic-induced PXR activation in the absence of the conserved DNA-binding domain phosphorylation motif. In this case, phosphorylation occurs at a motif located within the ligand-binding domain to transduce cell signaling that regulates hepatic energy metabolism. Finally, the review delves into the implications of xenobiotic-induced signaling through phosphorylation in disease development and progression.

scholarly journals Mad proteins contain a dominant transcription repression domain.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 5772-5781 ◽  
Author(s):  
D E Ayer ◽  
C D Laherty ◽  
Q A Lawrence ◽  
A P Armstrong ◽  
R N Eisenman
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Full Length ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Interaction Domain ◽  
Transcription Repression ◽  
Helix Loop Helix ◽  
Repression Domain

Transcription repression by the basic region-helix-loop-helix-zipper (bHLHZip) protein Mad1 requires DNA binding as a ternary complex with Max and mSin3A or mSin3B, the mammalian orthologs of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcriptional corepressor SIN3. The interaction between Mad1 and mSin3 is mediated by three potential amphipathic alpha-helices: one in the N terminus of Mad (mSin interaction domain, or SID) and two within the second paired amphipathic helix domain (PAH2) of mSin3A. Mutations that alter the structure of the SID inhibit in vitro interaction between Mad and mSin3 and inactivate Mad's transcriptional repression activity. Here we show that a 35-residue region containing the SID represents a dominant repression domain whose activity can be transferred to a heterologous DNA binding region. A fusion protein comprising the Mad1 SID linked to a Ga14 DNA binding domain mediates repression of minimal as well as complex promoters dependent on Ga14 DNA binding sites. In addition, the SID represses the transcriptional activity of linked VP16 and c-Myc transactivation domains. When fused to a full-length c-Myc protein, the Mad1 SID specifically represses both c-Myc's transcriptional and transforming activities. Fusions between the GAL DNA binding domain and full-length mSin3 were also capable of repression. We show that the association between Mad1 and mSin3 is not only dependent on the helical SID but is also dependent on both putative helices of the mSin3 PAH2 region, suggesting that stable interaction requires all three helices. Our results indicate that the SID is necessary and sufficient for transcriptional repression mediated by the Mad protein family and that SID repression is dominant over several distinct transcriptional activators.

scholarly journals A specific and unusual nuclear localization signal in the DNA binding domain of the Rev-erb orphan receptors

2003 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Chopin-Delannoy ◽  
S Thenot ◽  
F Delaunay ◽  
E Buisine ◽  
A Begue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Fusion Protein ◽  
Nuclear Receptors ◽  
Nuclear Localization ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Protein Fusion ◽  
Orphan Receptors ◽  
Amino Terminal

The orphan receptors Rev-erbalpha and Rev-erbbeta are members of the nuclear receptors superfamily and act as transcriptional repressors. Rev-erbalpha is expressed with a robust circadian rhythm and is involved in liver metabolism through repression of the ApoA1 gene, but no role has been yet defined for Rev-erbbeta. To gain better understanding of their function and mode of action, we characterized the proteins encoded by these two genes. Both Rev-erbalpha and Rev-erbbeta proteins were nuclear when transiently transfected in COS-1 cells. The major nuclear location signal (NLS) of Rev-erbalpha is in the amino-terminal region of the protein. Fusion of green fluorescent protein (GFP) to the amino terminus of Rev-erbalpha deletion mutants showed that the NLS is located within a 53 amino acid segment of the DNA binding domain (DBD). The homologous region of Rev-erbbeta fused to GFP also targeted the fusion protein to the nucleus, suggesting that the location of this NLS is conserved among all the Rev-erb group members. Interestingly, members of the phylogenetically closest nuclear orphan receptor group (ROR), which exhibit 58% amino acid identity with Rev-erb in the DBD, do not have their NLS located within the DBD. GFP/DBD. RORalpha or GFP/DBD.RORbeta remained cytoplasmic, in contrast to GFP/DBD. Rev-erb fusion proteins. Alignment of human Rev-erb and ROR DBD amino acid sequences predicted that the two basic residues, K167 and R168, located just upstream from the second zinc finger, could play a critical part in the nuclear localization of Rev-erb proteins. Substitution of these two residues with those found in ROR, in the GFP/DBD. Rev-erb context, resulted in cytoplasmic proteins. In contrast, the reverse mutation of the GFP/DBD. RORalpha towards the Rev-erbalpha residues targeted the fusion protein to the nucleus. Our data demonstrate that Rev-erb proteins contain a functional NLS in the DBD. Its location is unusual within the nuclear receptor superfamily and suggests that Rev-erb orphan receptors control their intracellular localization via a mechanism different from that of other nuclear receptors.

Methylation of RUNX1 by the Nuclear PRMT5/COPR5 Complex Regulates Its Cellular Location in Leukemia Cells,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3403-3403
Author(s):  
Xinyang Zhao ◽  
Ly P. Vu ◽  
Fabiana Perna ◽  
Fan Liu ◽  
Hao Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Arginine Methylation ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Sm Proteins ◽  
Differentiation Potential ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem

Abstract Abstract 3403 RUNX1 is a transcription factor that is required for definitive hematopoietic development, and helps regulate long term hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal, platelet production, and lymphocyte development during adult hematopoiesis. RUNX1 is known to be modified via phosphorylation, acetylation, ubiquitination and methylation, for example on R208 and R210 by PRMT1, which activates its activating function. We continue to investigate how the methylation of RUNX1 by other protein arginine methyl transferases (PRMTs) regulates its function. Loop 9 of the DNA binding domain (the Runt domain) of RUNX1 contains an SGRGK sequence that is also present on the tails of histone H2A and H4. The histone tails of H4 and H2A can be methylated by a purified PRMT5 complex in vitro. An enzymatically active in vitro PRMT5 complex capable of methylating histones and SM proteins requires two subunits: both PRMT5 and MEP50, a WD 40 repeat domain protein. Nevertheless, this purified PRMT5/MEP50 complex cannot methylate the DNA binding domain of the RUNX1 protein in vitro. We show that RUNX1 also can be symmetrically methylated at R142 within the SGRGK motif in vitro by a nuclear PRMT5/MEP50 complex which also contains COPR5. We show after RUNX1 is methylated on R142 within the nucleus of HEL cells, RUNX1 is exported to the cytoplasm in a CRM1 dependent manner, as the export of methylated RUNX1 is blocked by lemptomycin B. CRM1 interacts with PRMT5, supporting that PRMT5 mediated arginine methylation tags protein for nuclear export. Therefore, PRMT5 not only involves in epigenetic regulation by methylation of histones but also it can directly controls the level of transcription factor proteins within the nucleus. Polycytocemia Vera patients who express the Jak2V617F mutation have low PRMT5 activity due to JAK2V617F mediated PRMT5 phosphorylation (Liu et al 2011). How Jak2 signaling affects RUNX1 methylation and RUNX1 localization within the nucleus is still under investigation. By controlling the amount of RUNX1 available within the cell nucleus, PRMT5 may regulate lineage differentiation potential and growth potential of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. The nuclear localization of RUNX1 can be changed through post translational modification such as arginine methylation in addition to point mutations and translocations involving RUNX1 found patients with leukemia and pre-leukemic diseases. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 C-Terminal Variants of the Origin Binding Protein (OBP), OBPC-1 and OBPC-2, Cooperatively Regulate Viral DNA Levels In Vitro, and OBPC-2 Affects Mortality in Mice

2007 ◽  
Vol 81 (19) ◽  
pp. 10699-10711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malen A. Link ◽  
Priscilla A. Schaffer
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Viral Dna ◽  
Viral Dna Replication ◽  
Origin Binding Protein ◽  
Simplex Virus ◽  
Hsv 1

ABSTRACT Two in-frame, C-terminal isoforms of the herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) origin binding protein (OBP), OBPC-1 and OBPC-2, and a unique C-terminal transcript, UL8.5, are specified by HSV-1 DNA. As the first isoform identified, OBPC-1 was initially assumed to be the product of the UL8.5 transcript. Recent evidence has demonstrated, however, that OBPC-1 is a cathepsin B-mediated cleavage product of OBP, suggesting that OBPC-2 is the product of the UL8.5 transcript. Because both OBPC-1 and -2 contain the majority of the OBP DNA binding domain, we hypothesized that both may be involved in regulating origin-dependent, OBP-mediated viral DNA replication. In this paper, we demonstrate that OBPC-2 is, indeed, the product of the UL8.5 transcript. The translational start site of OBPC-2 was mapped, and a virus (M571A) that does not express this protein efficiently was constructed. Using M571A, we have shown that OBPC-2 is able to bind origin DNA, even though it lacks seven N-terminal amino acid residues of the previously mapped OBP DNA binding domain, resulting in a revision of the limits of the OBP DNA binding domain. Consistent with their proposed roles in regulating viral DNA replication, OBPC-1 and -2 act together to down-regulate viral DNA replication in vitro. During functional studies in vivo, OBPC-2 was identified as a factor that increases mortality in the mouse ocular model of HSV-1 infection.

scholarly journals Expression of qa-1F activator protein: identification of upstream binding sites in the qa gene cluster and localization of the DNA-binding domain.

1987 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 1256-1266 ◽  
Author(s):  
J A Baum ◽  
R Geever ◽  
N H Giles
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Gene Cluster ◽  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
Protein Identification ◽  
Regulatory Gene ◽  
Quinic Acid ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Activator Protein

The qa-1F regulatory gene of Neurospora crassa encodes an activator protein required for quinic acid induction of transcription in the qa gene cluster. This activator protein was expressed in insect cell culture with a baculovirus expression vector. The activator binds to 13 sites in the gene cluster that are characterized by a conserved 16-base-pair sequence of partial dyad symmetry. One site is located between the divergently transcribed qa-1F and qa-1S regulatory genes, corroborating prior evidence that qa-1F is autoregulated and controls expression of the qa-1S repressor. Multiple upstream sites located at variable positions 5' to the qa structural genes appear to allow for greater transcriptional control by qa-1F. Full-length and truncated activator peptides were synthesized in vitro, and the DNA-binding domain was localized to the first 183 amino acids. A 28-amino acid sequence within this region shows striking homology to N-terminal sequences from other lower-eucaryotic activator proteins. A qa-1F(Ts) mutation is located within this putative DNA-binding domain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document