scholarly journals The SANT Domain of p400 ATPase Represses Acetyltransferase Activity and Coactivator Function of TIP60 in Basal p21 Gene Expression

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 2750-2761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong Hyeon Park ◽  
Xiao-Jian Sun ◽  
Robert G. Roeder

ABSTRACT The TIP60 histone acetyltransferase plays diverse roles in DNA damage responses, DNA double-strand break repair, and transcriptional regulation. TIP60 resides within a multisubunit complex that has been shown to be targeted by transcription factors and to be involved in histone acetylation and transcriptional activation. p400, an SWI2/SNF2-related ATPase that serves as an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling enzyme, exists as an integral subunit of a TIP60 complex but also resides within a distinct complex that presumably lacks TIP60 and appears to be involved in the transcriptional repression of basal p53 target gene expression. Here, we describe a TIP60-containing p400 complex population in which the acetyltransferase activity of TIP60 is repressed by interactions with p400. We further show that an SWI3-ADA2-N-CoR-TFIIIB (SANT) domain of p400 binds directly to the histone acetyltransferase (HAT) domain of TIP60 and blocks both its enzymatic activity and its coactivator function in regulating basal p21 gene expression. Our results thus suggest that p400 represses basal p21 gene expression through dual mechanisms that include the direct inhibition of TIP60 enzymatic activity described here and the previously described ATP-dependent positioning of H2A.Z at the promoter.

Genetics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tingting Li ◽  
Ruben C Petreaca ◽  
Susan L Forsburg

Abstract Chromatin remodeling is essential for effective repair of a DNA double strand break. KAT5 (S. pombe Mst1, human TIP60) is a MYST family histone acetyltransferase conserved from yeast to humans that coordinates various DNA damage response activities at a DNA double strand break (DSB), including histone remodeling and activation of the DNA damage checkpoint. In S. pombe, mutations in mst1+ causes sensitivity to DNA damaging drugs. Here we show that Mst1 is recruited to DSBs. Mutation of mst1+ disrupts recruitment of repair proteins and delays resection. These defects are partially rescued by deletion of pku70, which has been previously shown to antagonize repair by homologous recombination. These phenotypes of mst1 are similar to pht1-4KR, a non-acetylatable form of histone variant H2A.Z, which has been proposed to affect resection. Our data suggest that Mst1 functions to direct repair of DSBs towards homologous recombination pathways by modulating resection at the double strand break.


2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (46) ◽  
pp. 29178-29189
Author(s):  
Likai Wang ◽  
Eun Esther Ko ◽  
Jaclyn Tran ◽  
Hong Qiao

Ethylene is an important plant hormone that regulates plant growth, in which the master transcriptionactivator EIN3 (Ethylene Insensitive 3)-mediated transcriptional activation plays vital roles. However, the EIN3-mediated transcriptional repression in ethylene response is unknown. We report here that a Transcriptional Repressor of EIN3-dependent Ethylene-response 1 (TREE1) interacts with EIN3 to regulate transcriptional repression that leads to an inhibition of shoot growth in response to ethylene. Tissue-specific transcriptome analysis showed that most of the genes are down-regulated by ethylene in shoots, and a DNA binding motif was identified that is important for this transcriptional repression. TREE1 binds to the DNA motif to repress gene expression in an EIN3-dependent manner. Genetic validation demonstrated that repression of TREE1-targeted genes leads to an inhibition of shoot growth. Overall, this work establishes a mechanism by which transcriptional repressor TREE1 interacts with EIN3 to inhibit shoot growth via transcriptional repression in response to ethylene.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 229-229
Author(s):  
Michael Heuser ◽  
Eric Yung ◽  
Courteney Lai ◽  
Bob Argiropoulos ◽  
Florian Kuchenbauer ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 229 Overexpression of MN1 (meningioma 1) is a negative prognostic factor in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with normal cytogenetics, and induces a rapidly lethal AML in mice. We have shown previously that MN1, a transcription cofactor of retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARA), increases resistance to all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) by greater than 3000-fold in an in-vitro differentiation model. We investigated the molecular mechanisms involved in the MN1-induced myeloid differentiation block by fusing potent transcriptional activation or repression domains to MN1, conducting a structure-function analysis of MN1, gene expression profiling, ChIP-on chip experiments, and functional validation of MN1 target genes. We found that (1) MN1 inhibits myeloid differentiation through transcriptional repression; (2) the C-terminal domain of MN1 is critical for induction of resistance to ATRA; (3) EGR2 is a putative direct target of MN1 and RARA that is repressed in MN1 leukemias; and (4) that constitutive upregulation of EGR2 in MN1 leukemias permits differentiation and prevents engraftment of transplanted cells. To investigate whether MN1 impacts on myeloid differentiation through transcriptional activation or repression we fused a strong transcriptional activation domain (VP16) or repression domain (M33) to MN1. MN1VP16 immortalized murine bone marrow cells, however, these cells could differentiate to mature granulocytes, and succumbed to cell cycle arrest upon treatment with ATRA. Mice receiving transplants of MN1VP16 cells had a median survival of 143 days (n=16) compared to 35 days in mice receiving MN1-transduced cells (n=18; p<.001). Morphologic analysis of bone marrow mostly showed mature granulocytes with less than 20 percent immature forms consistent with a diagnosis of myeloproliferative-like disease. Conversely, mice receiving transplants with cells transduced with the fusion of MN1 to the transcriptional repression domain of M33 (n=7) developed leukemia with a similar latency and phenotype as mice receiving transplants from MN1-transduced cells (survival, P=.6). These data suggest that MN1 inhibits myeloid differentiation by transcriptional repression rather than activation of its target genes. A structure-function analysis was performed to identify the domain(s) of MN1 required to inhibit myeloid differentiation. Consecutive stretches of 200 amino acids of MN1 were interrogated The deletion constructs were subsequently transduced into bone marrow cells immortalized by NUP98-HOXD13 (ND13). ND13 cells are very sensitive to ATRA-induced differentiation and cell cycle arrest with an IC50 of 0.1 μ M, whereas overexpression of MN1 increases resistance greater than 3000-fold. Interestingly, deletion of the 200 C-terminal amino acids of MN1 restored ATRA sensitivity of ND13 cells compared to full-length MN1, suggesting that the C-terminus of MN1 is required for inhibition of myeloid differentiation. To identify MN1-regulated genes important for the myeloid differentiation block we performed gene expression profiling of MN1- and MN1VP16-transduced bone marrow cells. To further identify genes that might be directly regulated by MN1 we performed ChIP-on-chip using anti-MN1 and anti-RARA antibodies. EGR2, CCL5, CMAH, among others, were identified as targets of both MN1 and RARA whose gene expression was low in MN1 but high in MN1VP16 cells. Overexpression of these genes in MN1-transduced leukemic cells was used to validate their function. Blast percentage of in vitro cultured bone marrow cells was 93, 58, 83, and 41 percent in MN1+CTL cells, MN1+EGR2, MN1+CCL5, and MN1+CMAH cells, respectively. MN1+EGR2 cell engraftment in peripheral blood of mice declined from 2.2 percent at 4 weeks to undetectable levels at 8 weeks (n=4), whereas MN1+CCL5 and MN1+CMAH cell engraftment was 23 (n=4) and 26 (n=4) percent at 4 weeks, and 14 and 30 percent at 8 weeks, respectively. At time of death, EGR2 was not detectable in mice whereas leukemias of mice receiving MN1+CCL5 or MN1+CMAH- transduced cells were positive for CCL5 or CMAH, respectively. In conclusion, our data suggest that MN1 inhibits myeloid differentiation by transcriptional repression of a subset of its target genes, and that re-expression of EGR2, a zinc-finger transcription factor, may prevent outgrowth of MN1 leukemias in mice. Pharmacologic activation of EGR2 may become a novel antileukemic strategy. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (14) ◽  
pp. 4445-4458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debabrata Biswas ◽  
Shinya Takahata ◽  
David J. Stillman

ABSTRACT Rpd3(L) and Rpd3(S) are distinct multisubunit complexes containing the Rpd3 histone deacetylase. Disruption of the GCN5 histone acetyltransferase gene shows a strong synthetic phenotype when combined with either an sds3 mutation affecting only the Rpd3(L) complex or an rco1 mutation affecting only Rpd3(S). However, these synthetic growth defects are not seen in a gcn5 sds3 rco1 triple mutant, suggesting that the balance between Rpd3(L) and Rpd3(S) is critical in cells lacking Gcn5. Different genetic interactions are seen with mutations affecting the FACT chromatin reorganizing complex. An sds3 mutation affecting only Rpd3(L) has a synthetic defect with FACT mutants, while rco1 and eaf3 mutations affecting Rpd3(S) suppress FACT mutant phenotypes. Rpd3(L) therefore acts in concert with FACT, but Rpd3(S) opposes it. Combining FACT mutations with mutations in the Esa1 subunit of the NuA4 histone acetyltransferase results in synthetic growth defects, and these can be suppressed by an rco1 or set2 mutation. An rco1 mutation suppresses phenotypes caused by mutations in the ESA1 and ARP4 subunits of NuA4, while Rco1 overexpression exacerbates these defects. These results suggest a model in which NuA4 and Rpd3(S) compete. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments show that eliminating Rpd3(S) increases the amount of NuA4 binding to the ARG3 promoter during transcriptional activation and to the sites of DNA repair induced by a double-strand break. Our results suggest that the Rpd3(L) and Rpd3(S) complexes have distinct functions in vivo and that the relative amounts of the two forms alter the effectiveness of other chromatin-altering complexes, such as FACT and NuA4.


1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 6367-6378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly-Ann Sheppard ◽  
David W. Rose ◽  
Zaffar K. Haque ◽  
Riki Kurokawa ◽  
Eileen McInerney ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) plays a role in the transcriptional regulation of genes involved in inflammation and cell survival. In this report we demonstrate that NF-κB recruits a coactivator complex that has striking similarities to that recruited by nuclear receptors. Inactivation of either cyclic AMP response element binding protein (CREB)-binding protein (CBP), members of the p160 family of coactivators, or the CBP-associated factor (p/CAF) by nuclear antibody microinjection prevents NF-κB-dependent transactivation. Like nuclear receptor-dependent gene expression, NF-κB-dependent gene expression requires specific LXXLL motifs in one of the p160 family members, and enhancement of NF-κB activity requires the histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity of p/CAF but not that of CBP. This coactivator complex is differentially recruited by members of the Rel family. The p50 homodimer fails to recruit coactivators, although the p50-p65 heterodimeric form of the transcription factor assembles the integrator complex. These findings provide new mechanistic insights into how this family of dimeric transcription factors has a differential effect on gene expression.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Merve Kuru-Schors ◽  
Monika Haemmerle ◽  
Tony Gutschner

The cohesin complex is a multi-subunit protein complex initially discovered for its role in sister chromatid cohesion. However, cohesin also has several other functions and plays important roles in transcriptional regulation, DNA double strand break repair, and chromosome architecture thereby influencing gene expression and development in organisms from yeast to man. While most of these functions rely on protein–protein interactions, post-translational protein, as well as DNA modifications, non-coding RNAs are emerging as additional players that facilitate and modulate the function or expression of cohesin and its individual components. This review provides a condensed overview about the architecture as well as the function of the cohesin complex and highlights its multifaceted interplay with both short and long non-coding RNAs.


2001 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 1269-1304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Aranda ◽  
Angel Pascual

The nuclear hormone receptor superfamily includes receptors for thyroid and steroid hormones, retinoids and vitamin D, as well as different “orphan” receptors of unknown ligand. Ligands for some of these receptors have been recently identified, showing that products of lipid metabolism such as fatty acids, prostaglandins, or cholesterol derivatives can regulate gene expression by binding to nuclear receptors. Nuclear receptors act as ligand-inducible transcription factors by directly interacting as monomers, homodimers, or heterodimers with the retinoid X receptor with DNA response elements of target genes, as well as by “cross-talking” to other signaling pathways. The effects of nuclear receptors on transcription are mediated through recruitment of coregulators. A subset of receptors binds corepressor factors and actively represses target gene expression in the absence of ligand. Corepressors are found within multicomponent complexes that contain histone deacetylase activity. Deacetylation leads to chromatin compactation and transcriptional repression. Upon ligand binding, the receptors undergo a conformational change that allows the recruitment of multiple coactivator complexes. Some of these proteins are chromatin remodeling factors or possess histone acetylase activity, whereas others may interact directly with the basic transcriptional machinery. Recruitment of coactivator complexes to the target promoter causes chromatin decompactation and transcriptional activation. The characterization of corepressor and coactivator complexes, in concert with the identification of the specific interaction motifs in the receptors, has demonstrated the existence of a general molecular mechanism by which different receptors elicit their transcriptional responses in target genes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document