scholarly journals Ribosomal DNA Transcription-Dependent Processes Interfere with Chromosome Segregation

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (16) ◽  
pp. 6239-6247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett N. Tomson ◽  
Damien D'Amours ◽  
Brittany S. Adamson ◽  
Luis Aragon ◽  
Angelika Amon
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Ribosomal Dna ◽  
Protein Phosphatase ◽  
Genomic Region ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Nucleolar Organizing Region ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Rrna Transcription ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Dependent Processes

ABSTRACT The ribosomal DNA (rDNA) is a specialized genomic region not only owing to its function as the nucleolar organizing region (NOR) but also because it is repetitive in nature and, at least in budding yeast, silenced for polymerase II (Pol II)-mediated transcription. Furthermore, cohesin-independent linkages hold the sister chromatids together at the rDNA loci, and their resolution requires the activity of the conserved protein phosphatase Cdc14. Here we show that rRNA transcription-dependent processes establish linkages at the rDNA, which affect segregation of this locus. Inactivation of Cfi1/Net1, a protein required for efficient rRNA transcription, or elimination of Pol I activity, which drives rRNA transcription, diminishes the need for CDC14 in rDNA segregation. Our results identify Pol I transcription-dependent processes as a novel means of establishing linkages between chromosomes.

scholarly journals Role of TATA Binding Protein (TBP) in Yeast Ribosomal DNA Transcription by RNA Polymerase I: Defects in the Dual Functions of Transcription Factor UAF Cannot Be Suppressed by TBP

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 2292-2297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Imran Siddiqi ◽  
John Keener ◽  
Loan Vu ◽  
Masayasu Nomura
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Ribosomal Dna ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Rna Polymerase I ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Rrna Transcription ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Mutant Strains ◽  
Polymerase I

ABSTRACT Initiation of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) transcription by RNA polymerase I (Pol I) in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae involves upstream activation factor (UAF), core factor, the TATA binding protein (TBP), and Rrn3p in addition to Pol I. We found previously that yeast strains carrying deletions in the UAF component RRN9switch completely to the use of Pol II for rRNA transcription, with no residual Pol I transcription. These polymerase-switched strains initially grow very slowly, but subsequent expansion in the number of rDNA repeats on chromosome XII leads to better growth. Recently, it was reported that TBP overexpression could bypass the requirement of UAF for Pol I transcription in vivo, producing nearly wild-type levels of growth in UAF mutant strains (P. Aprikian, B. Moorefield, and R. H. Reeder, Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:5269–5275, 2000). Here, we demonstrate that deletions in the UAF component RRN5,RRN9, or RRN10 lead to Pol II transcription of rDNA. TBP overexpression does not suppress UAF mutation, and these strains continue to use Pol II for rRNA transcription. We do not find evidence for even low levels of Pol I transcription in UAF mutant strains carrying overexpressed TBP. In diploid strains lacking both copies of the UAF componentRRN9, Pol II transcription of rDNA is more strongly repressed than in haploid strains but TBP overexpression still fails to activate Pol I. These results emphasize that UAF plays an essential role in activation of Pol I transcription and silencing of Pol II transcription of rDNA and that TBP functions to recruit the Pol I machinery in a manner completely dependent on UAF.

scholarly journals RNA Polymerase I Transcription Silences Noncoding RNAs at the Ribosomal DNA Locus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 325-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Cesarini ◽  
Francesca Romana Mariotti ◽  
Francesco Cioci ◽  
Giorgio Camilloni
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Ribosomal Dna ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Noncoding Rnas ◽  
Rdna Locus ◽  
Rna Polymerase I ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Polymerase I

ABSTRACT In Saccharomyces cerevisiae the repeated units of the ribosomal locus, transcribed by RNA polymerase I (Pol I), are interrupted by nontranscribed spacers (NTSs). These NTS regions are transcribed by RNA polymerase III to synthesize 5S RNA and by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to synthesize, at low levels, noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs). While transcription of both RNA polymerase I and III is highly characterized, at the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) locus only a few studies have been performed on Pol II, whose repression correlates with the SIR2-dependent silencing. The involvement of both chromatin organization and Pol I transcription has been proposed, and peculiar chromatin structures might justify “ribosomal” Pol II silencing. Reporter genes inserted within the rDNA units have been employed for these studies. We studied, in the natural context, yeast mutants differing in Pol I transcription in order to find whether correlations exist between Pol I transcription and Pol II ncRNA production. Here, we demonstrate that silencing at the rDNA locus represses ncRNAs with a strength inversely proportional to Pol I transcription. Moreover, localized regions of histone hyperacetylation appear in cryptic promoter elements when Pol II is active and in the coding region when Pol I is functional; in addition, DNA topoisomerase I site-specific activity follows RNA polymerase I transcription. The repression of ncRNAs at the rDNA locus, in response to RNA polymerase I transcription, could represent a physiological circuit control whose mechanism involves modification of histone acetylation.

scholarly journals Cyclin-Specific Control of Ribosomal DNA Segregation

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (17) ◽  
pp. 5328-5336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matt Sullivan ◽  
Liam Holt ◽  
David O. Morgan
Keyword(s):  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Ribosomal Dna ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Early Anaphase ◽  
Mitotic Cyclin ◽  
Mitosis And Meiosis ◽  
Specific Control

ABSTRACT Following chromosome duplication in S phase of the cell cycle, the sister chromatids are linked by cohesin. At the onset of anaphase, separase cleaves cohesin and thereby initiates sister chromatid separation. Separase activation results from the destruction of its inhibitor, securin, which is triggered by a ubiquitin ligase called the anaphase-promoting complex (APC). Here, we show in budding yeast that securin destruction and, thus, separase activation are not sufficient for the efficient segregation of the repetitive ribosomal DNA (rDNA). We find that rDNA segregation also requires the APC-mediated destruction of the S-phase cyclin Clb5, an activator of the protein kinase Cdk1. Mutations that prevent Clb5 destruction are lethal and cause defects in rDNA segregation and DNA synthesis. These defects are distinct from the mitotic-exit defects caused by stabilization of the mitotic cyclin Clb2, emphasizing the importance of cyclin specificity in the regulation of late-mitotic events. Efficient rDNA segregation, both in mitosis and meiosis, also requires APC-dependent destruction of Dbf4, an activator of the protein kinase Cdc7. We speculate that the dephosphorylation of Clb5-specific Cdk1 substrates and Dbf4-Cdc7 substrates drives the resolution of rDNA in early anaphase. The coincident destruction of securin, Clb5, and Dbf4 coordinates bulk chromosome segregation with segregation of rDNA.

scholarly journals Transcription Factor UAF, Expansion and Contraction of Ribosomal DNA (rDNA) Repeats, and RNA Polymerase Switch in Transcription of Yeast rDNA

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 8559-8569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Oakes ◽  
Imran Siddiqi ◽  
Loan Vu ◽  
John Aris ◽  
Masayasu Nomura
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Ribosomal Dna ◽  
Tandem Repeats ◽  
Single Mutation ◽  
Rdna Transcription ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Pol I

ABSTRACT Strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae defective in transcription factor UAF give rise to variants able to grow by transcribing endogenous ribosomal DNA (rDNA) by RNA polymerase II (Pol II). We have demonstrated that the switch to growth using the Pol II system consists of two steps: a mutational alteration in UAF and an expansion of chromosomal rDNA repeats. The first step, a single mutation in UAF, is sufficient to allow Pol II transcription of rDNA. In contrast to UAF mutations, mutations in Pol I or other Pol I transcription factors can not independently lead to Pol II transcription of rDNA, suggesting a specific role of UAF in preventing polymerase switch. The second step, expansion of chromosomal rDNA repeats to levels severalfold higher than the wild type, is required for efficient cell growth. Mutations in genes that affect recombination within the rDNA repeats, fob1 and sir2, decrease and increase, respectively, the frequency of switching to growth using Pol II, indicating that increased rDNA copy number is a cause rather than a consequence of the switch. Finally, we show that the switch to the Pol II system is accompanied by a striking alteration in the localization and morphology of the nucleolus. The altered state that uses Pol II for rDNA transcription is semistable and heritable through mitosis and meiosis. We discuss the significance of these observations in relation to the plasticity of rDNA tandem repeats and nucleolar structures as well as evolution of the Pol I machinery.

scholarly journals Genes Involved in Sister Chromatid Separation and Segregation in the Budding Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 159 (2) ◽  
pp. 453-470
Author(s):  
Sue Biggins ◽  
Needhi Bhalla ◽  
Amy Chang ◽  
Dana L Smith ◽  
Andrew W Murray
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Chromosome Behavior ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Marked Chromosome ◽  
Sister Chromatid Separation

Abstract Accurate chromosome segregation requires the precise coordination of events during the cell cycle. Replicated sister chromatids are held together while they are properly attached to and aligned by the mitotic spindle at metaphase. At anaphase, the links between sisters must be promptly dissolved to allow the mitotic spindle to rapidly separate them to opposite poles. To isolate genes involved in chromosome behavior during mitosis, we microscopically screened a temperature-sensitive collection of budding yeast mutants that contain a GFP-marked chromosome. Nine LOC (loss of cohesion) complementation groups that do not segregate sister chromatids at anaphase were identified. We cloned the corresponding genes and performed secondary tests to determine their function in chromosome behavior. We determined that three LOC genes, PDS1, ESP1, and YCS4, are required for sister chromatid separation and three other LOC genes, CSE4, IPL1, and SMT3, are required for chromosome segregation. We isolated alleles of two genes involved in splicing, PRP16 and PRP19, which impair α-tubulin synthesis thus preventing spindle assembly, as well as an allele of CDC7 that is defective in DNA replication. We also report an initial characterization of phenotypes associated with the SMT3/SUMO gene and the isolation of WSS1, a high-copy smt3 suppressor.

scholarly journals Pericentric chromatin loops function as a nonlinear spring in mitotic force balance

2013 ◽  
Vol 200 (6) ◽  
pp. 757-772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew D. Stephens ◽  
Rachel A. Haggerty ◽  
Paula A. Vasquez ◽  
Leandra Vicci ◽  
Chloe E. Snider ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Force Balance ◽  
Nonlinear Spring ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Spindle Dynamics ◽  
Restoring Forces ◽  
Cross Links ◽  
Mean And Variance

The mechanisms by which sister chromatids maintain biorientation on the metaphase spindle are critical to the fidelity of chromosome segregation. Active force interplay exists between predominantly extensional microtubule-based spindle forces and restoring forces from chromatin. These forces regulate tension at the kinetochore that silences the spindle assembly checkpoint to ensure faithful chromosome segregation. Depletion of pericentric cohesin or condensin has been shown to increase the mean and variance of spindle length, which have been attributed to a softening of the linear chromatin spring. Models of the spindle apparatus with linear chromatin springs that match spindle dynamics fail to predict the behavior of pericentromeric chromatin in wild-type and mutant spindles. We demonstrate that a nonlinear spring with a threshold extension to switch between spring states predicts asymmetric chromatin stretching observed in vivo. The addition of cross-links between adjacent springs recapitulates coordination between pericentromeres of neighboring chromosomes.

scholarly journals The Splicing ATPase Prp43p Is a Component of Multiple Preribosomal Particles

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (21) ◽  
pp. 9269-9282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Lebaron ◽  
Carine Froment ◽  
Micheline Fromont-Racine ◽  
Jean-Christophe Rain ◽  
Bernard Monsarrat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Affinity Purification ◽  
Rna Polymerase I ◽  
Rrna Processing ◽  
Rrna Transcription ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Final Maturation ◽  
Steady State Levels ◽  
Splicing Defects ◽  
Polymerase I ◽  
Two Hybrid

ABSTRACT Prp43p is a putative helicase of the DEAH family which is required for the release of the lariat intron from the spliceosome. Prp43p could also play a role in ribosome synthesis, since it accumulates in the nucleolus. Consistent with this hypothesis, we find that depletion of Prp43p leads to accumulation of 35S pre-rRNA and strongly reduces levels of all downstream pre-rRNA processing intermediates. As a result, the steady-state levels of mature rRNAs are greatly diminished following Prp43p depletion. We present data arguing that such effects are unlikely to be solely due to splicing defects. Moreover, we demonstrate by a combination of a comprehensive two-hybrid screen, tandem-affinity purification followed by mass spectrometry, and Northern analyses that Prp43p is associated with 90S, pre-60S, and pre-40S ribosomal particles. Prp43p seems preferentially associated with Pfa1p, a novel specific component of pre-40S ribosomal particles. In addition, Prp43p interacts with components of the RNA polymerase I (Pol I) transcription machinery and with mature 18S and 25S rRNAs. Hence, Prp43p might be delivered to nascent 90S ribosomal particles during pre-rRNA transcription and remain associated with preribosomal particles until their final maturation steps in the cytoplasm. Our data also suggest that the ATPase activity of Prp43p is required for early steps of pre-rRNA processing and normal accumulation of mature rRNAs.

Purification and characterization of a novel factor which stimulates rat ribosomal gene transcription in vitro by interacting with enhancer and core promoter elements

1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 5177-5186
Author(s):  
J Zhang ◽  
S T Jacob
Keyword(s):  
Ribosomal Dna ◽  
Core Promoter ◽  
Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Sodium Dodecyl ◽  
Affinity Column ◽  
Mobility Shift ◽  
Enhancer Element ◽  
Molecular Weights ◽  
The Core ◽  
Pol I

Previous studies in our laboratory have characterized a 174-base-pair (bp) enhancer sequence in the rat ribosomal DNA spacer region that exhibits all of the characteristics of a polymerase (Pol) II enhancer. Further studies showed that at least half of the enhancer activity resides in a 37-bp motif (E1) within the 174-bp spacer sequence that is located between positions -2.183 and -2.219 kilobase pairs upstream of the initiation site. To identify the factor(s) that binds specifically to the 37-bp enhancer domain, we fractionated whole-cell extract from rat adenocarcinoma ascites cells by chromatography on a series of columns, including an oligodeoxynucleotide affinity column. The final preparation contained two polypeptides of molecular weights 79,400 and 89,100 and was completely devoid of RNA Pol I activity. Electrophoretic mobility shift analysis showed that the polypeptides in the purified preparation (designated E1BF) interacted with both the enhancer element and the core promoter. To determine whether each polypeptide can separately bind to the core promoter and the enhancer, the individual components were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, renatured, and subjected to gel retardation analysis. This experiment demonstrated that both polypeptides interacted with the two cis-acting sequences. The specificity of the binding was demonstrated by competition with unlabeled 37-bp and core promoter fragments and lack of competition with nonspecific DNAs in the mobility shift assay. The 37-bp enhancer as well as the downstream sequence of the core promoter were protected by E1BF in the DNase I footprinting assay. Addition of E1BF to limiting amounts of fraction DE-B, which contains all factors essential for Pol I-directed transcription, resulted in three- to fourfold stimulation of ribosomal DNA transcription. Comparison of molecular weights and footprinting profiles did not reveal any relationship between E1BF and other Pol I trans-acting factors.

scholarly journals Differential requirement for Bub1 and Bub3 in regulation of meiotic versus mitotic chromosome segregation

2020 ◽  
Vol 219 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gisela Cairo ◽  
Anne M. MacKenzie ◽  
Soni Lacefield
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Protein Phosphatase ◽  
Mitotic Chromosome ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Meiotic Chromosome ◽  
Protein Phosphatase 1 ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Chromosome Missegregation ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Spindle Microtubules

Accurate chromosome segregation depends on the proper attachment of kinetochores to spindle microtubules before anaphase onset. The Ipl1/Aurora B kinase corrects improper attachments by phosphorylating kinetochore components and so releasing aberrant kinetochore–microtubule interactions. The localization of Ipl1 to kinetochores in budding yeast depends upon multiple pathways, including the Bub1–Bub3 pathway. We show here that in meiosis, Bub3 is crucial for correction of attachment errors. Depletion of Bub3 results in reduced levels of kinetochore-localized Ipl1 and concomitant massive chromosome missegregation caused by incorrect chromosome–spindle attachments. Depletion of Bub3 also results in shorter metaphase I and metaphase II due to premature localization of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) to kinetochores, which antagonizes Ipl1-mediated phosphorylation. We propose a new role for the Bub1–Bub3 pathway in maintaining the balance between kinetochore localization of Ipl1 and PP1, a balance that is essential for accurate meiotic chromosome segregation and timely anaphase onset.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document