scholarly journals Cdc13 N-Terminal Dimerization, DNA Binding, and Telomere Length Regulation

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (22) ◽  
pp. 5325-5334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meghan T. Mitchell ◽  
Jasmine S. Smith ◽  
Mark Mason ◽  
Sandy Harper ◽  
David W. Speicher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Telomere Length ◽  
Functional Characterization ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Telomeric Dna ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Length Regulation ◽  
Telomere Length Regulation

ABSTRACT The essential yeast protein Cdc13 facilitates chromosome end replication by recruiting telomerase to telomeres, and together with its interacting partners Stn1 and Ten1, it protects chromosome ends from nucleolytic attack, thus contributing to genome integrity. Although Cdc13 has been studied extensively, the precise role of its N-terminal domain (Cdc13N) in telomere length regulation remains unclear. Here we present a structural, biochemical, and functional characterization of Cdc13N. The structure reveals that this domain comprises an oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide binding (OB) fold and is involved in Cdc13 dimerization. Biochemical data show that Cdc13N weakly binds long, single-stranded, telomeric DNA in a fashion that is directly dependent on domain oligomerization. When introduced into full-length Cdc13 in vivo, point mutations that prevented Cdc13N dimerization or DNA binding caused telomere shortening or lengthening, respectively. The multiple DNA binding domains and dimeric nature of Cdc13 offer unique insights into how it coordinates the recruitment and regulation of telomerase access to the telomeres.

scholarly journals Ten1p promotes the telomeric DNA-binding activity of Cdc13p: implication for its function in telomere length regulation

Cell Research ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 849-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Qian ◽  
Jianyong Wang ◽  
Na-Na Jin ◽  
Xiao-Hong Fu ◽  
Yi-Chien Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Telomere Length ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Telomeric Dna ◽  
Dna Binding Activity ◽  
Length Regulation ◽  
Telomere Length Regulation

scholarly journals Rif1 regulates telomere length through conserved HEAT repeats

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 3967-3980
Author(s):  
Calla B Shubin ◽  
Rini Mayangsari ◽  
Ariel D Swett ◽  
Carol W Greider
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Telomere Length ◽  
Functional Role ◽  
Conserved Residues ◽  
Binding Interface ◽  
Binding Function ◽  
Length Regulation ◽  
Telomere Length Regulation ◽  
Telomere Regulation ◽  
Conserved Amino Acids

AbstractIn budding yeast, Rif1 negatively regulates telomere length, but the mechanism of this regulation has remained elusive. Previous work identified several functional domains of Rif1, but none of these has been shown to mediate telomere length. To define Rif1 domains responsible for telomere regulation, we localized truncations of Rif1 to a single specific telomere and measured telomere length of that telomere compared to bulk telomeres. We found that a domain in the N-terminus containing HEAT repeats, Rif1177–996, was sufficient for length regulation when tethered to the telomere. Charged residues in this region were previously proposed to mediate DNA binding. We found that mutation of these residues disrupted telomere length regulation even when Rif1 was tethered to the telomere. Mutation of other conserved residues in this region, which were not predicted to interact with DNA, also disrupted telomere length maintenance, while mutation of conserved residues distal to this region did not. Our data suggest that conserved amino acids in the region from 436 to 577 play a functional role in telomere length regulation, which is separate from their proposed DNA binding function. We propose that the Rif1 HEAT repeats region represents a protein-protein binding interface that mediates telomere length regulation.

scholarly journals Role of Papillomavirus E1 Initiator Dimerization in DNA Replication

2005 ◽  
Vol 79 (13) ◽  
pp. 8661-8664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Schuck ◽  
Arne Stenlund
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Severe Effect ◽  
Origin Of Dna Replication ◽  
Initiation Of Dna Replication

ABSTRACT Viral initiator proteins are polypeptides that form oligomeric complexes on the origin of DNA replication (ori). These complexes carry out a multitude of functions related to initiation of DNA replication, and although many of these functions have been characterized biochemically, little is understood about how the complexes are assembled. Here we demonstrate that loss of one particular interaction, the dimerization between E1 DNA binding domains, has a severe effect on DNA replication in vivo but has surprisingly modest effects on most individual biochemical activities in vitro. We conclude that the dimer interaction is primarily required for initial recognition of ori.

N-terminal DNA-binding domains contribute to differential DNA-binding specificities of NF-kappa B p50 and p65

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 852-860
Author(s):  
M B Toledano ◽  
D Ghosh ◽  
F Trinh ◽  
W J Leonard
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Terminal Region ◽  
Sequence Motif ◽  
Structural Determinants ◽  
Nf Kappa B ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Dna Binding Specificity

We previously reported that either oxidation or alkylation of NF-kappa B in vitro abrogates DNA binding. We used this phenomenon to help elucidate structural determinants of NF-kappa B binding. We now demonstrate that Cys-62 of NF-kappa B p50 mediates the redox effect and lies within an N-terminal region required for DNA binding but not for dimerization. Several point mutations in this region confer a transdominant negative binding phenotype to p50. The region is highly conserved in all Rel family proteins, and we have determined that it is also critical for DNA binding of NF-kappa B p65. Replacement of the N-terminal region of p65 with the corresponding region from p50 changes its DNA-binding specificity towards that of p50. These data suggest that the N-terminal regions of p50 and p65 are critical for DNA binding and help determine the DNA-binding specificities of p50 and p65. We have defined within the N-terminal region a sequence motif, R(F/G)(R/K)YXCE, which is present in Rel family proteins and also in zinc finger proteins capable of binding to kappa B sites. The potential significance of this finding is discussed.

In vivo requirement for the paired domain and homeodomain of the paired segmentation gene product

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (9) ◽  
pp. 2673-2685 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Bertuccioli ◽  
L. Fasano ◽  
S. Jun ◽  
S. Wang ◽  
G. Sheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Mode ◽  
Cooperative Interaction ◽  
Paired Domain ◽  
Conserved Motifs ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Functionally Impaired

The Drosophila pair-rule gene paired is required for the correct expression of the segment polarity genes wingless, engrailed and gooseberry. It encodes a protein containing three conserved motifs: a homeodomain (HD), a paired domain (PD) and a PRD (His/Pro) repeat. We use a rescue assay in which paired (or a mutated version of paired in which the functions of the conserved motifs have been altered) is expressed under the control of its own promoter, in the absence of endogenous paired, to dissect the Paired protein in vivo. We show that both the HD and the N- terminal subdomain of the PD (PAI domain) are absolutely required within the same molecule for normal paired function. In contrast, the conserved C-terminal subdomain of the PD (RED domain) appears to be dispensable. Furthermore, although a mutation abolishing the ability of the homeodomain to dimerize results in an impaired Paired molecule, this molecule is nonetheless able to mediate a high degree of rescue. Finally, a paired transgene lacking the PRD repeat is functionally impaired, but still able to rescue to viability. We conclude that, while Prd can use its DNA-binding domains combinatorially in order to achieve different DNA-binding specificities, its principal binding mode requires a cooperative interaction between the PAI domain and the homeodomain.

scholarly journals Characterization of quail Pax-6 (Pax-QNR) proteins expressed in the neuroretina.

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 7257-7266 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Carriere ◽  
S Plaza ◽  
P Martin ◽  
B Quatannens ◽  
M Bailly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Autosomal Dominant ◽  
Paired Domain ◽  
Terminal Part ◽  
Dominant Mutation ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Carboxyl Terminal

After differential screening of a cDNA library constructed from quail neuroretina cells (QNR) infected with the v-myc-containing avian retrovirus MC29, we have isolated a cDNA clone, Pax-QNR, homologous to the murine Pax-6, which is mutated in the autosomal dominant mutation small eye of mice and in the disorder aniridia in humans. Here we report the characterization of the Pax-QNR proteins expressed in the avian neuroretina. From bacterially expressed Pax-QNR peptides, we obtained rabbit antisera directed against different domains of the protein: paired domain (serum 11), domain between the paired domain and homeodomain (serum 12), homeodomain (serum 13), and carboxyl-terminal part (serum 14). Sera 12, 13, and 14 were able to specifically recognize five proteins (48, 46, 43, 33, and 32 kDa) in the neuroretina. In contrast to proteins of 48, 46, and 43 kDa, proteins of 33 and 32 kDa were not recognized by the paired antiserum (serum 11). Paired-less and paired-containing proteins exhibited the same half-life (6 h) and were phosphorylated mostly on serine residues. Immunoprecipitations performed with subcellular fractions of neuroretinas showed that the paired-containing proteins were located in the nucleus, whereas the 33- and 32-kDa proteins were found essentially in the cytoplasmic compartment. However, immunofluorescence experiments performed after transient transfections showed that p46 and p33/32 were also located in vivo into the nucleus. Thus, the Pax-QNR/Pax-6 gene can produce proteins with two DNA-binding domains as well as proteins containing only the DNA-binding homeodomain.

scholarly journals SATB1 Cleavage by Caspase 6 Disrupts PDZ Domain-Mediated Dimerization, Causing Detachment from Chromatin Early in T-Cell Apoptosis

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (16) ◽  
pp. 5591-5604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjeev Galande ◽  
Liliane A. Dickinson ◽  
I. Saira Mian ◽  
Marianna Sikorska ◽  
Terumi Kohwi-Shigematsu
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Cell Apoptosis ◽  
Pdz Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
T Cell Apoptosis ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Caspase 6 ◽  
Loop Domains

ABSTRACT SATB1 is expressed primarily in thymocytes and orchestrates temporal and spatial expression of a large number of genes in the T-cell lineage. SATB1 binds to the bases of chromatin loop domains in vivo, recognizing a special DNA context with strong base-unpairing propensity. The majority of thymocytes are eliminated by apoptosis due to selection processes in the thymus. We investigated the fate of SATB1 during thymocyte and T-cell apoptosis. Here we show that SATB1 is specifically cleaved by a caspase 6-like protease at amino acid position 254 to produce a 65-kDa major fragment containing both a base-unpairing region (BUR)-binding domain and a homeodomain. We found that this cleavage separates the DNA-binding domains from amino acids 90 to 204, a region which we show to be a dimerization domain. The resulting SATB1 monomer loses its BUR-binding activity, despite containing both its DNA-binding domains, and rapidly dissociates from chromatin in vivo. We found this dimerization region to have sequence similarity to PDZ domains, which have been previously shown to be involved in signaling by conferring protein-protein interactions. SATB1 cleavage during Jurkat T-cell apoptosis induced by an anti-Fas antibody occurs concomitantly with the high-molecular-weight fragmentation of chromatin of ∼50-kb fragments. Our results suggest that mechanisms of nuclear degradation early in apoptotic T cells involve efficient removal of SATB1 by disrupting its dimerization and cleavage of genomic DNA into loop domains to ensure rapid and efficient disassembly of higher-order chromatin structure.

scholarly journals Fused protein domains inhibit DNA binding by LexA.

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 3006-3014 ◽  
Author(s):  
E A Golemis ◽  
R Brent
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
In Vitro Assays ◽  
Dimerization Domain ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Operator Binding

Many studies of transcription activation employ fusions of activation domains to DNA binding domains derived from the bacterial repressor LexA and the yeast activator GAL4. Such studies often implicitly assume that DNA binding by the chimeric proteins is equivalent to that of the protein donating the DNA binding moiety. To directly investigate this issue, we compared operator binding by a series of LexA-derivative proteins to operator binding by native LexA, by using both in vivo and in vitro assays. We show that operator binding by many proteins such as LexA-Myc, LexA-Fos, and LexA-Bicoid is severely impaired, while binding of other LexA-derivative proteins, such as those that carry bacterially encoded acidic sequences ("acid blobs"), is not. Our results also show that DNA binding by LexA derivatives that contain the LexA carboxy-terminal dimerization domain (amino acids 88 to 202) is considerably stronger than binding by fusions that lack it and that heterologous dimerization motifs cannot substitute for the LexA88-202 function. These results suggest the need to reevaluate some previous studies of activation that employed LexA derivatives and modifications to recent experimental approaches that use LexA and GAL4 derivatives to detect and study protein-protein interactions.

DNA Binding and Telomere Length Regulation of Yeast RAP1 Homologues

2003 ◽  
Vol 332 (4) ◽  
pp. 821-833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johan Wahlin ◽  
Monika Rosén ◽  
Marita Cohn
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Telomere Length ◽  
Length Regulation ◽  
Telomere Length Regulation

Characterization of quail Pax-6 (Pax-QNR) proteins expressed in the neuroretina

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 7257-7266
Author(s):  
C Carriere ◽  
S Plaza ◽  
P Martin ◽  
B Quatannens ◽  
M Bailly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Autosomal Dominant ◽  
Paired Domain ◽  
Terminal Part ◽  
Dominant Mutation ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Carboxyl Terminal

After differential screening of a cDNA library constructed from quail neuroretina cells (QNR) infected with the v-myc-containing avian retrovirus MC29, we have isolated a cDNA clone, Pax-QNR, homologous to the murine Pax-6, which is mutated in the autosomal dominant mutation small eye of mice and in the disorder aniridia in humans. Here we report the characterization of the Pax-QNR proteins expressed in the avian neuroretina. From bacterially expressed Pax-QNR peptides, we obtained rabbit antisera directed against different domains of the protein: paired domain (serum 11), domain between the paired domain and homeodomain (serum 12), homeodomain (serum 13), and carboxyl-terminal part (serum 14). Sera 12, 13, and 14 were able to specifically recognize five proteins (48, 46, 43, 33, and 32 kDa) in the neuroretina. In contrast to proteins of 48, 46, and 43 kDa, proteins of 33 and 32 kDa were not recognized by the paired antiserum (serum 11). Paired-less and paired-containing proteins exhibited the same half-life (6 h) and were phosphorylated mostly on serine residues. Immunoprecipitations performed with subcellular fractions of neuroretinas showed that the paired-containing proteins were located in the nucleus, whereas the 33- and 32-kDa proteins were found essentially in the cytoplasmic compartment. However, immunofluorescence experiments performed after transient transfections showed that p46 and p33/32 were also located in vivo into the nucleus. Thus, the Pax-QNR/Pax-6 gene can produce proteins with two DNA-binding domains as well as proteins containing only the DNA-binding homeodomain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document