scholarly journals Comparison of Real-Time PCR, Reverse Transcriptase Real-Time PCR, Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification, and the FDA Conventional Microbiological Method for the Detection of Salmonella spp. in Produce

2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 6495-6501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guodong Zhang ◽  
Eric W. Brown ◽  
Narjol González-Escalona
Keyword(s):  
Reverse Transcriptase ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Internal Control ◽  
Real Time Pcr ◽  
Culture Method ◽  
Isothermal Amplification ◽  
Molecular Methods ◽  
Salmonella Spp ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification

ABSTRACTContamination of foods, especially produce, withSalmonellaspp. is a major concern for public health. Several methods are available for the detection ofSalmonellain produce, but their relative efficiency for detectingSalmonellain commonly consumed vegetables, often associated with outbreaks of food poisoning, needs to be confirmed. In this study, the effectiveness of three molecular methods for detection ofSalmonellain six produce matrices was evaluated and compared to the FDA microbiological detection method. Samples of cilantro (coriander leaves), lettuce, parsley, spinach, tomato, and jalapeno pepper were inoculated withSalmonellaserovars at two different levels (105and <101CFU/25 g of produce). The inoculated produce was assayed by the FDASalmonellaculture method (Bacteriological Analytical Manual) and by three molecular methods: quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), quantitative reverse transcriptase real-time PCR (RT-qPCR), and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). Comparable results were obtained by these four methods, which all detected as little as 2 CFU ofSalmonellacells/25 g of produce. All control samples (not inoculated) were negative by the four methods. RT-qPCR detects only liveSalmonellacells, obviating the danger of false-positive results from nonviable cells. False negatives (inhibition of either qPCR or RT-qPCR) were avoided by the use of either a DNA or an RNA amplification internal control (IAC). Compared to the conventional culture method, the qPCR, RT-qPCR, and LAMP assays allowed faster and equally accurate detection ofSalmonellaspp. in six high-risk produce commodities.

scholarly journals Comparison of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification and Real-Time PCR Assays for Detection ofStrongyloidesLarvae in Different Specimen Matrices

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Watts ◽  
Rady Kim ◽  
Vishal Ahuja ◽  
Gemma J. Robertson ◽  
Yasmin Sultana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Real Time Pcr ◽  
Chronic Infection ◽  
Lamp Assay ◽  
Isothermal Amplification ◽  
Diagnostic Methods ◽  
Percentage Agreement ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification ◽  
Stool Specimens

ABSTRACTStrongyloides stercoraliscan cause disease that ranges from asymptomatic chronic infection to fatal hyperinfection. Diagnosis from stool can be challenging because the most sensitive conventional tests require live larvae to be effective and there can be low larval output in chronic infection. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) have been developed to complement existing diagnostic methods. We compared a recently developed loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay with a real-time PCR that has previously been validated with larval microscopy. The limits of detection—quantified using serial dilutions of DNA extracts from singleStrongyloides rattithird-stage (L3) larvae spiked into approximately 250 µl of 5 differentS. stercoralis-negative stool specimens—were 10−3(1/5 replicates) and 10−2(1/5 replicates) dilutions for PCR and LAMP, respectively. PCR was positive for 4/5 replicates at 10−2. LAMP was compared to PCR using extracts from 396 stool specimens collected in Bangladesh and Australia, of which 53 were positive and 343 were negative by PCR. The positive percentage agreement of LAMP was 77.3% (95% score confidence interval [CI], 64.5 to 86.6). The negative percentage agreement was 100% (95% CI, 98.9 to 100). In a preliminary investigation, PCR and LAMP assays were positive using DNA extracted from serum (PCR, 3/16 extracts; LAMP, 2/16 extracts) and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (PCR and LAMP, 2/2 extracts), demonstrating proof of concept. Compared to PCR, the lower number of positive results using the LAMP assay may have been due to reaction inhibitors and DNA degradation, and strategies to improve the LAMP assay are discussed.

scholarly journals Evaluation of StrepBSelectChromogenic Medium and the Fast-Track Diagnostics Group B Streptococcus (GBS) Real-Time PCR Assay Compared to Routine Culture for Detection of GBS during Antepartum Screening

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (7) ◽  
pp. 2137-2142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deirdre L. Church ◽  
Heather Baxter ◽  
Tracie Lloyd ◽  
Oscar Larios ◽  
Daniel B. Gregson
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Real Time Pcr ◽  
Fast Track ◽  
Group B Streptococcus ◽  
Culture Method ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Standard Culture ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Cost

ABSTRACTLife-threatening infection in neonates due to group BStreptococcus(GBS) is preventable by screening of near-term pregnant women and treatment at delivery. A total of 295 vaginal-rectal swabs were collected from women attending antepartum clinics in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. GBS colonization was detected by the standard culture method (Strep B Carrot Broth subcultured to blood agar with a neomycin disk) and compared to recovery with Strep Group B Broth (Dalynn Biologicals) subcultured to StrepBSelectchromogenic medium (CM; Bio-Rad Laboratories) and the Fast-Track Diagnostics GBS real-time PCR (quantitative PCR [qPCR]) assay (Phoenix Airmid Biomedical Corp.) performed with broth-enriched samples and the Abbottm2000sp/m2000rt system. A total of 62/295 (21%) women were colonized with GBS; 58 (19.7%) cases were detected by standard culture, while CM and qPCR each found 61 (20.7%) cases. The qPCR and CM were similar in performance, with sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values of 98.4 and 98.4%, 99.6 and 99.6%, 98.4 and 98.4%, and 99.6 and 99.6%, respectively, compared to routine culture. Both qPCR and CM would allow more rapid reporting of routine GBS screening results than standard culture. Although the cost per test was similar for standard culture and CM, the routine use of qPCR would cost approximately four times as much as culture-based detection. Laboratories worldwide should consider implementing one of the newer methods for primary GBS testing, depending on the cost limitations of different health care jurisdictions.

scholarly journals Rapid identification of transgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants by loop-mediated isothermal amplification

2011 ◽  
Vol 47 (No. 4) ◽  
pp. 140-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Rostamkhani ◽  
A. Haghnazari ◽  
M. Tohidfar ◽  
A. Moradi
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Real Time Pcr ◽  
Lamp Assay ◽  
Transgenic Cotton ◽  
Rapid Identification ◽  
Isothermal Amplification ◽  
Detection Sensitivity ◽  
Lamp Method ◽  
Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification ◽  
Leaf Tissues

In an attempt to speed up the process of screening of transgenic cotton (G. hirsutum L.) plants, a visual and rapid loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay was adopted. Genomic DNA was extracted from fresh leaf tissues of T<sub>2</sub> transgenic cotton containing chitinase (chi) and cry1A(b) genes. Detection of genes of interest was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), LAMP and real-time PCR methods. In LAMP assay the amplification was performed after 30 min at 65&deg;C when loop primers were involved in the reaction. The involvement of loop primers decreased the time needed for amplification. By testing serial tenfold dilutions (10<sup>&ndash;1</sup> to 10<sup>&ndash;8</sup>) of the genes of interest, the detection sensitivity of LAMP was found to be 100-fold higher than that of PCR. The rapid DNA extraction method and LAMP assay can be performed within 30 min and the derived LAMP products can be directly observed as visually detectable based on turbidity in the reaction tube. The accuracy of LAMP method in the screening of transgenes was confirmed by PCR and real-time PCR. The developed method was efficient, rapid and sensitive in the screening of cotton transgenic plants. This method can be applied to any other crops.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document