scholarly journals Quantitative Analysis of Gentamicin Exposure in Neonates and Infants Calls into Question Its Current Dosing Recommendations

2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamara van Donge ◽  
Marc Pfister ◽  
Julia Bielicki ◽  
Chantal Csajka ◽  
Frederique Rodieux ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTOptimal dosing of gentamicin in neonates is still a matter of debate despite its common use. We identified gentamicin dosing regimens from eight international guidelines and seven Swiss neonatal intensive care units. The dose per administration, the dosing interval, the total daily dose, and the demographic characteristics between guidelines were compared. There was considerable variability with respect to dose (4 to 6 mg/kg), dosing interval (24 h to 48 h), total daily dose (2.5 to 6 mg/kg/day), and patient demographic characteristics that were used to calculate individualized dosing regimens. A model-based simulation study in 1071 neonates was performed to determine the achievement of efficacious peak gentamicin concentrations according to predefined MICs (Cmax/MIC ≥ 10) and safe trough concentrations (Cmin≤ 2 mg/liter) with recommended dosing regimens. MIC targets of 0.5 and 1 mg/liter were used. Dosing optimization was performed giving priority to the first day of treatment and with the goal of simplifying dosing. Current gentamicin neonatal guidelines allow to achieve effective peak concentrations for MICs ≤ 0.5 mg/liter but not higher. Model-based simulations indicate that to attain peak gentamicin concentrations of ≥10 mg/liter, a dose of 7.5 mg/kg should be administered using an extended dosing interval regimen. Trough concentrations of ≤2 mg/liter can be maintained with a dosing interval of 36 to 48 h in neonates according to gestational and postnatal age. For treatment beyond 3 days, therapeutic drug monitoring is advised to maintain adequate serum concentrations.

2019 ◽  
Vol 104 (6) ◽  
pp. e27.2-e28
Author(s):  
MA de Hoop-Sommen ◽  
TM van der Zanden ◽  
K Allegaert ◽  
RB Flint ◽  
SHP Simons ◽  
...  

BackgroundMany drugs are used off-label in term and preterm neonates, and dosing recommendations for many drugs are lacking in the Dutch Paediatric Formulary (DPF). This results in widely varying dosing regimens used across neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in the Netherlands. The Neodose pilot project aimed to develop best-evidence national dosing recommendations for (pre)term neonates. Because scientific evidence is scarce, a consensus-based approach was used.MethodsA priority drug list, containing the most frequently used drugs for neonates, was drafted. From this list 22 drugs were selected for further research within the Neodose pilot project. The pilot utilized a two-step approach: First, consensus was established with all Dutch NICUs for neonatal dosing recommendations. Local treatment protocols were retrieved, compared and discussed, leading to consensus-based dosing recommendations. Secondly, we aimed to develop best-evidence dosing recommendations for the following five drugs: acyclovir, ganciclovir, ibuprofen, hydrocortisone and dexamethasone.ResultsFor 21 of 22 drugs, local dosing guidelines differed significantly. Mostly concerning total daily dose, dosing frequency and route of administration. Little or no distinction is made between treatment of preterm and term neonates. Approximately half of the consensus-based dosing recommendations (45%) differ in some degree from all local protocols. Comparing the consensus-based dosing recommendations with the available evidence, almost half of the consensus doses were adjusted. The grounds on which dosing recommendations were adjusted differed. Acyclovir-dosing adjustment was based on pharmacokinetics. Hydrocortisone-dosing was adjusted due to new insights after the evidence has been put together. For dexamethasone-dosing, the consensus dose was eventually chosen, because every available trial used a different dosing regimen.ConclusionThis pilot showed that, when evidence is inconclusive, consensus on dosing regimens in neonates can be obtained by comparing local regimens and analysing the available evidence. For more uniform use, these new recommendations will be published in the DPF.Disclosure(s)This project was funded by the federation of medical specialists for qualitative improvement (Stichting Kwaliteitsgelden Medisch Specialisten (SKMS).


2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinziana Cristea ◽  
Anne Smits ◽  
Aida Kulo ◽  
Catherijne A. J. Knibbe ◽  
Mirjam van Weissenbruch ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Aminoglycoside pharmacokinetics (PK) is expected to change in neonates with perinatal asphyxia treated with therapeutic hypothermia (PATH). Several amikacin dosing guidelines have been proposed for treating neonates with (suspected) septicemia; however, none provide adjustments for cases of PATH. Therefore, we aimed to quantify the differences in amikacin PK between neonates with and without PATH to propose suitable dosing recommendations. Based on amikacin therapeutic drug monitoring data collected retrospectively from neonates with PATH, combined with a published data set, we assessed the impact of PATH on amikacin PK by using population modeling. Monte Carlo and stochastic simulations were performed to establish amikacin exposures in neonates with PATH after dosing according to the current guidelines and according to proposed model-derived dosing guidelines. Amikacin clearance was decreased 40.6% in neonates with PATH, with no changes in volume of distribution. Simulations showed that increasing the dosing interval by 12 h results in a decrease in the percentage of neonates reaching toxic trough levels (>5 mg/liter), from 40 to 76% to 14 to 25%, while still reaching efficacy targets compared to the results of current dosing regimens. Based on this study, a 12-h increase in the amikacin dosing interval in neonates with PATH is proposed to correct for the reduced clearance, yielding safe and effective exposures. As amikacin is renally excreted, further studies into other renally excreted drugs may be required, as their clearance may also be impaired.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 476-484
Author(s):  
Jennifer T. Pham

Late-onset sepsis in neonates can lead to significant morbidity and mortality, especially in preterm infants. Vancomycin is commonly prescribed for the treatment of Gram-positive organisms, particularly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), coagulase-negative staphylococci, and ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus species in adult and pediatric patients. Currently, there is no consensus on optimal dosing and monitoring of vancomycin in neonates. Different vancomycin dosing regimens exist for neonates, but with many of these regimens, obtaining therapeutic trough concentrations can be difficult. In 2011, the Infectious Diseases Society of America recommended vancomycin trough concentrations of 15 to 20 mg/L or an AUC/MIC ratio of ≥400 for severe invasive diseases (e.g., MRSA) in adult and pediatric patients. Owing to recent reports of increased risk of nephrotoxicity associated with vancomycin trough concentrations of 15 to 20 mg/L and AUC/MIC of ≥400, a revised consensus guideline, recently published in 2020, no longer recommends monitoring vancomycin trough concentrations in adult patients. The guideline recommends an AUC/MIC of 400 to 600, which has been found to achieve clinical efficacy while reducing nephrotoxicity. However, these recommendations were derived solely from adult literature, as there are limited clinical outcomes data in pediatric and neonatal patients. Furthermore, owing to the variation of vancomycin pharmacokinetic parameters among the neonatal population, these recommendations for achieving vancomycin AUC/MIC of 400 to 600 in neonates require further investigation. This review will discuss the challenges of achieving optimal vancomycin dosing and monitoring in neonatal patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 358-363
Author(s):  
Kevin P. Lonabaugh ◽  
Kelly J. Lunsford ◽  
Gary Y. Fang ◽  
David A. Kaufman ◽  
Samuel D. Addison ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVES The objective of the current study was to evaluate the doses of vancomycin used to obtain therapeutic drug concentrations in pediatric patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), using new ECMO technologies. METHODS This was a single-center, retrospective study of patients treated with vancomycin while receiving ECMO using low-volume circuit technology. RESULTS A total of 28 patients were included in the analysis of the primary endpoint. Patients had a median age of 6 weeks (0–11 years) and a median weight of 3.45 kg (2.44–37.2 kg). Ultrafiltration was used in 89.3% of patients at initiation of ECMO regardless of baseline renal function, resulting in a median urine output of 2 mL/kg/hr at the time of the final vancomycin dose. Most patients started vancomycin at the same time as ECMO. The median total daily dose was 30 mg/kg/day. The median total daily dose in a subset of patients less than one year of age was 20 mg/kg/day. Nearly all patients had at least 1 therapeutic trough serum vancomycin concentration. A total of 16 patients completed their vancomycin course using an interval of every 12 hours or shorter. Half-life was calculated in a subset of 11 patients and the mean was found to be 12.3 ± 2.8 hours. CONCLUSIONS An initial dosing interval of every 12 hours to provide a total daily dose of 30 mg/kg/day is a possible option in pediatric patients on ECMO provided that renal function is normal at baseline. Monitoring of serum vancomycin concentrations for adjustment of dosing is required throughout therapy and is still warranted.


Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1130
Author(s):  
Yichang Zhao ◽  
Jingjing Hou ◽  
Yiwen Xiao ◽  
Feng Wang ◽  
Bikui Zhang ◽  
...  

This prospective observational study aimed to clinically describe voriconazole administrations and trough concentrations in patients with Child–Pugh class C and to investigate the variability of trough concentration. A total of 144 voriconazole trough concentrations from 43 Child–Pugh class C patients were analyzed. The majority of patients (62.8%) received adjustments. The repeated measured trough concentration was higher than the first and final ones generally (median, 4.33 vs. 2.99, 3.90 mg/L). Eight patients with ideal initial concentrations later got supratherapeutic with no adjusted daily dose, implying accumulation. There was a significant difference in concentrations among the six groups by daily dose (p = 0.006). The bivariate correlation analysis showed that sex, CYP2C19 genotyping, daily dose, prothrombin time activity, international normalized ratio, platelet, and Model for end-stage liver disease score were significant factors for concentration. Subsequently, the first four factors mentioned above entered into a stepwise multiple linear regression model (variance inflation factor <5), implying that CYP2C19 testing makes sense for precision medicine of Child–Pugh class C cirrhosis patients. The equation fits well and explains the 34.8% variety of concentrations (R2 = 0.348). In conclusion, it needs more cautious administration clinically due to no recommendation for Child–Pugh class C patients in the medication label. The adjustment of the administration regimen should be mainly based on the results of repeated therapeutic drug monitoring.


2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomefa E. Asempa ◽  
Joseph L. Kuti ◽  
Julie D. Seroogy ◽  
Allison S. Komirenko ◽  
David P. Nicolau

ABSTRACT Plazomicin is a new FDA-approved aminoglycoside antibiotic for complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI). In the product labeling, trough-based therapeutic drug management (TDM) is recommended for cUTI patients with renal impairment to prevent elevated trough concentrations associated with serum creatinine increases of ≥0.5 mg/dl above baseline. Herein, the utility of the Hartford nomogram to prevent plazomicin trough concentrations exceeding the TDM trough of 3 μg/ml and optimize the area under the curve (AUC) was assessed. The AUC reference range was defined as the 5th to 95th percentile AUC observed in the phase 3 cUTI trial (EPIC) (121 to 368 μg · h/ml). Observed 10-h plazomicin concentrations from patients in EPIC (n = 281) were plotted on the nomogram to determine an eligible dosing interval (every 24 h [q24h], q36h, q48h). Based on creatinine clearance (CLcr), a 15- or 10-mg/kg of body weight dose was simulated with the nomogram-derived interval. The nomogram recommended an extended interval (q36h and q48h) in 31% of patients. Compared with the 15 mg/kg q24h regimen received by patients with CLcr of ≥60 ml/min in EPIC, the nomogram-derived interval reduced the proportion of patients with troughs of ≥3 μg/ml (q36h, 27% versus 0%, P = 0.021; q48h, 57% versus 0%, P = 0.002) while significantly increasing the number of patients within the AUC range. Compared with the 8 to 12 mg/kg q24h regimen (received by patients with CLcr of >30 to 59 ml/min in EPIC), the nomogram-derived interval significantly reduced the proportion of troughs of ≥3μg/ml in the q48h cohort (72% versus 0%, P < 0.001) while maintaining a similar proportion of patients in the AUC range. Simulated application of the Hartford nomogram optimized plazomicin exposures in patients with cUTI while reducing troughs to <3 μg/ml.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 494
Author(s):  
Florent Ferrer ◽  
Jonathan Chauvin ◽  
Bénédicte DeVictor ◽  
Bruno Lacarelle ◽  
Jean-Laurent Deville ◽  
...  

Different target exposures with sunitinib have been proposed in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients, such as trough concentrations or AUCs. However, most of the time, rather than therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), clinical evidence is preferred to tailor dosing, i.e., by reducing the dose when treatment-related toxicities show, or increasing dosing if no signs of efficacy are observed. Here, we compared such empirical dose adjustment of sunitinib in mRCC patients, with the parallel dosing proposals of a PK/PD model with TDM support. In 31 evaluable patients treated with sunitinib, 53.8% had an empirical change in dosing after treatment started (i.e., 46.2% decrease in dosing, 7.6% increase in dosing). Clinical benefit was observed in 54.1% patients, including 8.3% with complete response. Overall, 58.1% of patients experienced treatment discontinuation eventually, either because of toxicities or progressive disease. When choosing 50–100 ng/mL trough concentrations as a target exposure (i.e., sunitinib + active metabolite N-desethyl sunitinib), 45% patients were adequately exposed. When considering 1200–2150 ng/mL.h as a target AUC (i.e., sunitinib + active metabolite N-desethyl sunitinib), only 26% patients were in the desired therapeutic window. TDM with retrospective PK/PD modeling would have suggested decreasing sunitinib dosing in a much larger number of patients as compared with empirical dose adjustment. Indeed, when using target trough concentrations, the model proposed reducing dosing for 61% patients, and up to 84% patients based upon target AUC. Conversely, the model proposed increasing dosing in 9.7% of patients when using target trough concentrations and in 6.5% patients when using target AUC. Overall, TDM with adaptive dosing would have led to tailoring sunitinib dosing in a larger number of patients (i.e., 53.8% vs. 71–91%, depending on the chosen metrics for target exposure) than a clinical-based decision. Interestingly, sunitinib dosing was empirically reduced in 41% patients who displayed early-onset severe toxicities, whereas model-based recommendations would have immediately proposed to reduce dosing in more than 80% of those patients. This observation suggests that early treatment-related toxicities could have been partly avoided using prospective PK/PD modeling with adaptive dosing. Conversely, the possible impact of model-based adapted dosing on efficacy could not be fully evaluated because no clear relationship was found between baseline exposure levels and sunitinib efficacy measured at 3 months.


Author(s):  
Takuto Takahashi ◽  
Maryam A. Mohamud ◽  
Angela R. Smith ◽  
Pamala A. Jacobson ◽  
Mutaz M. Jaber ◽  
...  

Background : Prophylactic voriconazole use is recommended in children undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Dosing considerations are essential due to its narrow therapeutic index. Known covariates do not sufficiently explain large interindividual pharmacokinetic (PK) variability of voriconazole. Moreover, knowledge of voriconazole PK for age <2 years is limited. Objectives : We investigated genetic and clinical covariate association with voriconazole interindividual PK variability and subsequently simulated dosing regimens in children. Methods : This study was conducted as a part of a single-institution, phase I study of intravenous voriconazole in children undergoing HCT. We conducted a population PK analysis and tested covariate effects on voriconazole PK, including 67 genetic variants and clinical variables. Results : We analyzed plasma voriconazole and n-oxide metabolite concentrations from 58 children aged <21 years (n=12 in age <2 years). A two-compartment parent mixed linear/nonlinear model best described our data. CYP2C19 phenotype and body weight were significant covariates (both p<0.05). Our model performance in age <2 years was comparable to other age groups. Simulation of the final model suggested the following dosages to attain target steady-state trough concentrations of 1.5 - 5.0 mg/L in CYP2C19 normal phenotype: 16 mg/kg (weight <15 kg), 12 mg/kg (weight 15-30 kg), 10 mg/kg (weight >30 kg), whereas dosages were 33-50% lower for CYP2C19 poor/intermediate and 25-50% higher for CYP2C19 rapid/ultrarapid phenotypes. Conclusions : We propose a new starting dosage regimen, combined with therapeutic drug monitoring for intravenous voriconazole in children of all ages. Future studies should validate this dosing regimen.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S646-S646
Author(s):  
Ashley I Weaver ◽  
Genene A Wilson ◽  
Emily Belarski ◽  
Allison Nelson ◽  
Madan Kumar ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pediatric vancomycin dosing varies based on age and renal function. Recent literature suggests previously recommended doses of 45-60 mg/kg/day may be insufficient to achieve an AUC:MIC ratio of 400-600 mg-hr/L and higher doses of at least 60 mg/kg/day may be required. However, data to guide dosing in adolescents is limited. Methods A single-center, retrospective chart review of patients aged 12 to 18 years who received vancomycin and had therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) performed between July 2017 to June 2020 were included. The primary endpoint was the median total daily dose (TDD) of vancomycin required to achieve therapeutic serum concentrations. Secondary endpoints were to characterize how factors such as age, weight, trough versus AUC monitoring, malignancy, and trauma may influence dosing. The safety endpoint was the development of acute kidney injury (AKI). Results 130 vancomycin courses in 86 patients were included. Baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. Of the 130 vancomycin courses, 50 courses (38%) achieved therapeutic serum concentrations at a median TDD of 49.8 mg/kg/day (IQR 42 – 59.4). This was not statistically different from the sub- or supra-therapeutic groups (p=0.22). Based on age, the median TDD for 12-14 year olds was higher at 60 mg/kg/day (IQR 45-78.8; n=14) than for 15-16 and 17-18 year olds [45.3 mg/kg/day (IQR 41.1-51; n=15), 48 mg/kg/day (IQR 42-52; n=21), respectively]. Obese patients needed a median TDD of 43.5 mg/kg/day vs at least 51 mg/kg/day in healthy and overweight patients. Finally, AUC guided dosing resulted in a slightly lower overall median TDD vs trough guided dosing (45.8 mg/kg/day vs 50.5 mg/kg/day). Additional dose requirements based on age, weight, TDM and other characteristics are presented in Table 2. Of the 15 patients who developed AKI per pRIFILE criteria, 2 were classified as injury and 3 as failure. Table 2. Total Daily Dose Course Analysis Conclusion To achieve therapeutic levels, adolescents 12 to14 years old need higher empiric doses of 60 mg/kg/day compared to 45 mg/kg/day in 15 to 18 year olds. Obese patients, however, may require lower TDD than underweight, healthy, and overweight patients. Patients that receive AUC versus trough monitoring may also require lower TDD to achieve therapeutic concentrations. More data is needed to further evaluate our findings. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 545-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kari A. Mergenhagen ◽  
Angela R. Borton

Vancomycin earned notoriety for its tendency to cause nephrotoxicity shortly after it was introduced into practice, though the impurities responsible for historically significant rates of nephrotoxicity are of minimal concern today. Increasing usage of vancomycin has provided evidence that the drug itself can be nephrotoxic, but the exact mechanism by which this occurs has not been determined. Various studies have identified risk factors associated with development of vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity, including total daily dose > 4 grams, trough levels > 20 mg/L, therapy exceeding 6 days, concurrent use of other nephrotoxic agents, preexisting renal disease, obesity, hypotensive episodes, and increasing severity of illness. Preventative strategies beyond risk assessment and therapeutic drug monitoring have shown little promise. Most cases of nephrotoxicity are reversible with discontinuation of vancomycin, but permanent renal damage can occur. This article is intended to serve as a practical review of vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity, including historical context, risk factors, and common methods to evaluate and define renal dysfunction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document