The Biogeoclimatic Ecosystem Classification Approach: an ecological framework for vegetation classification

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
William H. MacKenzie ◽  
Del V. Meidinger
2001 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry Hirvonen

The Canadian Forest Service, in cooperation with its partners, has a mandate to report on the health of Canada's forests and determine if, how, and why it is changing. A holistic perspective of forest health is taken whereby the ecosystem rather than a single element is considered. The use of the national ecological classification of Canada as a key reporting framework facilitates this task. Advantages for reporting purposes are several, including the use of ecological over jurisdictional boundaries to discuss ecosystems, wide national acceptance of the framework, and access to a wide array of other environmental databases that use the same framework. Compromises have to be made for forest health reporting as the ecological classification is not a forest ecosystem classification. However, advantages to using the framework for national reporting far outweigh these shortcomings. Key words: ecological land classification, forest health, national and international reporting


2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Viciani ◽  
Antonio Gabellini ◽  
Matilde Gennai ◽  
Bruno Foggi ◽  
Lorenzo Lastrucci

ARCTIC ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald S. McLennan ◽  
William H. MacKenzie ◽  
Del Meidinger ◽  
Johann Wagner ◽  
Christopher Arko

A Canadian Arctic-Subarctic Biogeoclimatic Ecosystem Classification (CASBEC) is proposed as a standardized classification approach for Subarctic and Arctic terrestrial ecosystems across Canada and potentially throughout the circumpolar area. The CASBEC is grounded in long-standing terrestrial ecosystem classification theory and builds on concepts developed for ecosystems in British Columbia, Quebec, and Yukon. The fundamental classification unit of the CASBEC, the plant association, is compatible with the lower-level classifications of the Arctic Vegetation Classification (AVC), the Canadian National Vegetation Classification (CNVC), and the United States National Vegetation Classification (USNVC) and is used to generate a classification and nomenclature for Arctic and Subarctic terrestrial ecological communities. The use of a multi-scalar ecosystem framework, such as that developed by the British Columbia Biogeoclimatic Ecosystem Classification, provides an ecological context to use classified plant associations to delineate and define climatically equivalent regional scale climate units (biogeoclimatic subzones) and ecologically equivalent local-scale site units within biogeoclimatic subzones. A standardized framework and taxonomy of ecosystem classification for Subarctic and Arctic terrestrial ecological communities will facilitate the planning, coordination, and applicability of terrestrial ecological monitoring and research. The CASBEC classification and high-resolution ecosystem mapping are being used to develop an effective experimental design, to select ecosite types for long-term monitoring, and to extrapolate results to landscape scales in the Experimental and Reference Area of the Canadian High Arctic Research Station (CHARS) in Cambridge Bay. Widespread adoption of the CASBEC could provide a spatial and functionally scalable framework and a common language for interpreting, integrating, coordinating, and communicating Arctic and Subarctic monitoring, research, and land management activities across the Canadian North and around the circumpolar area.


2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-170
Author(s):  
Leslie R. Brown ◽  
George J. Bredenkamp

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document