scholarly journals Comment on “Dry reforming of methane by stable Ni–Mo nanocatalysts on single-crystalline MgO”

Science ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 368 (6492) ◽  
pp. eabb5459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Hang Hu ◽  
Eli Ruckenstein

Song et al. (Reports, 14 February 2020, p. 777) ignore the reported efficient Ni/MgO solid-solution catalysts and overstate the novelty and importance of the Mo-doped Ni/MgO catalysts for the dry reforming of methane. We show that the Ni/MgO solid-solution catalyst that we reported in 1995, which is efficient and stable for the dry reforming, is superior to the Mo-doped Ni/MgO catalyst.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Stivenson Sandoval-Bohorquez ◽  
Edgar M. Morales-Valencia ◽  
Carlos Omar Castillo-Araiza ◽  
Luz Marina Ballesteros Rueda ◽  
Víctor Gabriel Baldovino Medrano

The dry reforming of methane is a promising technology for the abatement of CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub>. Solid solution Ni–La oxide catalysts are characterized by their long–term stability (100h) when tested at full conversion. The kinetics of dry reforming over this type of catalysts has been studied using both power law and Langmuir–Hinshelwood based approaches. However, these studies typically deal with fitting the net CH<sub>4</sub> rate hence disregarding competing and parallel surface processes and the different possible configurations of the active surface. In this work, we synthesized a solid solution Ni–La oxide catalyst and tested six Langmuir–Hinshelwood mechanisms considering both single and dual active sites for assessing the kinetics of dry reforming and the competing reverse water gas shift reaction and investigated the performance of the derived kinetic models. In doing this, it was found that: (1) all the net rates were better fitted by a single–site model that considered that the first C–H bond cleavage in methane occurred over a <a>metal−oxygen </a>pair site; (2) this model predicted the existence of a nearly saturated nickel surface with chemisorbed oxygen adatoms derived from the dissociation of CO<sub>2</sub>; (3) the dissociation of CO<sub>2</sub> can either be an inhibitory or an irrelevant step, and it can also modify the apparent activation energy for CH<sub>4</sub> activation. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the dry reforming reaction's kinetics and provide a robust kinetic model for the design and scale–up of the process.


Science ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 368 (6492) ◽  
pp. eabb5680
Author(s):  
Youngdong Song ◽  
Ercan Ozdemir ◽  
Sreerangappa Ramesh ◽  
Aldiar Adishev ◽  
Saravanan Subramanian ◽  
...  

Hu and Ruckenstein state that our findings were overclaimed and not new, despite our presentation of evidence for the Nanocatalysts on Single Crystal Edges (NOSCE) mechanism. Their arguments do not take into account fundamental differences between our Ni-Mo/MgO catalyst and their NiO/MgO preparations.


Science ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 367 (6479) ◽  
pp. 777-781 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youngdong Song ◽  
Ercan Ozdemir ◽  
Sreerangappa Ramesh ◽  
Aldiar Adishev ◽  
Saravanan Subramanian ◽  
...  

Large-scale carbon fixation requires high-volume chemicals production from carbon dioxide. Dry reforming of methane could provide an economically feasible route if coke- and sintering-resistant catalysts were developed. Here, we report a molybdenum-doped nickel nanocatalyst that is stabilized at the edges of a single-crystalline magnesium oxide (MgO) support and show quantitative production of synthesis gas from dry reforming of methane. The catalyst runs more than 850 hours of continuous operation under 60 liters per unit mass of catalyst per hour reactive gas flow with no detectable coking. Synchrotron studies also show no sintering and reveal that during activation, 2.9 nanometers as synthesized crystallites move to combine into stable 17-nanometer grains at the edges of MgO crystals above the Tammann temperature. Our findings enable an industrially and economically viable path for carbon reclamation, and the “Nanocatalysts On Single Crystal Edges” technique could lead to stable catalyst designs for many challenging reactions.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Stivenson Sandoval-Bohorquez ◽  
Edgar M. Morales-Valencia ◽  
Carlos Omar Castillo-Araiza ◽  
Luz Marina Ballesteros Rueda ◽  
Víctor Gabriel Baldovino Medrano

The dry reforming of methane is a promising technology for the abatement of CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub>. Solid solution Ni–La oxide catalysts are characterized by their long–term stability (100h) when tested at full conversion. The kinetics of dry reforming over this type of catalysts has been studied using both power law and Langmuir–Hinshelwood based approaches. However, these studies typically deal with fitting the net CH<sub>4</sub> rate hence disregarding competing and parallel surface processes and the different possible configurations of the active surface. In this work, we synthesized a solid solution Ni–La oxide catalyst and tested six Langmuir–Hinshelwood mechanisms considering both single and dual active sites for assessing the kinetics of dry reforming and the competing reverse water gas shift reaction and investigated the performance of the derived kinetic models. In doing this, it was found that: (1) all the net rates were better fitted by a single–site model that considered that the first C–H bond cleavage in methane occurred over a <a>metal−oxygen </a>pair site; (2) this model predicted the existence of a nearly saturated nickel surface with chemisorbed oxygen adatoms derived from the dissociation of CO<sub>2</sub>; (3) the dissociation of CO<sub>2</sub> can either be an inhibitory or an irrelevant step, and it can also modify the apparent activation energy for CH<sub>4</sub> activation. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the dry reforming reaction's kinetics and provide a robust kinetic model for the design and scale–up of the process.


2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (11) ◽  
pp. 1256-1263
Author(s):  
R. R. Grigoryan ◽  
S. G. Aloyan ◽  
V. R. Harutyunyan ◽  
S. D. Arsentev ◽  
L. A. Tavadyan

2021 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 101411
Author(s):  
Nicolas Abdel Karim Aramouni ◽  
Joseph Zeaiter ◽  
Witold Kwapinski ◽  
James J. Leahy ◽  
Mohammad N. Ahmad

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document