scholarly journals The proteasome controls ESCRT-III–mediated cell division in an archaeon

Science ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 369 (6504) ◽  
pp. eaaz2532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Tarrason Risa ◽  
Fredrik Hurtig ◽  
Sian Bray ◽  
Anne E. Hafner ◽  
Lena Harker-Kirschneck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Division Ring ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Sulfolobus Acidocaldarius ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Membrane Remodeling

Sulfolobus acidocaldarius is the closest experimentally tractable archaeal relative of eukaryotes and, despite lacking obvious cyclin-dependent kinase and cyclin homologs, has an ordered eukaryote-like cell cycle with distinct phases of DNA replication and division. Here, in exploring the mechanism of cell division in S. acidocaldarius, we identify a role for the archaeal proteasome in regulating the transition from the end of one cell cycle to the beginning of the next. Further, we identify the archaeal ESCRT-III homolog, CdvB, as a key target of the proteasome and show that its degradation triggers division by allowing constriction of the CdvB1:CdvB2 ESCRT-III division ring. These findings offer a minimal mechanism for ESCRT-III–mediated membrane remodeling and point to a conserved role for the proteasome in eukaryotic and archaeal cell cycle control.

scholarly journals Cell cycle arrest of cdc mutants and specificity of the RAD9 checkpoint.

Genetics ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
T A Weinert ◽  
L H Hartwell
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Restrictive Temperature ◽  
A Cell ◽  
G2 Phase ◽  
Rad Mutants

Abstract In eucaryotes a cell cycle control called a checkpoint ensures that mitosis occurs only after chromosomes are completely replicated and any damage is repaired. The function of this checkpoint in budding yeast requires the RAD9 gene. Here we examine the role of the RAD9 gene in the arrest of the 12 cell division cycle (cdc) mutants, temperature-sensitive lethal mutants that arrest in specific phases of the cell cycle at a restrictive temperature. We found that in four cdc mutants the cdc rad9 cells failed to arrest after a shift to the restrictive temperature, rather they continued cell division and died rapidly, whereas the cdc RAD cells arrested and remained viable. The cell cycle and genetic phenotypes of the 12 cdc RAD mutants indicate the function of the RAD9 checkpoint is phase-specific and signal-specific. First, the four cdc RAD mutants that required RAD9 each arrested in the late S/G2 phase after a shift to the restrictive temperature when DNA replication was complete or nearly complete, and second, each leaves DNA lesions when the CDC gene product is limiting for cell division. Three of the four CDC genes are known to encode DNA replication enzymes. We found that the RAD17 gene is also essential for the function of the RAD9 checkpoint because it is required for phase-specific arrest of the same four cdc mutants. We also show that both X- or UV-irradiated cells require the RAD9 and RAD17 genes for delay in the G2 phase. Together, these results indicate that the RAD9 checkpoint is apparently activated only by DNA lesions and arrests cell division only in the late S/G2 phase.

Increase in macromolecular amounts during the cell cycle of Tetrahymena: a contribution to cell cycle control

1979 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-124
Author(s):  
G. Cleffmann ◽  
W.O. Reuter ◽  
H.M. Seyfert
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Protein Content ◽  
Cell Size ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Negative Control ◽  
Dna Amount ◽  
Protein Ratio ◽  
Initiation Of Dna Replication

Increases in RNA, protein and cell size were determined cytophotometrically during the cell division cycle of Tetrahymena. For these parameters different patterns were found. RNA accumulates slowly during G1 period and faster during macronuclear S. This agrees with the changing uridine incorporation rate which is at least partly related to the varying macronuclear DNA amount. Increases in protein content and cell size occur mainly during G1 and G2. This pattern was confirmed by determining the RNA: protein ratio in individual cells. It is minimal at the end of the G1 period. These findings and evidence from the literature suggest that initiation of DNA replication is under negative control by the relative RNA content of the cell.

scholarly journals Regulation of Cell Division in Bacteria by Monitoring Genome Integrity and DNA Replication Status

2019 ◽  
Vol 202 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter E. Burby ◽  
Lyle A. Simmons
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Content Type

ABSTRACT All organisms regulate cell cycle progression by coordinating cell division with DNA replication status. In eukaryotes, DNA damage or problems with replication fork progression induce the DNA damage response (DDR), causing cyclin-dependent kinases to remain active, preventing further cell cycle progression until replication and repair are complete. In bacteria, cell division is coordinated with chromosome segregation, preventing cell division ring formation over the nucleoid in a process termed nucleoid occlusion. In addition to nucleoid occlusion, bacteria induce the SOS response after replication forks encounter DNA damage or impediments that slow or block their progression. During SOS induction, Escherichia coli expresses a cytoplasmic protein, SulA, that inhibits cell division by directly binding FtsZ. After the SOS response is turned off, SulA is degraded by Lon protease, allowing for cell division to resume. Recently, it has become clear that SulA is restricted to bacteria closely related to E. coli and that most bacteria enforce the DNA damage checkpoint by expressing a small integral membrane protein. Resumption of cell division is then mediated by membrane-bound proteases that cleave the cell division inhibitor. Further, many bacterial cells have mechanisms to inhibit cell division that are regulated independently from the canonical LexA-mediated SOS response. In this review, we discuss several pathways used by bacteria to prevent cell division from occurring when genome instability is detected or before the chromosome has been fully replicated and segregated.

scholarly journals Talin mechanosensitivity is modulated by a direct interaction with cyclin-dependent kinase-1

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosemarie E. Gough ◽  
Matthew C. Jones ◽  
Thomas Zacharchenko ◽  
Shimin Le ◽  
Miao Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cell Adhesion ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Mechanical Response ◽  
Direct Interaction ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulator ◽  
Direct Binding

AbstractTalin is a mechanosensitive component of adhesion complexes that directly couples integrins to the actin cytoskeleton. In response to force, talin undergoes switch-like behaviour of its multiple rod domains that modulate interactions with its binding partners. Cyclin-dependent kinase-1 (CDK1) is a key regulator of the cell cycle, exerting its effects through synchronised phosphorylation of a large number of protein targets. CDK1 activity also maintains adhesion during interphase, and its inhibition is a prerequisite for the tightly choreographed changes in cell shape and adhesiveness that are required for successful completion of mitosis. Using a combination of biochemical, structural and cell biological approaches, we demonstrate a direct interaction between talin and CDK1 that occurs at sites of integrin-mediated adhesion. Mutagenesis demonstrated that CDK1 contains a functional talin-binding LD motif, and the binding site within talin was pinpointed to helical bundle R8 through the use of recombinant fragments. Talin also contains a consensus CDK1 phosphorylation motif centred on S1589; a site that was phosphorylated by CDK1in vitro. A phosphomimetic mutant of this site within talin lowered the binding affinity of KANK and weakened the mechanical response of the region, potentially altering downstream mechanotransduction pathways. The direct binding of the master cell cycle regulator, CDK1, to the primary integrin effector, talin, therefore provides a primordial solution for coupling the cell proliferation and cell adhesion machineries, and thereby enables microenvironmental control of cell division in multicellular organisms.SummaryThe direct binding of the master cell cycle regulator, CDK1, to the primary integrin effector, talin, provides a primordial solution for coupling the cell proliferation and cell adhesion machineries, and thereby enables microenvironmental control of cell division.

scholarly journals p12DOC-1 Is a Novel Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2-Associated Protein

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (17) ◽  
pp. 6300-6307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoru Shintani ◽  
Hiroe Ohyama ◽  
Xue Zhang ◽  
Jim McBride ◽  
Kou Matsuo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Cell Division Cycle ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Data Support ◽  
Normal Keratinocytes ◽  
Active Pool ◽  
Growth Suppressor

ABSTRACT Regulated cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) levels and activities are critical for the proper progression of the cell division cycle. p12DOC-1 is a growth suppressor isolated from normal keratinocytes. We report that p12DOC-1 associates with CDK2. More specifically, p12DOC-1 associates with the monomeric nonphosphorylated form of CDK2 (p33CDK2). Ectopic expression of p12DOC-1 resulted in decreased cellular CDK2 and reduced CDK2-associated kinase activities and was accompanied by a shift in the cell cycle positions of p12DOC-1transfectants (↑ G1 and ↓ S). The p12DOC-1-mediated decrease of CDK2 was prevented if the p12DOC-1 transfectants were grown in the presence of the proteosome inhibitor clasto-lactacystin β-lactone, suggesting that p12DOC-1 may target CDK2 for proteolysis. A CDK2 binding mutant was created and was found to revert p12DOC-1-mediated, CDK2-associated cell cycle phenotypes. These data support p12DOC-1 as a specific CDK2-associated protein that negatively regulates CDK2 activities by sequestering the monomeric pool of CDK2 and/or targets CDK2 for proteolysis, reducing the active pool of CDK2.

Expression of the cell cycle control gene, cdc25, is constitutive in the segmental founder cells but is cell-cycle-regulated in the micromeres of leech embryos

Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (9) ◽  
pp. 3035-3043 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.T. Bissen
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Control Gene ◽  
Cdc25 Phosphatase ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Cell Divisions ◽  
Zygotic Transcription ◽  
Founder Cells ◽  
Drosophila Embryos

The identifiable cells of leech embryos exhibit characteristic differences in the timing of cell division. To elucidate the mechanisms underlying these cell-specific differences in cell cycle timing, the leech cdc25 gene was isolated because Cdc25 phosphatase regulates the asynchronous cell divisions of postblastoderm Drosophila embryos. Examination of the distribution of cdc25 RNA and the zygotic expression of cdc25 in identified cells of leech embryos revealed lineage-dependent mechanisms of regulation. The early blastomeres, macromeres and teloblasts have steady levels of maternal cdc25 RNA throughout their cell cycles. The levels of cdc25 RNA remain constant throughout the cell cycles of the segmental founder cells, but the majority of these transcripts are zygotically produced. Cdc25 RNA levels fluctuate during the cell cycles of the micromeres. The levels peak during early G2, due to a burst of zygotic transcription, and then decline as the cell cycles progress. These data suggest that cells of different lineages employ different strategies of cell cycle control.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document