scholarly journals A noncanonical inhibitory circuit dampens behavioral sensitivity to light

Science ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 368 (6490) ◽  
pp. 527-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuma Sonoda ◽  
Jennifer Y. Li ◽  
Nikolas W. Hayes ◽  
Jonathan C. Chan ◽  
Yudai Okabe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Gaba Release ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Low Light ◽  
Excitatory Neurotransmitter ◽  
Inhibitory Neurotransmitter ◽  
Light Levels ◽  
Behavioral Sensitivity ◽  
Inhibitory Circuit

Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) drive diverse, light-evoked behaviors that range from conscious visual perception to subconscious, non–image-forming behaviors. It is thought that RGCs primarily drive these functions through the release of the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate. We identified a subset of melanopsin-expressing intrinsically photosensitive RGCs (ipRGCs) in mice that release the inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) at non–image-forming brain targets. GABA release from ipRGCs dampened the sensitivity of both the pupillary light reflex and circadian photoentrainment, thereby shifting the dynamic range of these behaviors to higher light levels. Our results identify an inhibitory RGC population in the retina and provide a circuit-level mechanism that contributes to the relative insensitivity of non–image-forming behaviors at low light levels.

scholarly journals Dopamine D1 and D4 receptors contribute to light adaptation in ON-sustained retinal ganglion cells

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Flood ◽  
Erika D. Eggers
Keyword(s):  
Light Adaptation ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Cell Responses ◽  
Light Levels ◽  
Excitatory Activity ◽  
Effect Of Light

AbstractAdaptation of ganglion cells to increasing light levels is a crucial property of the retina. The retina must respond to light intensities that vary by 10-12 orders of magnitude, but the dynamic range of ganglion cell responses only covers ~1000 orders of magnitude. Dopamine is a crucial neuromodulator for light adaptation and activates receptors in the D1 family – D1Rs that are expressed on horizontal cells and some bipolar and ganglion cells- and the D2 family – D2Rs that are expressed on dopaminergic amacrine cells and D4Rs that are primarily expressed on photoreceptors. However, how these receptors change the synaptic properties of the inputs to ganglion cells is not yet clear. Here we used single cell retinal patch-clamp recordings from the mouse retina to determine how activating D1Rs and D4Rs changed the light-evoked and spontaneous excitatory inputs to ON-sustained (ON-s) ganglion cells. We found that both D1R and D4R activation decrease the light-evoked excitatory inputs to ON-s ganglion cells, but that only the sum of activating the two receptors was similar to the effect of light adaptation to a rod-saturating background. The largest effects on spontaneous excitatory activity of both D1R and D4R agonists was on the frequency of events, suggesting that D1Rs and D4Rs are acting upstream of the ganglion cells.

scholarly journals Dopamine D1 and D4 receptors contribute to light adaptation in ON-sustained retinal ganglion cells

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Daniel Flood ◽  
Erika D Eggers
Keyword(s):  
Light Adaptation ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Cell Responses ◽  
Light Levels ◽  
Excitatory Activity ◽  
Effect Of Light

The adaptation of ganglion cells to increasing light levels is a crucial property of the retina. The retina must respond to light intensities that vary by 10-12 orders of magnitude, but the dynamic range of ganglion cell responses covers only ~3 orders of magnitude. Dopamine is a crucial neuromodulator for light adaptation and activates receptors in the D1 and D2 families. D1Rs are expressed on horizontal cells and some bipolar, amacrine and ganglion cells. In the D2 family D2Rs are expressed on dopaminergic amacrine cells and D4Rs are primarily expressed on photoreceptors. However, the roles of activating these receptors to modulate the synaptic properties of the inputs to ganglion cells are not yet clear. Here we used single cell retinal patch-clamp recordings from the mouse retina to determine how activating D1Rs and D4Rs changed the light-evoked and spontaneous excitatory inputs to ON-sustained (ON-s) ganglion cells. We found that both D1R and D4R activation decrease the light-evoked excitatory inputs to ON-s ganglion cells, but that only the sum of the peak response decrease due to activating the two receptors was similar to the effect of light adaptation to a rod-saturating background. The largest effects on spontaneous excitatory activity of both D1R and D4R agonists was on the frequency of events, suggesting that both D1Rs and D4Rs are acting upstream of the ganglion cells.

scholarly journals GABA release selectively regulates synapse development at distinct inputs on direction-selective retinal ganglion cells

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (51) ◽  
pp. E12083-E12090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Bleckert ◽  
Chi Zhang ◽  
Maxwell H. Turner ◽  
David Koren ◽  
David M. Berson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Selective Reduction ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Gaba Release ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Inhibitory Synapses ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Gabaergic Transmission ◽  
Starburst Amacrine Cells ◽  
Receptor Clusters

Synaptic inhibition controls a neuron’s output via functionally distinct inputs at two subcellular compartments, the cell body and the dendrites. It is unclear whether the assembly of these distinct inhibitory inputs can be regulated independently by neurotransmission. In the mammalian retina, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) release from starburst amacrine cells (SACs) onto the dendrites of on–off direction-selective ganglion cells (ooDSGCs) is essential for directionally selective responses. We found that ooDSGCs also receive GABAergic input on their somata from other amacrine cells (ACs), including ACs containing the vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP). When net GABAergic transmission is reduced, somatic, but not dendritic, GABAA receptor clusters on the ooDSGC increased in number and size. Correlative fluorescence imaging and serial electron microscopy revealed that these enlarged somatic receptor clusters are localized to synapses. By contrast, selectively blocking vesicular GABA release from either SACs or VIP ACs did not alter dendritic or somatic receptor distributions on the ooDSGCs, showing that neither SAC nor VIP AC GABA release alone is required for the development of inhibitory synapses in ooDSGCs. Furthermore, a reduction in net GABAergic transmission, but not a selective reduction from SACs, increased excitatory drive onto ooDSGCs. This increased excitation may drive a homeostatic increase in ooDSGC somatic GABAA receptors. Differential regulation of GABAA receptors on the ooDSGC’s soma and dendrites could facilitate homeostatic control of the ooDSGC’s output while enabling the assembly of the GABAergic connectivity underlying direction selectivity to be indifferent to altered transmission.

Investigating visual mechanisms underlying scene brightness

2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
UC Besenecker ◽  
JD Bullough
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Spectral Sensitivity ◽  
Short Wavelength ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Forced Choice ◽  
Light Sources ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Brightness Perception ◽  
Light Levels ◽  
Relative Brightness

Short-wavelength (<500 nm) output of light sources enhances scene brightness perception in the low-to-moderate photopic range. This appears to be partially explained by a contribution from short-wavelength cones. Recent evidence from experiments on humans suggests that intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) containing the photopigment melanopsin might also contribute to spectral sensitivity for scene brightness perception. An experiment was conducted to investigate this possibility at two different light levels, near 10 lx and near 100 lx. Subjects provided forced-choice brightness judgments and relative brightness magnitude judgments when comparing two different amber-coloured stimuli with similar chromaticities. A provisional brightness metric including an ipRGC contribution was able to predict the data with substantially smaller errors than a metric based on cone input only.

scholarly journals Diverse Cell Types, Circuits, and Mechanisms for Color Vision in the Vertebrate Retina

2019 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 1527-1573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wallace B. Thoreson ◽  
Dennis M. Dacey
Keyword(s):  
Color Vision ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Color Perception ◽  
Visible Spectrum ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Photon Flux ◽  
Low Light ◽  
Vertebrate Retina ◽  
Light Levels ◽  
Synaptic Interactions

Synaptic interactions to extract information about wavelength, and thus color, begin in the vertebrate retina with three classes of light-sensitive cells: rod photoreceptors at low light levels, multiple types of cone photoreceptors that vary in spectral sensitivity, and intrinsically photosensitive ganglion cells that contain the photopigment melanopsin. When isolated from its neighbors, a photoreceptor confounds photon flux with wavelength and so by itself provides no information about color. The retina has evolved elaborate color opponent circuitry for extracting wavelength information by comparing the activities of different photoreceptor types broadly tuned to different parts of the visible spectrum. We review studies concerning the circuit mechanisms mediating opponent interactions in a range of species, from tetrachromatic fish with diverse color opponent cell types to common dichromatic mammals where cone opponency is restricted to a subset of specialized circuits. Distinct among mammals, primates have reinvented trichromatic color vision using novel strategies to incorporate evolution of an additional photopigment gene into the foveal structure and circuitry that supports high-resolution vision. Color vision is absent at scotopic light levels when only rods are active, but rods interact with cone signals to influence color perception at mesopic light levels. Recent evidence suggests melanopsin-mediated signals, which have been identified as a substrate for setting circadian rhythms, may also influence color perception. We consider circuits that may mediate these interactions. While cone opponency is a relatively simple neural computation, it has been implemented in vertebrates by diverse neural mechanisms that are not yet fully understood.

Light adaptation in the primate retina: Analysis of changes in gain and dynamics of monkey retinal ganglion cells

1990 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Purpura ◽  
Daniel Tranchina ◽  
Ehud Kaplan ◽  
Robert M. Shapley
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Negative Feedback ◽  
Light Adaptation ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Light Level ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
M Cell ◽  
Feedback Model ◽  
Light Levels

AbstractThe responses of monkey retinal ganglion cells to sinusoidal stimuli of various temporal frequencies were measured and analyzed at a number of mean light levels. Temporal modulation tuning functions (TMTFs) were measured at each mean level by varying the drift rate of a sine-wave grating of fixed spatial frequency and contrast. The changes seen in ganglion cell temporal responses with changes in adaptation state were similar to those observed in human subjects and in turtle horizontal cells and cones tested with sinusoidally flickering stimuli; “Weber's Law” behavior was seen at low temporal frequencies but not at higher temporal frequencies. Temporal responses were analyzed in two ways: (1) at each light level, the TMTFs were fit by a model consisting of a cascade of low- and high-pass filters; (2) the family of TMTFs collected over a range of light levels for a given cell was fit by a linear negative feedback model in which the gain of the feedback was proportional to the mean light level. Analysis (1) revealed that the temporal responses of one class of monkey ganglion cells (M cells) were more phasic at both photopic and mesopic light levels than the responses of P ganglion cells. In analysis (2), the linear negative feedback model accounted reasonably well for changes in gain and dynamics seen in three P cells and one M cell. From the feedback model, it was possible to estimate the light level at which the dark-adapted gain of the cone pathways in the primate retina fell by a factor of two. This value was two to three orders of magnitude lower than the value estimated from recordings of isolated monkey cones. Thus, while a model which includes a single stage of negative feedback can account for the changes in gain and dynamics associated with light adaptation in the photopic and mesopic ranges of vision, the underlying physical mechanisms are unknown and may involve elements in the primate retina other than the cone.

Test results from an imager for scenes with high dynamic range and low light levels

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. P. Osterman ◽  
W. Good ◽  
R. Philbrick ◽  
L. Schneider ◽  
P. Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Range ◽  
High Dynamic Range ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Low Light ◽  
Light Levels ◽  
High Dynamic

scholarly journals Scotopic Vision Is Selectively Processed in Thick-Type Columns in Human Extrastriate Cortex

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger B H Tootell ◽  
Shahin Nasr
Keyword(s):  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Extrastriate Cortex ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Rod Photoreceptors ◽  
Scotopic Vision ◽  
Functional Connections ◽  
Light Levels ◽  
Versus Color ◽  
Parallel Streams ◽  
The Brain

Abstract In humans, visual stimuli can be perceived across an enormous range of light levels. Evidence suggests that different neural mechanisms process different subdivisions of this range. For instance, in the retina, stimuli presented at very low (scotopic) light levels activate rod photoreceptors, whereas cone photoreceptors are activated relatively more at higher (photopic) light levels. Similarly, different retinal ganglion cells are activated by scotopic versus photopic stimuli. However, in the brain, it remains unknown whether scotopic versus photopic information is: 1) processed in distinct channels, or 2) neurally merged. Using high-resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging at 7 T, we confirmed the first hypothesis. We first localized thick versus thin-type columns within areas V2, V3, and V4, based on photopic selectivity to motion versus color, respectively. Next, we found that scotopic stimuli selectively activated thick- (compared to thin-) type columns in V2 and V3 (in measurements of both overlap and amplitude) and V4 (based on overlap). Finally, we found stronger resting-state functional connections between scotopically dominated area MT with thick- (compared to thin-) type columns in areas V2, V3, and V4. We conclude that scotopic stimuli are processed in partially segregated parallel streams, emphasizing magnocellular influence, from retina through middle stages of visual cortex.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document