scholarly journals Response to Comment on "Abiotic Pyrite Formation Produces a Large Fe Isotope Fractionation"

Science ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 335 (6068) ◽  
pp. 538-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Guilbaud ◽  
I. B. Butler ◽  
R. M. Ellam
Science ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 335 (6068) ◽  
pp. 538-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. D. Czaja ◽  
C. M. Johnson ◽  
K. E. Yamaguchi ◽  
B. L. Beard

2018 ◽  
Vol 488 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Rolison ◽  
Claudine H. Stirling ◽  
Rob Middag ◽  
Melanie Gault-Ringold ◽  
Ejin George ◽  
...  

1983 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. G. Love ◽  
M. L. Coleman ◽  
C. D. Curtis

ABSTRACTPyrite textures are described and illustrated and stable S-isotope data are presented from the Alton (Gastrioceras listen) marine horizon of the Westphalian Lower Coal Measures, from sections near Penistone in central northern England, with the object of relating the paragenetic sequence of pyrite formation to the conditions of sediment deposition and diagenesis. The earliest diagenetic pyrite is dispersed as framboidal and related textures. It is followed in the marine shale, coal and ganister by more localised but more intense pyrite deposition and replacement in a variety of textures. Most of this is precompactional in age, but some, together with pyrite in veinlets and cleat, is postcompactional. Marcasite is rare and mainly late. δ34S ratios range between −35·31‰ and +20·39‰. There is a definite trend from lighter values (−1·15 ± 6·47‰) in the marine part of the sequence to much heavier values (+12·73 ± 7·66‰) in the sediment below the coal. This allows the relationship of the earliest pyrite deposition in the coal-peat and ganister to the chemistry of their own depositional fresh water to be seen but then relates the main pyrite deposition to the influx of the marine-water sulphate of the Alton horizon, and shows the penetration of this influence downward into the coal-peat and its seat-bed.


Minerals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 444
Author(s):  
Song Xue ◽  
Yaoling Niu ◽  
Yanhong Chen ◽  
Yining Shi ◽  
Boyang Xia ◽  
...  

Fe isotopes have been applied to the petrogenesis of ore deposits. However, the behavior of iron isotopes in the mineralization of porphyry-skarn deposits is still poorly understood. In this study, we report the Fe isotopes of ore mineral separations (magnetite, pyrite, chalcopyrite and pyrrhotite) from two different skarn deposits, i.e., the Tonglvshan Cu-Fe skarn deposit developed in an oxidized hydrothermal system and the Anqing Cu skarn deposit developed in a reduced hydrothermal system. In both deposits, the Fe isotopes of calculated equilibrium fluids are lighter than those of the intrusions responsible for the skarn and porphyry mineralization, corroborating the “light-Fe fluid” hypothesis. Interestingly, chalcopyrite in the oxidized-Tonglvshan skarn deposit has lighter Fe than chalcopyrite in the reduced-Anqing skarn deposit, which is best understood as the result of the prior precipitation of magnetite (heavy Fe) from the ore fluid in the oxidized-Tonglvshan systems and the prior precipitation of pyrrhotite (light Fe) from the ore fluid in the reduced-Anqing system. The δ56Fe for pyrite shows an inverse correlation with δ56Fe of magnetite in the Tonglvshan. In both deposits, the Fe isotope fractionation between chalcopyrite and pyrite is offset from the equilibrium line at 350 °C and lies between the FeS-chalcopyrite equilibrium line and pyrite-chalcopyrite equilibrium line at 350 °C. These observations are consistent with the FeS pathway towards pyrite formation. That is, Fe isotopes fractionation during pyrite formation depends on a path from the initial FeS-fluid equilibrium towards the pyrite-fluid equilibrium due to the increasing extent of Fe isotopic exchange with fluids. This finding, together with the data from other deposits, allows us to propose that the pathway effect of pyrite formation in the Porphyry-skarn deposit mineralization is the dominant mechanism that controls Fe isotope characteristics.


Science ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 332 (6037) ◽  
pp. 1548-1551 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Guilbaud ◽  
I. B. Butler ◽  
R. M. Ellam

1989 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 244-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald L. Wolberg

The minerals pyrite and marcasite (broadly termed pyritic minerals) are iron sulfides that are common if not ubiquitous in sedimentary rocks, especially in association with organic materials (Berner, 1970). In most marine sedimentary associations, pyrite and marcasite are associated with organic sediments rich in dissolved sulfate and iron minerals. Because of the rapid consumption of sulfate in freshwater environments, however, pyrite formation is more restricted in nonmarine sediments (Berner, 1983). The origin of the sulfur in nonmarine environments must lie within pre-existing rocks or volcanic detritus; a relatively small, but significant contribution may derive from plant and animal decomposition products.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Horst ◽  
Magali Bonifacie ◽  
Gérard Bardoux ◽  
Hans-Hermann Richnow

In this study we investigated the isotope fractionation of the abiotic sink (hydrolysis, halide exchange) of methyl halides in water.<br>


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fotios Fouskas ◽  
◽  
William Gilhooly ◽  
Josef P. Werne ◽  
Molly D. O'Beirne

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document