Species Interactions in a Parasite Community Drive Infection Risk in a Wildlife Population

Sandra Telfer; Xavier Lambin; Richard Birtles; Pablo Beldomenico; Sarah Burthe; Steve Paterson; Mike Begon

doi:10.1126/science.1190333

Species Interactions in a Parasite Community Drive Infection Risk in a Wildlife Population

Science ◽

10.1126/science.1190333 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 330 (6001) ◽

pp. 243-246 ◽

Cited By ~ 353

Author(s):

Sandra Telfer ◽

Xavier Lambin ◽

Richard Birtles ◽

Pablo Beldomenico ◽

Sarah Burthe ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Species Interactions ◽

Parasite Community ◽

Infection Risk ◽

Wildlife Population

Download Full-text

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Species interactions in a parasite community drive infection risk in a wildlife population.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature ◽

10.3410/f.7412956.7693054 ◽

2010 ◽

Author(s):

Nigel Yoccoz

Keyword(s):

Species Interactions ◽

Parasite Community ◽

Infection Risk ◽

Wildlife Population

Download Full-text

Spatial variation in species' roles in host–helminth networks

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences ◽

10.1098/rstb.2020.0361 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 376 (1837) ◽

pp. 20200361 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Tad A. Dallas ◽

Pedro Jordano

Keyword(s):

Species Interactions ◽

Parasite Species ◽

Environmental Gradients ◽

Dimensional Space ◽

Single Species ◽

Parasite Community ◽

Helminth Parasite ◽

Helminth Parasites ◽

Two Dimensional ◽

Species Roles

Species interactions may vary considerably across space as a result of spatial and environmental gradients. With respect to host–parasite interactions, this suggests that host and parasite species may play different functional roles across the different networks they occur in. Using a global occurrence database of helminth parasites, we examine the conservation of species' roles using data on host–helminth interactions from 299 geopolitical locations. Defining species' roles in a two-dimensional space which captures the tendency of species to be more densely linked within species subgroups than between subgroups, we quantified species' roles in two ways, which captured if and which species' roles are conserved by treating species' utilization of this two-dimensional space as continuous, while also classifying species into categorical roles. Both approaches failed to detect the conservation of species' roles for a single species out of over 38 000 host and helminth parasite species. Together, our findings suggest that species' roles in host–helminth networks may not be conserved, pointing to the potential role of spatial and environmental gradients, as well as the importance of the context of the local host and helminth parasite community. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Infectious disease macroecology: parasite diversity and dynamics across the globe’.

Download Full-text

Interactions between species and the structure of helminth communities

Parasitology ◽

10.1017/s0031182000016991 ◽

2001 ◽

Vol 122 (S1) ◽

pp. S3-S11 ◽

Cited By ~ 149

Author(s):

R. POULIN

Keyword(s):

Species Interactions ◽

Interspecific Interactions ◽

Parasite Community ◽

Helminth Species ◽

Gastrointestinal Helminth ◽

Helminth Communities ◽

General Importance ◽

Random Patterns ◽

Case Basis

The role of interspecific interactions in the structure of gastrointestinal helminth communities has been at the core of most research in parasite community ecology, yet there is no consensus regarding their general importance. There have been two different approaches to the study of species interactions in helminths. The first one consists of measuring the responses of helminth species in concomitant infections, preferably in laboratory experiments. Any change in numbers of parasite individuals or in their use of niche space, compared with what is observed in single infections, provides solid evidence that the species are interacting. The second approach can only provide indirect, circumstantial evidence. It consists in contrasting observed patterns either in the distribution of species richness of infracommunities from wild hosts, in their species composition, or in pairwise associations between helminth species among infracommunities, with the random patterns predicted by appropriate null models. In many cases, observed patterns do not depart from predicted ones; when they do, alternative explanations are usually as plausible as invoking the effect of interactions among helminth species. The present evidence suggests that the role of species interactions in helminth community structure is often negligible, but that it must always be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Download Full-text