scholarly journals FKF1 and GIGANTEA Complex Formation Is Required for Day-Length Measurement in Arabidopsis

Science ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 318 (5848) ◽  
pp. 261-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sawa ◽  
D. A. Nusinow ◽  
S. A. Kay ◽  
T. Imaizumi
Keyword(s):  
Complex Formation ◽  
Length Measurement ◽  
Day Length

Comparative Labelling and Biokinetic Studies of 99mTc-EDTA(Sn) and 99mTc-DTPA(Sn)

1977 ◽  
Vol 16 (01) ◽  
pp. 30-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Agha ◽  
R. B. R. Persson
Keyword(s):  
Complex Formation ◽  
Significant Influence ◽  
Room Temperature ◽  
Ph Value ◽  
Maximum Activity ◽  
Reduction Step ◽  
Labelling Yield ◽  
Different Temperatures ◽  
Kinetics Of

SummaryGelchromatography column scanning has been used to study the fractions of 99mTc-pertechnetate, 99mTcchelate and reduced hydrolyzed 99mTc in preparations of 99mTc-EDTA(Sn) and 99mTc-DTPA(Sn). The labelling yield of 99mTc-EDTA(Sn) chelate was as high as 90—95% when 100 μmol EDTA · H4 and 0.5 (Amol SnCl2 was incubated with 10 ml 99mTceluate for 30—60 min at room temperature. The study of the influence of the pH-value on the fraction of 99mTc-EDTA shows that pH 2.8—2.9 gave the best labelling yield. In a comparative study of the labelling kinetics of 99mTc-EDTA(Sn) and 99mTc- DTPA(Sn) at different temperatures (7, 22 and 37°C), no significant influence on the reduction step was found. The rate constant for complex formation, however, increased more rapidly with increased temperature for 99mTc-DTPA(Sn). At room temperature only a few minutes was required to achieve a high labelling yield with 99mTc-DTPA(Sn) whereas about 60 min was required for 99mTc-EDTA(Sn). Comparative biokinetic studies in rabbits showed that the maximum activity in kidneys is achieved after 12 min with 99mTc-EDTA(Sn) but already after 6 min with 99mTc-DTPA(Sn). The long-term disappearance of 99mTc-DTPA(Sn) from the kidneys is about five times faster than that for 99mTc-EDTA(Sn).

Inactivation of α- and β-Thrombin by Antithrombin-III and Heparin

1976 ◽  
Vol 36 (03) ◽  
pp. 503-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymund Machovich ◽  
György Blaskó ◽  
Anna Borsodi
Keyword(s):  
Heat Treatment ◽  
Complex Formation ◽  
Blood Circulation ◽  
Antithrombin Iii

SummaryInactivation of α- and β-thrombin by antithrombin-III and heparin was studied, since it had been suggested that two forms of thrombin exist with respect to heparin sensitivity (Machovich 1975b).It was found that the inactivation rates of α- and β-thrombin by antithrombin were different, namely α-thrombin was more sensitive to antithrombin than β-thrombin. Heparin facilitated the complex formation between α-thrombin and antithrombin-III, whereas β-thrombin inactivation was only slightly affected.Furthermore, heparin protected α-thrombin against the inactivating effect of heat, while β-thrombin lost its activity during the heat treatment.These findings suggest that the formation of β-thrombin in blood circulation may have an important role in thrombosis predisposition.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document