Uncoupling of Leading- and Lagging-Strand DNA Replication During Lesion Bypass in Vivo

Science ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 300 (5623) ◽  
pp. 1300-1303 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Pages
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Lesion Bypass ◽  
Lagging Strand

scholarly journals Near-continuously synthesized leading strands inEscherichia coliare broken by ribonucleotide excision

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (4) ◽  
pp. 1251-1260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glen E. Cronan ◽  
Elena A. Kouzminova ◽  
Andrei Kuzminov
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Chromosomal Dna ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Okazaki Fragments ◽  
Leading Strand ◽  
Replication Intermediates ◽  
Lagging Strand

In vitro, purified replisomes drive model replication forks to synthesize continuous leading strands, even without ligase, supporting the semidiscontinuous model of DNA replication. However, nascent replication intermediates isolated from ligase-deficientEscherichia colicomprise only short (on average 1.2-kb) Okazaki fragments. It was long suspected that cells replicate their chromosomal DNA by the semidiscontinuous mode observed in vitro but that, in vivo, the nascent leading strand was artifactually fragmented postsynthesis by excision repair. Here, using high-resolution separation of pulse-labeled replication intermediates coupled with strand-specific hybridization, we show that excision-proficientE. coligenerates leading-strand intermediates >10-fold longer than lagging-strand Okazaki fragments. Inactivation of DNA-repair activities, including ribonucleotide excision, further increased nascent leading-strand size to ∼80 kb, while lagging-strand Okazaki fragments remained unaffected. We conclude that in vivo, repriming occurs ∼70× less frequently on the leading versus lagging strands, and that DNA replication inE. coliis effectively semidiscontinuous.

Prokaryotic DNA replication mechanisms

1987 ◽  
Vol 317 (1187) ◽  
pp. 395-420 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Kinetic Studies ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Gene 32 ◽  
Dna Template ◽  
Lagging Strand

The three different prokaryotic replication systems that have been most extensively studied use the same basic components for moving a DNA replication fork, even though the individual proteins are different and lack extensive amino acid sequence homology. In the T4 bacteriophage system, the components of the DNA replication complex can be grouped into functional classes as follows: DNA polymerase (gene 43 protein), helix-destabilizing protein (gene 32 protein), polymerase accessory proteins (gene 44/62 and 45 proteins), and primosome proteins (gene 41 DNA helicase and gene 61 RNA primase). DNA synthesis in the in vitro system starts by covalent addition onto the 3'OH end at a random nick on a double-stranded DNA template and proceeds to generate a replication fork that moves at about the in vivo rate, and with approximately the in vivo base-pairing fidelity. DNA is synthesized at the fork in a continuous fashion on the leading strand and in a discontinuous fashion on the lagging strand (generating short Okazaki fragments with 5'-linked pppApCpXpYpZ pentaribonucleotide primers). Kinetic studies reveal that the DNA polymerase molecule on the lagging strand stays associated with the fork as it moves. Therefore the DNA template on the lagging strand must be folded so that the stop site for the synthesis of one Okazaki fragment is adjacent to the start site for the next such fragment, allowing the polymerase and other replication proteins on the lagging strand to recycle.

scholarly journals SINE Retroposons Can Be Used In Vivo as Nucleation Centers for De Novo Methylation

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 3434-3441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Arnaud ◽  
Chantal Goubely ◽  
Thierry Pélissier ◽  
Jean-Marc Deragon
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Transposable Elements ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Genomic Sequencing ◽  
Methylated Dna ◽  
Short Interspersed Elements ◽  
Sequencing Technique ◽  
Lagging Strand ◽  
De Novo Methylation

ABSTRACT SINEs (short interspersed elements) are an abundant class of transposable elements found in a wide variety of eukaryotes. Using the genomic sequencing technique, we observed that plant S1 SINE retroposons mainly integrate in hypomethylated DNA regions and are targeted by methylases. Methylation can then spread from the SINE into flanking genomic sequences, creating distal epigenetic modifications. This methylation spreading is vectorially directed upstream or downstream of the S1 element, suggesting that it could be facilitated when a potentially good methylatable sequence is single stranded during DNA replication, particularly when located on the lagging strand. Replication of a short methylated DNA region could thus lead to the de novo methylation of upstream or downstream adjacent sequences.

scholarly journals Limiting DNA polymerase delta alters replication dynamics and leads to a dependence on checkpoint activation and recombination-mediated DNA repair

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha C Koussa ◽  
Duncan J. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Dna Polymerase Delta ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
A Genome ◽  
Synthesis And Processing ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Lagging Strand

ABSTRACTDNA polymerase delta (Pol δ) plays several essential roles in eukaryotic DNA replication and repair. At the replication fork, Pol δ is responsible for the synthesis and processing of the lagging-strand. At replication origins, Pol δ has been proposed to initiate leading-strand synthesis by extending the first Okazaki fragment. Destabilizing mutations in human Pol δ subunits cause replication stress and syndromic immunodeficiency. Analogously, reduced levels of Pol δ in Saccharomyces cerevisiae lead to pervasive genome instability. Here, we analyze how the depletion of Pol δ impacts replication origin firing and lagging-strand synthesis during replication elongation in vivo in S. cerevisiae. By analyzing nascent lagging-strand products, we observe a genome-wide change in both the establishment and progression of replication. S-phase progression is slowed in Pol δ depletion, with both globally reduced origin firing and slower replication progression. We find that no polymerase other than Pol δ is capable of synthesizing a substantial amount of lagging-strand DNA, even when Pol δ is severely limiting. We also characterize the impact of impaired lagging-strand synthesis on genome integrity and find increased ssDNA and DNA damage when Pol δ is limiting; these defects lead to a strict dependence on checkpoint signaling and resection-mediated repair pathways for cellular viability.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTDNA replication in eukaryotes is carried out by the replisome – a multi-subunit complex comprising the enzymatic activities required to generate two intact daughter DNA strands. DNA polymerase delta (Pol δ) is a multi-functional replisome enzyme responsible for synthesis and processing of the lagging-strand. Mutations in Pol δ cause a variety of human diseases: for example, destabilizing mutations lead to immunodeficiency. We titrate the concentration of Pol δ in budding yeast – a simple model eukaryote with conserved DNA replication machinery. We characterize several replication defects associated with Pol δ scarcity. The defects we observe provide insight into how destabilizing Pol δ mutations lead to genome instability.

Discontinuous leading-strand synthesis: a stop–start story

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph T.P. Yeeles
Keyword(s):  
Model Organisms ◽  
Replication Proteins ◽  
Lesion Bypass ◽  
Exogenous Dna ◽  
Dna Lesion ◽  
Dna Damaging Agents ◽  
Leading Strand ◽  
Lagging Strand

Reconstitution experiments using replication proteins from a number of different model organisms have firmly established that, in vitro, DNA replication is semi-discontinuous: continuous on the leading strand and discontinuous on the lagging strand. The mechanism by which DNA is replicated in vivo is less clear. In fact, there have been many observations of discontinuous replication in the absence of exogenous DNA-damaging agents. It has also been proposed that replication is discontinuous on the leading strand at least in part because of DNA lesion bypass. Several recent studies have revealed mechanistic details of pathways where replication of the leading strand introduces discontinuities. These mechanisms and their potential contributions to observations of discontinuous replication in vivo will be discussed.

scholarly journals The GAN Exonuclease or the Flap Endonuclease Fen1 and RNase HII Are Necessary for Viability of Thermococcus kodakarensis

2017 ◽  
Vol 199 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett W. Burkhart ◽  
Lubomira Cubonova ◽  
Margaret R. Heider ◽  
Zvi Kelman ◽  
John N. Reeve ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Okazaki Fragment ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Thermococcus Kodakarensis ◽  
Okazaki Fragments ◽  
Domains Of Life ◽  
Okazaki Fragment Maturation ◽  
Polymerase I ◽  
Lagging Strand

ABSTRACT Many aspects of and factors required for DNA replication are conserved across all three domains of life, but there are some significant differences surrounding lagging-strand synthesis. In Archaea, a 5′-to-3′ exonuclease, related to both bacterial RecJ and eukaryotic Cdc45, that associates with the replisome specifically through interactions with GINS was identified and designated GAN (for GINS-associated nuclease). Despite the presence of a well-characterized flap endonuclease (Fen1), it was hypothesized that GAN might participate in primer removal during Okazaki fragment maturation, and as a Cdc45 homologue, GAN might also be a structural component of an archaeal CMG (Cdc45, MCM, and GINS) replication complex. We demonstrate here that, individually, either Fen1 or GAN can be deleted, with no discernible effects on viability and growth. However, deletion of both Fen1 and GAN was not possible, consistent with both enzymes catalyzing the same step in primer removal from Okazaki fragments in vivo. RNase HII has also been proposed to participate in primer processing during Okazaki fragment maturation. Strains with both Fen1 and RNase HII deleted grew well. GAN activity is therefore sufficient for viability in the absence of both RNase HII and Fen1, but it was not possible to construct a strain with both RNase HII and GAN deleted. Fen1 alone is therefore insufficient for viability in the absence of both RNase HII and GAN. The ability to delete GAN demonstrates that GAN is not required for the activation or stability of the archaeal MCM replicative helicase. IMPORTANCE The mechanisms used to remove primer sequences from Okazaki fragments during lagging-strand DNA replication differ in the biological domains. Bacteria use the exonuclease activity of DNA polymerase I, whereas eukaryotes and archaea encode a flap endonuclease (Fen1) that cleaves displaced primer sequences. RNase HII and the GINS-associated exonuclease GAN have also been hypothesized to assist in primer removal in Archaea. Here we demonstrate that in Thermococcus kodakarensis, either Fen1 or GAN activity is sufficient for viability. Furthermore, GAN can support growth in the absence of both Fen1 and RNase HII, but Fen1 and RNase HII are required for viability in the absence of GAN.

scholarly journals High-accuracy lagging-strand DNA replication mediated by DNA polymerase dissociation

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (16) ◽  
pp. 4212-4217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarzyna H. Maslowska ◽  
Karolina Makiela-Dzbenska ◽  
Jin-Yao Mo ◽  
Iwona J. Fijalkowska ◽  
Roel M. Schaaper
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Critical Factor ◽  
Chromosomal Dna ◽  
Experimental Systems ◽  
Dna Strands ◽  
Pol Iii ◽  
Error Removal ◽  
Lagging Strand

The fidelity of DNA replication is a critical factor in the rate at which cells incur mutations. Due to the antiparallel orientation of the two chromosomal DNA strands, one strand (leading strand) is replicated in a mostly processive manner, while the other (lagging strand) is synthesized in short sections called Okazaki fragments. A fundamental question that remains to be answered is whether the two strands are copied with the same intrinsic fidelity. In most experimental systems, this question is difficult to answer, as the replication complex contains a different DNA polymerase for each strand, such as, for example, DNA polymerases δ and ε in eukaryotes. Here we have investigated this question in the bacterium Escherichia coli, in which the replicase (DNA polymerase III holoenzyme) contains two copies of the same polymerase (Pol III, the dnaE gene product), and hence the two strands are copied by the same polymerase. Our in vivo mutagenesis data indicate that the two DNA strands are not copied with the same accuracy, and that, remarkably, the lagging strand has the highest fidelity. We postulate that this effect results from the greater dissociative character of the lagging-strand polymerase, which provides additional options for error removal. Our conclusion is strongly supported by results with dnaE antimutator polymerases characterized by increased dissociation rates.

scholarly journals 3′ → 5′ Exonucleases of DNA Polymerases ϵ and δ Correct Base Analog Induced DNA Replication Errors on Opposite DNA Strands in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 142 (3) ◽  
pp. 717-726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Polina V Shcherbakova ◽  
Youri I Pavlov
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Polymerases ◽  
Replication Errors ◽  
Dna Strands ◽  
Base Analog ◽  
Chromosome Iii ◽  
Dna Strand ◽  
Dna Replication Errors ◽  
Yeast Mutants ◽  
Lagging Strand

Abstract The base analog 6-N-hydroxylaminopurine (HAP) induces bidirectional GC → AT and AT → GC transitions that are enhanced in DNA polymerase ϵ and δ 3′ → 5′ exonuclease-deficient yeast mutants, pol2-4 and pol3-01, respectively. We have constructed a set of isogenic strains to determine whether the DNA polymerases δ and ϵ contribute equally to proofreading of replication errors provoked by HAP during leading and lagging strand DNA synthesis. Site-specific GC → AT and AT → GC transitions in a Pol→, pol2-4 or pol3-01 genetic background were scored as reversions of ura3 missense alleles. At each site, reversion was increased in only one proofreading-deficient mutant, either pol2-4 or pol3-01, depending on the DNA strand in which HAP incorporation presumably occurred. Measurement of the HAP-induced reversion frequency of the ura3 alleles placed into chromosome III near to the defined active replication origin ARS306 in two orientations indicated that DNA polymerases ϵ and δ correct HAP-induced DNA replication errors on opposite DNA strands.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document