scholarly journals Dramatic performance ofClostridium thermocellumexplained by its wide range of cellulase modalities

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. e1501254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi Xu ◽  
Michael G. Resch ◽  
Kara Podkaminer ◽  
Shihui Yang ◽  
John O. Baker ◽  
...  

Clostridium thermocellumis the most efficient microorganism for solubilizing lignocellulosic biomass known to date. Its high cellulose digestion capability is attributed to efficient cellulases consisting of both a free-enzyme system and a tethered cellulosomal system wherein carbohydrate active enzymes (CAZymes) are organized by primary and secondary scaffoldin proteins to generate large protein complexes attached to the bacterial cell wall. This study demonstrates thatC. thermocellumalso uses a type of cellulosomal system not bound to the bacterial cell wall, called the “cell-free” cellulosomal system. The cell-free cellulosome complex can be seen as a “long range cellulosome” because it can diffuse away from the cell and degrade polysaccharide substrates remotely from the bacterial cell. The contribution of these two types of cellulosomal systems inC. thermocellumwas elucidated by characterization of mutants with different combinations of scaffoldin gene deletions. The primary scaffoldin, CipA, was found to play the most important role in cellulose degradation byC. thermocellum, whereas the secondary scaffoldins have less important roles. Additionally, the distinct and efficient mode of action of theC. thermocellumexoproteome, wherein the cellulosomes splay or divide biomass particles, changes when either the primary or secondary scaffolds are removed, showing that the intact wild-type cellulosomal system is necessary for this essential mode of action. This new transcriptional and proteomic evidence shows that a functional primary scaffoldin plays a more important role compared to secondary scaffoldins in the proper regulation of CAZyme genes, cellodextrin transport, and other cellular functions.

MedChemComm ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osamu Yoshida ◽  
Jun Nakamura ◽  
Hidenori Yamashiro ◽  
Kenji Miura ◽  
Sayaka Hayashi ◽  
...  

1979 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 995-1001 ◽  
Author(s):  
PRISKA SPIRI-NAKAGAWA ◽  
YOSHITAKE TANAKA ◽  
RUIKO OIWA ◽  
HARUO TANAKA ◽  
SATOSHI OMURA

1967 ◽  
Vol 167 (1009) ◽  
pp. 446-447 ◽  

Although we have heard a lot about the mode of binding of low molecular weight, soluble, lysozyme substrates, we have heard little about the mode of action of lysozyme on its natural insoluble substrate, the bacterial cell wall; so I want to bring a biological flavour into this discussion. Lysozyme was the name given by Fleming (1922) to the powerful bacteriolytic agent found in various cells and secretions; it was particularly active against a new bacterial species which he named Micrococcus lysodeikticus . The walls of this species still provide us with one of the best substrates for the study of lysozyme action. Salton showed that there is a considerable spectrum of activity of lysozyme in solubilizing walls of other species of bacteria. For example, walls of M. lysodeikticus are attacked rapidly by a concentration of enzyme of 1 μg/ml., Bacillus megaterium walls need 50 μg/ml., while walls of B. cereus are hardly changed visibly by 50 μg/ml. Consideration of the structure of the basal mucopeptide unit of bacterial cell walls, illustrated by Dr Perkins, shows that there are many ways in which structural differences could be introduced. Knowledge of the effects of some of these differences on lysozyme sensitivity may help in elucidating the mode of action of lysozyme on the complete bacterial cell wall.


2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 209-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bénédicte Flambard

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document