International Union of Pharmacology. LXV. The Pharmacology and Classification of the Nuclear Receptor Superfamily: Glucocorticoid, Mineralocorticoid, Progesterone, and Androgen Receptors

2006 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 782-797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick Z. Lu ◽  
Suzanne E. Wardell ◽  
Kerry L. Burnstein ◽  
Donald Defranco ◽  
Peter J. Fuller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Androgen Receptors ◽  
International Union ◽  
Nuclear Receptor Superfamily

International Union of Pharmacology. LIX. The Pharmacology and Classification of the Nuclear Receptor Superfamily: Thyroid Hormone Receptors

2006 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 705-711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frédéric Flamant ◽  
John D. Baxter ◽  
Douglas Forrest ◽  
Samuel Refetoff ◽  
Herbert Samuels ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Hormone ◽  
Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Thyroid Hormone Receptors ◽  
International Union ◽  
Nuclear Receptor Superfamily

scholarly journals Estrogen-related Receptor β (ERRβ) – Renaissance Receptor or Receptor Renaissance?

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. nrs.14002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shailaja D. Divekar ◽  
Deanna M. Tiek ◽  
Aileen Fernandez ◽  
Rebecca B. Riggins
Keyword(s):  
Alternative Splicing ◽  
Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Structure And Function ◽  
The Other ◽  
Orphan Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Nuclear Receptor Superfamily ◽  
And Function ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Estrogen Related Receptor

Estrogen-related receptors (ERRs) are founding members of the orphan nuclear receptor (ONR) subgroup of the nuclear receptor superfamily. Twenty-seven years of study have yet to identify cognate ligands for the ERRs, though they have firmly placed ERRα (ESRRA) and ERRγ (ESRRG) at the intersection of cellular metabolism and oncogenesis. The pace of discovery for novel functions of ERRβ (ESRRB), however, has until recently been somewhat slower than that of its family members. ERRβ has also been largely ignored in summaries and perspectives of the ONR literature. Here, we provide an overview of established and emerging knowledge of ERRβ in mouse, man, and other species, highlighting unique aspects of ERRβ biology that set it apart from the other two estrogen-related receptors, with a focus on the impact of alternative splicing on the structure and function of this receptor.

scholarly journals Positive and Negative Regulation of Chicken Anemia Virus Transcription

2005 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. 2859-2868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myrna M. Miller ◽  
Keith W. Jarosinski ◽  
Karel A. Schat
Keyword(s):  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Protein Translation ◽  
Chicken Anemia Virus ◽  
Egfp Expression ◽  
Start Site ◽  
Response Element ◽  
Nuclear Receptor Superfamily ◽  
Promoter Construct ◽  
Anemia Virus

ABSTRACT Chicken anemia virus (CAV) is a small circular single-stranded DNA virus with a single promoter-enhancer region containing four consensus cyclic AMP response element sequences (AGCTCA), which are similar to the estrogen response element (ERE) consensus half-sites (A)GGTCA. These sequences are arranged as direct repeats, an arrangement that can be recognized by members of the nuclear receptor superfamily. Transient-transfection assays which use a short CAV promoter construct that ended at the transcription start site and drive expression of enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) showed high basal activity in DF-1, LMH, LMH/2A, and primary theca and granulosa cells. The estrogen receptor-enhanced cell line, LMH/2A, had significantly greater expression than LMH cells, and this expression was significantly increased with estrogen treatment. A long promoter construct which included GGTCA-like sequences downstream of the first CAV protein translation start site was found to have significantly less EGFP expression in DF-1 cells than the short promoter, which was largely due to decreased RNA transcription. DNA-protein binding assays indicated that proteins recognizing a consensus ERE palindrome also bind GGTCA-like sequences in the CAV promoter. Estrogen receptor and other members of the nuclear receptor superfamily may provide a mechanism to regulate CAV activity in situations of low virus copy number.

scholarly journals Structure and Function of the Nuclear Receptor Superfamily and Current Targeted Therapies of Prostate Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baylee A. Porter ◽  
Maria A. Ortiz ◽  
Gennady Bratslavsky ◽  
Leszek Kotula
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Cell Permeability ◽  
Cancer Therapies ◽  
Functional Difference ◽  
Nuclear Receptor Superfamily ◽  
Functional Regulation ◽  
And Function

The nuclear receptor superfamily comprises a large group of proteins with functions essential for cell signaling, survival, and proliferation. There are multiple distinctions between nuclear superfamily classes defined by hallmark differences in function, ligand binding, tissue specificity, and DNA binding. In this review, we utilize the initial classification system, which defines subfamilies based on structure and functional difference. The defining feature of the nuclear receptor superfamily is that these proteins function as transcription factors. The loss of transcriptional regulation or gain of functioning of these receptors is a hallmark in numerous diseases. For example, in prostate cancer, the androgen receptor is a primary target for current prostate cancer therapies. Targeted cancer therapies for nuclear hormone receptors have been more feasible to develop than others due to the ligand availability and cell permeability of hormones. To better target these receptors, it is critical to understand their structural and functional regulation. Given that late-stage cancers often develop hormone insensitivity, we will explore the strengths and pitfalls of targeting other transcription factors outside of the nuclear receptor superfamily such as the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT).

scholarly journals Identification, classification, and interpretation of boninites from Anthropocene to Eoarchean using Si-Mg-Ti systematics

Geosphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 1008-1037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian A. Pearce ◽  
Mark K. Reagan
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Plumes ◽  
International Union ◽  
Subduction Initiation ◽  
Depleted Mantle ◽  
Tectonic Significance ◽  
Mariana Arc ◽  
Geologic Record ◽  
Geological Sciences ◽  
Subduction Component

Abstract Boninites are rare, high-Si, high-Mg, low-Ti lavas that have considerable tectonic significance, especially for recognizing and interpreting episodes of subduction initiation in the geologic record. Formal identification and classification of boninites may be carried out using MgO-SiO2 and MgO-TiO2 diagrams to find compositions that satisfy modified International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) criteria of Si8 > 52 and Ti8 < 0.5, where Si8 and Ti8 refer to concentrations of the oxides at 8 wt% MgO. However, screening of highly metasomatized rocks and accurate classification require precautions, including normalization to a 100% volatile-free basis. The MgO-SiO2 diagram can also be used for subdivision into low-Si boninites (Si8 < 57) and high-Si boninites (Si8 > 57). Satisfying one but not both of the boninite criteria are rocks with Si8 > 52 but Ti8 ≥ 0.5 (siliceous high-magnesium basalts) and rocks with Si8 ≤ 52 but Ti8 < 0.5 (low-Ti basalts). We tested the classification methodologies using ∼100 low-Ti lava suites dating from the present-day back to the Eoarchean. We conclude that, of those classifying as “boninite series,” Izu-Bonin-Mariana arc–type subduction initiation terranes provide the dominant setting only back as far as ca. 2 Ga, which marks the maximum age of extensive clinopyroxene-undersaturated melting and eruption of high-Si boninites. From 2 to 3 Ga, most boninites formed in intraplate settings by melting of refertilized, depleted cratonic roots. Prior to 3 Ga, hot, depleted mantle plumes provided the main boninite sources. Nonetheless, arc-basin boninites, though rare, do extend back to 3.8 Ga, and, together with the inherited subduction component in intracratonic boninites, they provide evidence for some form of subduction during the Archean.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document