Project Adventure: The Obstacle Course Experience

1979 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 6-9
Author(s):  
Robert A. Bowlsby
2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara C. Storandt ◽  
Lia C. Dossin ◽  
Anna Piacentini Lacher

Research conducted in various settings suggests that preparation and support for online instructors should be considered separately from efforts to prepare face-to-face instructors. However, very few studies outline the ways in which preparation to teach online should differ, and only a handful link these practices to measurable outcomes that help define what is meant by effective. PBS TeacherLine’s professional development model presents an opportunity to examine a comprehensive, well-established effort that has undergone regular refinements over the past 11 years. Results from the yearlong study presented in this paper showed that PBS TeacherLine’s professional development model contributes positively to instructor satisfaction, retention, high quality online instruction, increased instructor reflection, and learner outcomes such as an overall positive course experience. These findings reveal promising best practices for online faculty professional development that are specific to the online environment.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil P. Kelley ◽  
◽  
Rodney Blackwell ◽  
Aniya Bryant ◽  
Amaris Daniels ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Kaushal Kumar Bhagat ◽  
Chia-Hui Cheng ◽  
Indira Koneru ◽  
Fong Soon Fook ◽  
Chun-Yen Chang

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adi Irfan Che Ani ◽  
Norngainy Mohd Tawil ◽  
Suhana Johar ◽  
Khaidzir Ismail ◽  
Mohd Zulhanif Abd Razak

1999 ◽  
Vol 2 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 171-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique Monolescu ◽  
Catherine Schifter

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-60
Author(s):  
Kateřina Juklová ◽  
Stanislav Michek ◽  
Petr Soukup ◽  
Jindra Vondroušová ◽  
Daniela Vrabcová

Cílem příspěvku je seznámit s průběhem a výsledky validace a adaptace dotazníku CEQ (Course Experience Questionnaire) a diskutovat jeho využitelnost v aktuálních podmínkách českých vysokých škol. Originální verze dotazníku vznikla na základě intenzivních výzkumů učení studentů koncem 80. let v Austrálii a v současné době je jedním z celosvětově nejužívanějších nástrojů pro hodnocení kvality výuky studentem v terciárním vzdělávání. Vzhledem k aktuální potřebě českých vysokých škol realizovat autoevaluační procesy s použitím validních a spolehlivých nástrojů považujeme ověření psychometrických vlastností dotazníku a jeho adaptaci za jedno z možných řešení. V úvodní části textu je nastíněn kontext a okolnosti vzniku australského originálu včetně teoretických koncepcí, které se staly jeho základem. Proces adaptace a validace byl realizován na Pedagogické fakultě Univerzity Hradec Králové (PdF UHK) a proběhl ve dvou fázích kombinujících kvalitativní a kvantitativní přístup. V prvním kroku proběhla ohnisková skupina se studenty s cílem  ověřit soulad mezi pojetím kvality výuky u českých studentů a zaměřením dotazníku. Následně byl přeložený dotazník administrován 661 studentům učitelství z PdF UHK a ověřován z hlediska konstruktové a kriteriální validity a reliability. Analýzy potvrdily originální pětifaktorovou strukturu dotazníku a uspokojivou vnitřní konzistenci všech škál. Výsledky jsou diskutovány a vztaženy ke zjištění zahraničních autorů i ke kontextu příležitostí a omezení pro používání v českém prostředí. V závěru je upozorněno na limity studie a jsou naznačeny další možné směry úprav.


Author(s):  
Traian Ropot ◽  
◽  
Muhua Wang ◽  
Francis Stonier ◽  
◽  
...  

The intent of this paper is to analyse the correlation between student engagement and course experience as a mechanism for improvement of the quality of undergraduate education. Traditionally, research focused separately on student engagement or course experience but it is to be argued that the later can be perceived as a mediating variable onto assessing student engagement as a tool for measurement and improvement of the undergraduate education. Additionally, is to be argued that the critique upon the student engagement and course experience concepts contributes to their further development.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Means ◽  
Julie Neisler

This report describes the experiences of over 600 undergraduates who were taking STEM courses with in-person class meetings that had to shift to remote instruction in spring 2020 because of COVID-19. Internet connectivity issues were serious enough to interfere with students’ ability to attend or participate in their STEM course at least occasionally for 46% of students, with 15% of students experiencing such problems often or very often. A large majority of survey respondents reported some difficulty with staying motivated to work on their STEM courses after they moved online, with 45% characterizing motivation as a major problem. A majority of STEM students also reported having problems knowing where to get help with the course content after it went online, finding a quiet place to work on the course, and fitting the course in with other family or home responsibilities. Overall, students who reported experiencing a greater number of major challenges with continuing their course after it went online expressed lower levels of satisfaction with their course after COVID-19. An exception to this general pattern, though, was found for students from minoritized race/ethnicity groups, females, and lower-income students. Despite experiencing more challenges than other students did with respect to continuing their STEM courses remotely, these students were more likely to rate the quality of their experiences when their STEM course was online as just as good as, or even better than, when the course was meeting in person.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document