Excess Pressure Drops in Entrance Flows

1982 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. S. Vrentas ◽  
J. L. Duda ◽  
Seong‐Ahn Hong
1997 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomiichi Hasegawa ◽  
Masaki Suganuma ◽  
Hiroshi Watanabe

2016 ◽  
Vol 230 ◽  
pp. 43-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.R. Tamaddon-Jahromi ◽  
I.E. Garduño ◽  
J.E. López-Aguilar ◽  
M.F. Webster

Author(s):  
Vladislav Sh. Shagapov ◽  
Ismagilyan G. Khusainov ◽  
Emiliya V. Galiakbarova ◽  
Zulfya R. Khakimova

This article studies the process of relaxation of the pressure in a tank with the damaged area of the wall after pressure-testing. The authors use different methods for the diagnosis of the technical condition of objects of petroleum products storage. Pressure testing is one of nondestructive methods. The rate of pressure decrease is characteristic of the system tightness. This article studies the cases of ground and underground location of the tank. Pressure testing involves excess pressure inside of a tank and observing its decrease. Over time, one can assess the integrity of the system. This has required creating mathematical models to account the filtration of the liquid depending on the location of the tank. The results include the analytical solution of the task and the formulas for describing the dependence of the relaxation time of pressure in the tank from the liquid and soil parameters, geometry of the tank, and the damaged portion of the wall. The two- and three-dimensional cases of liquids filtration for the case of underground location of the tank were considered. The results of some numerical calculations of the dependence of reduction time and the time of half-life pressure from the area of the damaged portion of the wall were shown. The obtained solutions allow assessing the extent of the damaged area by the pressure testing with known values of tank, liquid, and soil.


2004 ◽  
Vol 126 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. G. Elliott ◽  
R. Kurz ◽  
C. Etheridge ◽  
J. P. O’Connell

Industrial Gas Turbines allow operation with a wide variety of gaseous and liquid fuels. To determine the suitability for operation with a gas fuel system, various physical parameters of the proposed fuel need to be determined: heating value, dew point, Joule-Thompson coefficient, Wobbe Index, and others. This paper describes an approach to provide a consistent treatment for determining the above physical properties. Special focus is given to the problem of determining the dew point of the potential fuel gas at various pressure levels. A dew point calculation using appropriate equations of state is described, and results are presented. In particular the treatment of heavier hydrocarbons, and water is addressed and recommendations about the necessary data input are made. Since any fuel gas system causes pressure drops in the fuel gas, the temperature reduction due to the Joule-Thompson effect has to be considered and quantified. Suggestions about how to approach fuel suitability questions during the project development and construction phase, as well as in operation are made.


1999 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 1541-1548 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. A. Holt ◽  
R. V. Baker ◽  
S. E. Hughs

Author(s):  
Fabricio S. Silva ◽  
Ricardo A. Medronho ◽  
Luiz Fernando Barca

Oil production facilities have choke/control valves to control production and protect downstream equipment against over pressurization. This process is responsible for droplets break up and the formation of emulsions which are difficult to treat. An experimental study of water in oil dispersion droplets break up in localized pressure drop is presented. To accomplish that, an apparatus simulating a gate valve was constructed. Droplet Size Distribution (DSD) was measured by laser light scattering. Oil physical properties were controlled and three different break up models were compared with the experimental results. All experimental maximum diameters (dmax) were above Kolmogorov length scale. The results show that dmax decreases with increase of energy dissipation rate (ε) according to the relation dmax ∝ ε−0.42. The Hinze (1955, AIChE J.1, 3, 289–295) model failed to predict the experimental results, although, it was able to adjust reasonably well those points when the original proportional constant was changed. It was observed that increasing the dispersed phase concentration increases dmax due to turbulence suppression and/or coalescence phenomenon. Turbulent viscous break up model gave fairly good prediction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document