Bats use predictive strategies to track moving auditory objects

2021 ◽  
Vol 150 (4) ◽  
pp. A106-A106
Author(s):  
Angeles Salles ◽  
Clarice Diebold ◽  
Cynthia F. Moss
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Objects

Preattentive representation of feature conjunctions for concurrent spatially distributed auditory objects

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rika Takegata ◽  
Elvira Brattico ◽  
Mari Tervaniemi ◽  
Olga Varyagina ◽  
Risto Näätänen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spatially Distributed ◽  
Auditory Objects

Developmental changes in distinguishing concurrent auditory objects

2003 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claude Alain ◽  
Eef L. Theunissen ◽  
Hélène Chevalier ◽  
Magali Batty ◽  
Margot J. Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Developmental Changes ◽  
Auditory Objects

scholarly journals Selectively attending to auditory objects

10.2741/a505 ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. d202-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claude Alain
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Objects

Acoustic Features of Rhesus Vocalizations and Their Representation in the Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex

2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 1470-1484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yale E. Cohen ◽  
Frédéric Theunissen ◽  
Brian E. Russ ◽  
Patrick Gill
Keyword(s):  
Prefrontal Cortex ◽  
Acoustic Properties ◽  
Acoustic Features ◽  
Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex ◽  
Communication Signals ◽  
First Order ◽  
Natural Stimuli ◽  
Spectrotemporal Receptive Field ◽  
Auditory Objects

Communication is one of the fundamental components of both human and nonhuman animal behavior. Auditory communication signals (i.e., vocalizations) are especially important in the socioecology of several species of nonhuman primates such as rhesus monkeys. In rhesus, the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vPFC) is thought to be part of a circuit involved in representing vocalizations and other auditory objects. To further our understanding of the role of the vPFC in processing vocalizations, we characterized the spectrotemporal features of rhesus vocalizations, compared these features with other classes of natural stimuli, and then related the rhesus-vocalization acoustic features to neural activity. We found that the range of these spectrotemporal features was similar to that found in other ensembles of natural stimuli, including human speech, and identified the subspace of these features that would be particularly informative to discriminate between different vocalizations. In a first neural study, however, we found that the tuning properties of vPFC neurons did not emphasize these particularly informative spectrotemporal features. In a second neural study, we found that a first-order linear model (the spectrotemporal receptive field) is not a good predictor of vPFC activity. The results of these two neural studies are consistent with the hypothesis that the vPFC is not involved in coding the first-order acoustic properties of a stimulus but is involved in processing the higher-order information needed to form representations of auditory objects.

scholarly journals Neuronal populations and single cells representing learned auditory objects

Nature ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 424 (6949) ◽  
pp. 669-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Q. Gentner ◽  
Daniel Margoliash
Keyword(s):  
Single Cells ◽  
Neuronal Populations ◽  
Auditory Objects

scholarly journals On the Emergence and Awareness of Auditory Objects

PLoS Biology ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. e155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shihab Shamma
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Objects

Auditory objects of attention

1998 ◽  
Vol 103 (5) ◽  
pp. 2928-2928
Author(s):  
C. J. Darwin ◽  
R. W. Hukin
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Objects

scholarly journals A cognitive framework for the categorisation of auditory objects in urban soundscapes

2017 ◽  
Vol 121 ◽  
pp. 56-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Woodcock ◽  
W.J. Davies ◽  
T.J. Cox
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Framework ◽  
Auditory Objects
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document