Near to far field relationship of crackle-related events in military aircraft jet noise

2020 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. 2617-2617
Author(s):  
Aaron B. Vaughn ◽  
Kent L. Gee ◽  
Kevin M. Leete ◽  
J. M. Downing
Keyword(s):  
Jet Noise ◽  
Far Field ◽  
Military Aircraft ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
Field Relationship

scholarly journals Near to far field correlation of crackle-related events in military aircraft jet noise

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron B. Vaughn ◽  
Kent L. Gee ◽  
Kevin M. Leete ◽  
J. Micah Downing
Keyword(s):  
Jet Noise ◽  
Far Field ◽  
Military Aircraft ◽  
Field Correlation

scholarly journals Jet-Surface Interaction Test: Far-Field Noise Results

2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Clifford A. Brown
Keyword(s):  
High Speed ◽  
Radial Distance ◽  
Jet Noise ◽  
Surface Interaction ◽  
Shielding Effect ◽  
Noise Prediction ◽  
Far Field ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Field Noise ◽  
Surface Length

Many configurations proposed for the next generation of aircraft rely on the wing or other aircraft surfaces to shield the engine noise from the observers on the ground. However, the ability to predict the shielding effect and any new noise sources that arise from the high-speed jet flow interacting with a hard surface is currently limited. Furthermore, quality experimental data from jets with surfaces nearby suitable for developing and validating noise prediction methods are usually tied to a particular vehicle concept and, therefore, very complicated. The Jet-Surface Interaction Tests are intended to supply a high quality set of data covering a wide range of surface geometries and positions and jet flows to researchers developing aircraft noise prediction tools. The initial goal is to measure the noise of a jet near a simple planar surface while varying the surface length and location in order to: (1) validate noise prediction schemes when the surface is acting only as a jet noise shield and when the jet-surface interaction is creating additional noise, and (2) determine regions of interest for future, more detailed, tests. To meet these objectives, a flat plate was mounted on a two-axis traverse in two distinct configurations: (1) as a shield between the jet and the observer and (2) as a reflecting surface on the opposite side of the jet from the observer. The surface length was varied between 2 and 20 jet diameters downstream of the nozzle exit. Similarly, the radial distance from the jet centerline to the surface face was varied between 1 and 16 jet diameters. Far-field and phased array noise data were acquired at each combination of surface length and radial location using two nozzles operating at jet exit conditions across several flow regimes: subsonic cold, subsonic hot, underexpanded, ideally expanded, and overexpanded supersonic. The far-field noise results, discussed here, show where the jet noise is partially shielded by the surface and where jet-surface interaction noise dominates the low frequency spectrum as a surface extends downstream and approaches the jet plume.

scholarly journals Jet-Surface Interaction Test: Phased Array Noise Source Localization Results

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary G. Podboy
Keyword(s):  
Source Localization ◽  
Phased Array ◽  
Noise Source ◽  
Jet Noise ◽  
Companion Paper ◽  
Far Field ◽  
Sound Waves ◽  
Axial Distribution ◽  
Noise Sources ◽  
Interaction Test

An experiment was conducted to investigate the effect that a planar surface located near a jet flow has on the noise radiated to the far-field. Two different configurations were tested: 1) a shielding configuration in which the surface was located between the jet and the far-field microphones, and 2) a reflecting configuration in which the surface was mounted on the opposite side of the jet, and thus the jet noise was free to reflect off the surface toward the microphones. Both conventional far-field microphone and phased array noise source localization measurements were obtained. This paper discusses phased array results, while a companion paper discusses far-field results. The phased array data show that the axial distribution of noise sources in a jet can vary greatly depending on the jet operating condition and suggests that it would first be necessary to know or be able to predict this distribution in order to be able to predict the amount of noise reduction to expect from a given shielding configuration. The data obtained on both subsonic and supersonic jets show that the noise sources associated with a given frequency of noise tend to move downstream, and therefore, would become more difficult to shield, as jet Mach number increases. The noise source localization data obtained on cold, shock-containing jets suggests that the constructive interference of sound waves that produces noise at a given frequency within a broadband shock noise hump comes primarily from a small number of shocks, rather than from all the shocks at the same time. The reflecting configuration data illustrates that the law of reflection must be satisfied in order for jet noise to reflect off of a surface to an observer, and depending on the relative locations of the jet, the surface, and the observer, only some of the jet noise sources may satisfy this requirement.

Simultaneous Noise and Performance Measurements for High-Speed Jet Noise Reduction Technologies

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean Long ◽  
Steven Martens
Keyword(s):  
Noise Reduction ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Near Field ◽  
Jet Noise ◽  
Source Distribution ◽  
Test Facility ◽  
Wave Radiation ◽  
Far Field ◽  
Shock Cell ◽  
Field Noise

Model scale tests are conducted to assess the Noise/Performance trade for high speed jet noise reduction technologies. It is demonstrated that measuring the near field acoustic signature with a microphone array can be used to assess the far field noise using a procedure known as acoustic holography. The near field noise measurement is mathematically propagated producing an estimate of the noise level at the new location. Outward propagation produces an estimate of the far field noise. Propagation toward the jet axis produces the source distribution. Tests are conducted on convergent/divergent nozzles with three different area ratios, and several different chevron geometries. Noise is characterized by two independent processes: Shock cell noise radiating in the forward quadrant is produced when the nozzle is operated at non-ideally expanded conditions. Mach wave radiation propagates into the aft quadrant when the exhaust temperature is elevated. These results show good agreement with actual far field measurements from tests in the GE Cell 41 Acoustic Test Facility. Simultaneous performance measurement shows the change in thrust coefficient for different test conditions and configurations. Chevrons attached to the nozzle exit can reduce the noise by several dB at the expense of a minimal thrust loss.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document