Bias error analysis for phase and amplitude gradient estimation of acoustic intensity and specific acoustic impedance

2017 ◽  
Vol 142 (4) ◽  
pp. 2208-2218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric B. Whiting ◽  
Joseph S. Lawrence ◽  
Kent L. Gee ◽  
Tracianne B. Neilsen ◽  
Scott D. Sommerfeldt
2017 ◽  
Vol 141 (5) ◽  
pp. 3586-3586
Author(s):  
Daxton Hawks ◽  
Tracianne B. Neilsen ◽  
Kent L. Gee ◽  
Scott D. Sommerfeldt

2018 ◽  
Vol 143 (2) ◽  
pp. EL81-EL86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph S. Lawrence ◽  
Eric B. Whiting ◽  
Kent L. Gee ◽  
Reese D. Rasband ◽  
Tracianne B. Neilsen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 141 (5) ◽  
pp. 3796-3796
Author(s):  
Kelli Succo ◽  
Scott D. Sommerfeldt ◽  
Kent L. Gee ◽  
Tracianne B. Neilsen

Author(s):  
Hejie Lin ◽  
Turgay Bengisu ◽  
Zissimos P. Mourelatos

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (01) ◽  
pp. 1850050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daipei Liu ◽  
Steffen Marburg ◽  
Christian Geweth ◽  
Nicole Kessissoglou

In this work, numerical methods to identify the surface areas of a vibrating structure that radiate sound are implemented for cases of structures with inhomogeneous distributions of viscous Rayleigh damping. The intensity-based techniques correspond to acoustic intensity evaluated in terms of the acoustic pressure and particle velocity, non-negative intensity evaluated in terms of the acoustic impedance matrix obtained at the structural surface, and back-calculated non-negative intensity evaluated in terms of the acoustic impedance matrix obtained at a far-field receiver surface. Different configurations of inhomogeneous damping are applied to two elastic structures corresponding to a plate and a cylindrical shell. To examine the influence of inhomogeneous damping on sound radiation, the acoustic intensity on the structural surface, the acoustic intensity on several different far-field receiver surfaces, non-negative intensity and back-calculated non-negative intensity are numerically compared for different inhomogeneous damping cases.


1999 ◽  
Vol 173 ◽  
pp. 185-188
Author(s):  
Gy. Szabó ◽  
K. Sárneczky ◽  
L.L. Kiss

AbstractA widely used tool in studying quasi-monoperiodic processes is the O–C diagram. This paper deals with the application of this diagram in minor planet studies. The main difference between our approach and the classical O–C diagram is that we transform the epoch (=time) dependence into the geocentric longitude domain. We outline a rotation modelling using this modified O–C and illustrate the abilities with detailed error analysis. The primary assumption, that the monotonity and the shape of this diagram is (almost) independent of the geometry of the asteroids is discussed and tested. The monotonity enables an unambiguous distinction between the prograde and retrograde rotation, thus the four-fold (or in some cases the two-fold) ambiguities can be avoided. This turned out to be the main advantage of the O–C examination. As an extension to the theoretical work, we present some preliminary results on 1727 Mette based on new CCD observations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document