Doppler spectral moments of multibeam echosounder data to infer the ascent velocity of methane bubbles emanating from natural seafloor seeps

2016 ◽  
Vol 140 (4) ◽  
pp. 3284-3284
Author(s):  
Christian de Moustier
2021 ◽  
Vol 180 ◽  
pp. 108107
Author(s):  
Guillaume Fromant ◽  
Nicolas Le Dantec ◽  
Yannick Perrot ◽  
France Floc'h ◽  
Anne Lebourges-Dhaussy ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Antoine Blachet ◽  
Andreas Austeng ◽  
Joaquin Aparicio ◽  
Alan J. Hunter ◽  
Roy Edgar Hansen

Author(s):  
Peter Leo ◽  
James Spragg ◽  
Dieter Simon ◽  
Justin Lawley ◽  
Iñigo Mujika

AbstractThe aim of this study was to analyze climbing performance across two editions of a professional multistage race, and assess the influence of climb category, prior workload, and intensity measures on climbing performance in U23 and professional cyclists. Nine U23 cyclists (age 20.8±0.9 years) and 8 professional cyclists (28.1±3.2 years) participated in this study. Data were divided into four types: overall race performance, climb category, climbing performance metrics (power output, ascent velocity, speed), and workload and intensity measures. Differences in performance metrics and workload and intensity measures between groups were investigated. Power output, ascent velocity, speed were higher in professionals than U23 cyclists for Cat 1 and Cat 2 (p≤0.001–0.016). Workload and intensity measures (Worktotal, Worktotal∙km-1, Elevationgain, eTRIMP and eTRIMP∙km-1) were higher in U23 compared to professionals (p=0.002–0.014). Climbing performance metrics were significantly predicted by prior workload and intensity measures for Cat 1 and 2 (R2=0.27–0.89, p≤0.001–0.030) but not Cat 3. These findings reveal that climbing performance in professional road cycling is influenced by climb categorization as well as prior workload and intensity measures. Combined, these findings suggest that Cat 1 and 2 climbing performance could be predicted from workload and intensity measures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document