Spatial influences on change detection within complex auditory scenes

2014 ◽  
Vol 135 (4) ◽  
pp. 2279-2279
Author(s):  
Kelly Dickerson ◽  
Jeremy Gaston ◽  
Angelique Scharine
Keyword(s):  
Change Detection ◽  
Auditory Scenes

Change detection in complex auditory scenes is predicted by auditory memory, pitch perception, and years of musical training

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 585-601
Author(s):  
Christina M. Vanden Bosch der Nederlanden ◽  
Che’Renee Zaragoza ◽  
Angie Rubio-Garcia ◽  
Evan Clarkson ◽  
Joel S. Snyder
Keyword(s):  
Change Detection ◽  
Musical Training ◽  
Pitch Perception ◽  
Auditory Memory ◽  
Auditory Scenes

Electrophysiological correlates of auditory change detection and change deafness in complex auditory scenes

NeuroImage ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 75 ◽  
pp. 155-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Puschmann ◽  
Pascale Sandmann ◽  
Janina Ahrens ◽  
Jeremy Thorne ◽  
Riklef Weerda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Change Detection ◽  
Change Deafness ◽  
Auditory Change Detection ◽  
Auditory Scenes

Neural and behavioral correlates of change detection following training with complex auditory scenes

2020 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. 2466-2467
Author(s):  
Natalie J. Ball ◽  
Matthew Wisniewski ◽  
Brian D. Simpson ◽  
Eduardo Mercado
Keyword(s):  
Change Detection ◽  
Behavioral Correlates ◽  
Auditory Scenes

Broad attention to multiple individual objects may facilitate change detection with complex auditory scenes.

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (11) ◽  
pp. 1806-1817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa C. Irsik ◽  
Christina M. Vanden Bosch der Nederlanden ◽  
Joel S. Snyder
Keyword(s):  
Change Detection ◽  
Auditory Scenes ◽  
Individual Objects

Vivid Imagers Are Better at Detecting Salient Changes

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 218-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Rodway ◽  
Karen Gillies ◽  
Astrid Schepman
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Change Detection ◽  
Visual Imagery ◽  
Detection Task ◽  
Level Of Detail ◽  
Detection Accuracy ◽  
Change Detection Task ◽  
Term Change ◽  
High Level

This study examined whether individual differences in the vividness of visual imagery influenced performance on a novel long-term change detection task. Participants were presented with a sequence of pictures, with each picture and its title displayed for 17  s, and then presented with changed or unchanged versions of those pictures and asked to detect whether the picture had been changed. Cuing the retrieval of the picture's image, by presenting the picture's title before the arrival of the changed picture, facilitated change detection accuracy. This suggests that the retrieval of the picture's representation immunizes it against overwriting by the arrival of the changed picture. The high and low vividness participants did not differ in overall levels of change detection accuracy. However, in replication of Gur and Hilgard (1975) , high vividness participants were significantly more accurate at detecting salient changes to pictures compared to low vividness participants. The results suggest that vivid images are not characterised by a high level of detail and that vivid imagery enhances memory for the salient aspects of a scene but not all of the details of a scene. Possible causes of this difference, and how they may lead to an understanding of individual differences in change detection, are considered.

An attentional bias for LEGO® people using a change detection task: Are LEGO® people animate?

2016 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitchell R. P. LaPointe ◽  
Rachael Cullen ◽  
Bianca Baltaretu ◽  
Melissa Campos ◽  
Natalie Michalski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Change Detection ◽  
Attentional Bias ◽  
Detection Task ◽  
Change Detection Task
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document