Sound-localization performance with the hearing protectors

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronique Zimpfer ◽  
David Sarafian
Keyword(s):  
Sound Localization ◽  
Hearing Protectors ◽  
Localization Performance

Amount of Frequency Compression in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users Is a Poor Predictor for Audibility and Spatial Hearing

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Snandan Sharma ◽  
Waldo Nogueira ◽  
A. John van Opstal ◽  
Josef Chalupper ◽  
Lucas H. M. Mens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Speech Recognition ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Sound Localization ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Spatial Hearing ◽  
Meaningful Improvement ◽  
Frequency Compression ◽  
Knee Point ◽  
Localization Performance

Purpose Speech understanding in noise and horizontal sound localization is poor in most cochlear implant (CI) users with a hearing aid (bimodal stimulation). This study investigated the effect of static and less-extreme adaptive frequency compression in hearing aids on spatial hearing. By means of frequency compression, we aimed to restore high-frequency audibility, and thus improve sound localization and spatial speech recognition. Method Sound-detection thresholds, sound localization, and spatial speech recognition were measured in eight bimodal CI users, with and without frequency compression. We tested two compression algorithms: a static algorithm, which compressed frequencies beyond the compression knee point (160 or 480 Hz), and an adaptive algorithm, which aimed to compress only consonants leaving vowels unaffected (adaptive knee-point frequencies from 736 to 2946 Hz). Results Compression yielded a strong audibility benefit (high-frequency thresholds improved by 40 and 24 dB for static and adaptive compression, respectively), no meaningful improvement in localization performance (errors remained > 30 deg), and spatial speech recognition across all participants. Localization biases without compression (toward the hearing-aid and implant side for low- and high-frequency sounds, respectively) disappeared or reversed with compression. The audibility benefits provided to each bimodal user partially explained any individual improvements in localization performance; shifts in bias; and, for six out of eight participants, benefits in spatial speech recognition. Conclusions We speculate that limiting factors such as a persistent hearing asymmetry and mismatch in spectral overlap prevent compression in bimodal users from improving sound localization. Therefore, the benefit in spatial release from masking by compression is likely due to a shift of attention to the ear with the better signal-to-noise ratio facilitated by compression, rather than an improved spatial selectivity. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.16869485

Left-Right and Front-Back Spatial Hearing with Multiple Directional Microphone Configurations in Modern Hearing Aids

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (09) ◽  
pp. 791-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evelyne Carette ◽  
Tim Van den Bogaert ◽  
Mark Laureyns ◽  
Jan Wouters
Keyword(s):  
Sound Localization ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
Frequency Dependent ◽  
Binaural Cues ◽  
Directional Microphone ◽  
Spectral Cues ◽  
Localization Performance ◽  
Asymmetric Configuration

Background: Several studies have demonstrated negative effects of directional microphone configurations on left-right and front-back (FB) sound localization. New processing schemes, such as frequency-dependent directionality and front focus with wireless ear-to-ear communication in recent, commercial hearing aids may preserve the binaural cues necessary for left-right localization and may introduce useful spectral cues necessary for FB disambiguation. Purpose: In this study, two hearing aids with different processing schemes, which were both designed to preserve the ability to localize sounds in the horizontal plane (left-right and FB), were compared. Research Design: We compared horizontal (left-right and FB) sound localization performance of hearing aid users fitted with two types of behind-the-ear (BTE) devices. The first type of BTE device had four different programs that provided (1) no directionality, (2–3) symmetric frequency-dependent directionality, and (4) an asymmetric configuration. The second pair of BTE devices was evaluated in its omnidirectional setting. This setting automatically activates a soft forward-oriented directional scheme that mimics the pinna effect. Also, wireless communication between the hearing aids was present in this configuration (5). A broadband stimulus was used as a target signal. The directional hearing abilities of the listeners were also evaluated without hearing aids as a reference. Study Sample: A total of 12 listeners with moderate to severe hearing loss participated in this study. All were experienced hearing-aid users. As a reference, 11 listeners with normal hearing participated. Data Collection and Analysis: The participants were positioned in a 13-speaker array (left-right, –90°/+90°) or 7-speaker array (FB, 0–180°) and were asked to report the number of the loudspeaker located the closest to where the sound was perceived. The root mean square error was calculated for the left-right experiment, and the percentage of FB errors was used as a FB performance measure. Results were analyzed with repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results: For the left-right localization task, no significant differences could be proven between the unaided condition and both partial directional schemes and the omnidirectional scheme. The soft forward-oriented system and the asymmetric system did show a detrimental effect compared with the unaided condition. On average, localization was worst when users used the asymmetric condition. Analysis of the results of the FB experiment showed good performance, similar to unaided, with both the partial directional systems and the asymmetric configuration. Significantly worse performance was found with the omnidirectional and the omnidirectional soft forward-oriented BTE systems compared with the other hearing-aid systems. Conclusions: Bilaterally fitted partial directional systems preserve (part of) the binaural cues necessary for left-right localization and introduce, preserve, or enhance useful spectral cues that allow FB disambiguation. Omnidirectional systems, although good for left-right localization, do not provide the user with enough spectral information for an optimal FB localization performance.

scholarly journals Sound-localization performance of patients with single-sided deafness is not improved when listening with a bone-conduction device

2019 ◽  
Vol 372 ◽  
pp. 62-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martijn J.H. Agterberg ◽  
Ad F.M. Snik ◽  
Rens M.G. Van de Goor ◽  
Myrthe K.S. Hol ◽  
A. John Van Opstal
Keyword(s):  
Sound Localization ◽  
Bone Conduction ◽  
Localization Performance ◽  
Single Sided Deafness ◽  
Bone Conduction Device

scholarly journals Comparison of sound localization performance between virtual and real three-dimensional immersive sound field

2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dae-Gee Kang ◽  
Yukio Iwaya ◽  
Ryota Miyauchi ◽  
Yôiti Suzuki
Keyword(s):  
Sound Localization ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Sound Field ◽  
Localization Performance

Sound Localization Performance Improves After Canaloplasty in Unilateral Congenital Aural Atresia Patients

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 639-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Il Joon Moon ◽  
Hayoung Byun ◽  
Sun Hwa Jin ◽  
Seeyoun Kwon ◽  
Won-Ho Chung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sound Localization ◽  
Aural Atresia ◽  
Localization Performance ◽  
Congenital Aural Atresia

Functional reorganization of the auditory pathways (or lack thereof) in callosal agenesis is predicted by monaural sound localization performance

2010 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 601-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Paiement ◽  
François Champoux ◽  
Benoit A. Bacon ◽  
Maryse Lassonde ◽  
Boualem Mensour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sound Localization ◽  
Callosal Agenesis ◽  
Auditory Pathways ◽  
Functional Reorganization ◽  
Localization Performance

scholarly journals Age-related Hearing Loss and Ear Morphology Affect Vertical but not Horizontal Sound-Localization Performance

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 261-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rik J. Otte ◽  
Martijn J. H. Agterberg ◽  
Marc M. Van Wanrooij ◽  
Ad F. M. Snik ◽  
A. John Van Opstal
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sound Localization ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Ear Morphology ◽  
Localization Performance ◽  
Age Related Hearing Loss
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document