Foreign‐accented speech in noise.

2008 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. 2592-2592
Author(s):  
Jonathan Dalby
Keyword(s):  
Accented Speech ◽  
Speech In Noise

Intelligibility of foreign‐accented speech in noise for younger and older adults.

2009 ◽  
Vol 125 (4) ◽  
pp. 2751-2751
Author(s):  
Sarah Hargus Ferguson ◽  
Kyung Ae Keum ◽  
Allard Jongman ◽  
Joan A. Sereno
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Accented Speech ◽  
Speech In Noise

Accented Speech and Accent Addition Training

2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-12
Author(s):  
Angela N. Burda Riess
Keyword(s):  
Accented Speech

Can Behavioral Speech-In-Noise Tests Improve the Quality of Hearing Aid Fittings?

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-14
Author(s):  
Robert Moore ◽  
Susan Gordon-Hickey
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Speech Perception ◽  
Performance Test ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Speech Perception In Noise ◽  
Speech In Noise ◽  
Acceptable Noise Level ◽  
Perceptual Performance ◽  
Noise Test

The purpose of this article is to propose 4 dimensions for consideration in hearing aid fittings and 4 tests to evaluate those dimensions. The 4 dimensions and tests are (a) working memory, evaluated by the Revised Speech Perception in Noise test (Bilger, Nuetzel, & Rabinowitz, 1984); (b) performance in noise, evaluated by the Quick Speech in Noise test (QSIN; Killion, Niquette, Gudmundsen, Revit, & Banerjee, 2004); (c) acceptance of noise, evaluated by the Acceptable Noise Level test (ANL; Nabelek, Tucker, & Letowski, 1991); and (d) performance versus perception, evaluated by the Perceptual–Performance test (PPT; Saunders & Cienkowski, 2002). The authors discuss the 4 dimensions and tests in the context of improving the quality of hearing aid fittings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document