Further progress with loudness adaptation inside and outside the speech range

Sophia Boudouris; Kathleen Cross; Suzanne Boyce; Laura Kretschmer; David E. Sandman; Ernest M. Weiler

doi:10.1121/1.4744262

Further progress with loudness adaptation inside and outside the speech range

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America ◽

10.1121/1.4744262 ◽

2001 ◽

Vol 109 (5) ◽

pp. 2350-2350

Author(s):

Sophia Boudouris ◽

Kathleen Cross ◽

Suzanne Boyce ◽

Laura Kretschmer ◽

David E. Sandman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Loudness Adaptation

Download Full-text

Loudness Adaptation: Real or Illusory

British Journal of Audiology ◽

10.3109/03005368209081503 ◽

1982 ◽

Vol 16 (1) ◽

pp. 9-15 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

J. D. Hood ◽

Pauline Wade

Keyword(s):

Loudness Adaptation

Download Full-text

Loudness adaptation in listeners with noise‐induced hearing loss

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America ◽

10.1121/1.380855 ◽

1976 ◽

Vol 59 (1) ◽

pp. 225-227 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Terry L. Wiley ◽

David J. Lilly ◽

Arnold M. Small

Keyword(s):

Hearing Loss ◽

Noise Induced Hearing Loss ◽

Loudness Adaptation

Download Full-text

Ipsilateral comparison paradigm loudness adaptation: Is contrast hidden in complexity?

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America ◽

10.1121/1.415621 ◽

1996 ◽

Vol 99 (4) ◽

pp. 2491-2500 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Keith Jones ◽

Ernest M. Weiler ◽

Joel S. Warm ◽

William N. Dember ◽

David E. Sandman

Keyword(s):

Loudness Adaptation

Download Full-text

Binaural versus ipsilateral loudness adaptation: A simple relationship after all?

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America ◽

10.1121/1.415620 ◽

1996 ◽

Vol 99 (4) ◽

pp. 2491-2500

Author(s):

Robert Tannen ◽

Ernest M. Weiler ◽

Joel S. Warm ◽

William N. Dember ◽

David Sandman

Keyword(s):

Simple Relationship ◽

Loudness Adaptation

Download Full-text

Increasing-Loudness Aftereffect following Decreasing-Intensity Adaptation: Spectral Dependence in Interotic and Monotic Testing

Perception ◽

10.1068/p270473 ◽

1998 ◽

Vol 27 (4) ◽

pp. 473-482 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Anthony H Reinhardt-Rutland

Keyword(s):

Cognitive Processing ◽

Response Bias ◽

Carrier Frequency ◽

Spectral Dependence ◽

The Other ◽

Direct Processing ◽

Loudness Adaptation

Listening to decreasing intensity leads to illusory increasing loudness afterwards. Evidence suggests that this increasing-loudness aftereffect may have a sensory component concerned with dynamic localisation. This was tested by comparing the spectral dependence of monotic aftereffect (adapting and testing one ear) with the spectral dependence of interotic aftereffect (adapting one ear and testing the other ear). Existence of the proposed component implies that monotic aftereffect should be more spectrally dependent than interotic aftereffect. Three listeners were exposed to a 1 kHz adapting stimulus. From responses of “growing softer” or “growing louder” to test stimuli changing in intensity, nulls were calculated; test carrier frequencies ranged from 0.5 kHz to 2 kHz. Confirming the hypothesis, monotic aftereffect was about three times as strong as interotic aftereffect for the 1 kHz test carrier frequency, while monotic and interotic aftereffects were comparable in magnitude for test carrier frequencies below about 0.8 kHz and above about 1.2 kHz. The latter residual aftereffects are attributed to cognitive processing, perhaps concerning response bias. Sensitivity did not vary systematically across conditions; this is consistent with evidence that changing intensity entails mainly direct processing. The results cannot be attributed to the loudness adaptation elicited by steady stimuli.

Download Full-text