Speech recognition with reduced spectral cues as a function of age

2000 ◽  
Vol 107 (5) ◽  
pp. 2704-2710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurie S. Eisenberg ◽  
Robert V. Shannon ◽  
Amy Schaefer Martinez ◽  
John Wygonski ◽  
Arthur Boothroyd
1994 ◽  
Vol 95 (5) ◽  
pp. 2876-2876
Author(s):  
Robert V. Shannon ◽  
Fan‐Gang Zeng ◽  
John Wygonski ◽  
Vivek Kamath ◽  
Micheal Ekelid

2003 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. 475-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipos C. Loizou ◽  
Arunvijay Mani ◽  
Michael F. Dorman

2002 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert V. Shannon

Speech understanding with cochlear implants has improved steadily over the last 25 years, and the success of implants has provided a powerful tool for understanding speech recognition in general. Comparing speech recognition in normal-hearing listeners and in cochlear-implant listeners has revealed many important lessons about the types of information necessary for good speech recognition—and some of the lessons are surprising. This paper presents a summary of speech perception research over the last 25 years with cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners. As long as the speech is audible, even the relatively severe amplitude distortion has only a mild effect on intelligibility. Temporal cues appear to be useful for speech intelligibility only up to about 20 Hz. Whereas temporal information above 20 Hz may contribute to improved quality, it contributes little to speech understanding. In contrast, the quantity and quality of spectral information appear to be critical for speech understanding. Only four spectral "channels" of information can produce good speech understanding, but more channels are required for difficult listening situations. Speech understanding is sensitive to the placement of spectral information along the cochlea. In prosthetic devices, in which the spectral information can be delivered to any cochlear location, it is critical to present spectral information to the normal acoustic tonotopic location for that information. If there is a shift or distortion of 2 to 3 mm between frequency and cochlear place, speech recognition is decreased dramatically.


1996 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. 2829-2829
Author(s):  
Philipos C. Loizou ◽  
Michael F. Dorman

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-24
Author(s):  
Erin C. Schafer

Children who use cochlear implants experience significant difficulty hearing speech in the presence of background noise, such as in the classroom. To address these difficulties, audiologists often recommend frequency-modulated (FM) systems for children with cochlear implants. The purpose of this article is to examine current empirical research in the area of FM systems and cochlear implants. Discussion topics will include selecting the optimal type of FM receiver, benefits of binaural FM-system input, importance of DAI receiver-gain settings, and effects of speech-processor programming on speech recognition. FM systems significantly improve the signal-to-noise ratio at the child's ear through the use of three types of FM receivers: mounted speakers, desktop speakers, or direct-audio input (DAI). This discussion will aid audiologists in making evidence-based recommendations for children using cochlear implants and FM systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document