Artificial neural network processing of time‐varying loudness data to model annoyance of noise

1997 ◽  
Vol 102 (5) ◽  
pp. 3190-3191
Author(s):  
Peter C. Laux ◽  
Patricia Davies
2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 325-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya-li Zhou ◽  
Qi-zhi Zhang ◽  
Tao Zhang ◽  
Xiao-dong Li ◽  
Woon-seng Gan

In practical active noise control (ANC) systems, the primary path and the secondary path may be nonlinear and time-varying. It has been reported that the linear techniques used to control such ANC systems exhibit degradation in performance. In addition, the actuators of an ANC system very often have nonminimum-phase response. A linear controller under such situations yields poor performance. A novel functional link artificial neural network (FLANN)-based simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation (SPSA) algorithm, which functions as a nonlinear mode-free (MF) controller, is proposed in this paper. Computer simulations have been carried out to demonstrate that the proposed algorithm outperforms the standard filtered-x least mean square (FXLMS) algorithm, and performs better than the recently proposed filtered-s least mean square (FSLMS) algorithm when the secondary path is time-varying. This observation implies that the SPSA-based MF controller can eliminate the need of the modeling of the secondary path for the ANC system.


1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy E. Williams ◽  
Ronald G. Driggers ◽  
William R. Clayton ◽  
Laura Anderson ◽  
Carl E. Halford

Author(s):  
Wee-Beng Tay ◽  
Murali Damodaran ◽  
Zhi-Da Teh ◽  
Rahul Halder

Abstract Investigation of applying physics informed neural networks on the test case involving flow past Converging-Diverging (CD) Nozzle has been investigated. Both Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Physics Informed Neural Network (PINN) are used to do the training and prediction. Results show that Artificial Neural Network (ANN) by itself is already able to give relatively good prediction. With the addition of PINN, the error reduces even more, although by only a relatively small amount. This is perhaps due to the already good prediction. The effects of batch size, training iteration and number of epochs on the prediction accuracy have already been tested. It is found that increasing batch size improves the prediction. On the other hand, increasing the training iteration may give poorer prediction due to overfitting. Lastly, in general, increasing epochs reduces the error. More investigations should be done in the future to further reduce the error while at the same time using less training data. More complicated cases with time varying results should also be included. Extrapolation of the results using PINN can also be tested.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document