Multichannel cochlear implant system including wearable speech processor

1997 ◽  
Vol 102 (5) ◽  
pp. 2480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph H. Schulman
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Speech Processor ◽  
Implant System

Design for an Inexpensive but Effective Cochlear Implant

1998 ◽  
Vol 118 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blake S. Wilson ◽  
Stephen Rebscher ◽  
Fan-Gang Zeng ◽  
Robert V. Shannon ◽  
Gerald E. Loeb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
High Reliability ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Electrode Array ◽  
Sampling Strategy ◽  
Prototype System ◽  
Widespread Application ◽  
Speech Processor ◽  
Monopolar Electrodes ◽  
Implant System

Widespread application of cochlear implants is limited by cost, especially in developing countries. In this article we present a design for a low-cost but effective cochlear implant system. The system includes a speech processor, four pairs of transmitting and receiving coils, and an electrode array with four monopolar electrodes. All implanted components are passive, reducing to a minimum the complexity of manufacture and allowing high reliability. A four-channel continuous interleaved sampling strategy is used for the speech processor. The processor and transmission link have been evaluated in tests with a subject previously implanted with the Ineraid electrode array and percutaneous connector. A prototype of the link, consisting of four pairs of transmitting and external receiving coils, was used, with the outputs of the receiving coils directed to four intracochlear electrodes through the percutaneous connector. The subject achieved speech reception scores with the prototype system that were equivalent to those achieved with a standard laboratory implementation of a continuous interleaved sampling processor with current-controlled stimuli.

Using Evoked Compound Action Potentials to Assess Activation of Electrodes and Predict C-Levels in the Tempo+ Cochlear Implant Speech Processor

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isaac Alvarez ◽  
Angel de la Torre ◽  
Manuel Sainz ◽  
Cristina Roldán ◽  
Hansjoerg Schoesser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Action Potentials ◽  
Speech Processor ◽  
Compound Action Potentials ◽  
Compound Action

Effect of Speech Processor Program Modifications on Cochlear Implant Recipients’ Threshold and Maximum Acceptable Loudness Levels

1999 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Sun ◽  
Margarate W. Skinner ◽  
S. Y. Liu ◽  
T. S. Huang
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Everyday Life ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Active Electrode ◽  
Speech Processor ◽  
Significant Change ◽  
Upper Boundary

This study’s purpose was to determine whether or not modifications in speech processor electrical stimulation levels were associated with changes in five Nucleus 22 cochlear implant recipients’ thresholds or maximum acceptable loudness levels (MALs). These modifications in minimum and maximum stimulation levels were made to optimize hearing in everyday life. One threshold and one MAL were obtained on each active electrode during six, weekly test sessions, three before and three after program modification. Only one participant had a significant change in threshold after program modification; this participant and four others had significant changes in MAL. Participants’ threshold variability was the same, but MAL variability was higher than that observed in other studies. Because these participants had no experience making MAL judgments prior to this study, this result suggests that implant recipients should be given sufficient practice in making MAL judgments to provide a stable clinical estimate of the upper boundary of the electrical dynamic range.

scholarly journals Comparison of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Thresholds and Loudness Estimates for the Stimuli Used to Program the Advanced Bionics Cochlear Implant

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (01) ◽  
pp. 016-027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun Kyung Jeon ◽  
Carolyn J. Brown ◽  
Christine P. Etler ◽  
Sara O'Brien ◽  
Li-Kuei Chiou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Compound Action Potential ◽  
Behavioral Measures ◽  
Speech Processor ◽  
Compound Action Potentials ◽  
Evoked Compound Action Potential ◽  
The Individual ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Compound Action

Background: In the mid-1990s, Cochlear Corporation introduced a cochlear implant (CI) to the market that was equipped with hardware that made it possible to record electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) from CI users of all ages. Over the course of the next decade, many studies were published that compared ECAP thresholds with levels used to program the speech processor of the Nucleus CI. In 2001 Advanced Bionics Corporation introduced the Clarion CII cochlear implant (the Clarion CII internal device is also known as the CII Bionic Ear). This cochlear implant was also equipped with a system that allowed measurement of the ECAP. While a great deal is known about how ECAP thresholds compare with the levels used to program the speech processor of the Nucleus CI, relatively few studies have reported comparisons between ECAP thresholds and the levels used to program the speech processor of the Advanced Bionics CI. Purpose: To explore the relationship between ECAP thresholds and behavioral measures of perceptual dynamic range for the range of stimuli commonly used to program the speech processor of the Advanced Bionics CI. Research Design: This prospective and experimental study uses correlational and descriptive statistics to define the relationship between ECAP thresholds and perceptual dynamic range measures. Study Sample: Twelve postlingually deafened adults participated in this study. All were experienced users of the Advanced Bionics CI system. Data Collection and Analysis: ECAP thresholds were recorded using the commercially available SoundWave software. Perceptual measures of threshold (T-level), most comfortable level (M-level), and maximum comfortable level (C-level) were obtained using both “tone bursts” and “speech bursts.” The relationship between these perceptual and electrophysiological variables was defined using paired t-tests as well as correlation and linear regression. Results: ECAP thresholds were significantly correlated with the perceptual dynamic range measures studied; however, correlations were not strong. Analysis of the individual data revealed considerable discrepancy between the contour of ECAP threshold versus electrode function and the behavioral loudness estimates used for programming. Conclusion: ECAP thresholds recorded from Advanced Bionics cochlear implant users always indicated levels where the programming stimulus was audible for the listener. However, the correlation between ECAP thresholds and M-levels (the primary metric used to program the speech processor of the Advanced Bionics CI), while statistically significant, was quite modest. If programming levels are to be determined on the basis of ECAP thresholds, care should be taken to ensure that stimulation is not uncomfortably loud, particularly on the basal electrodes in the array.

Handling of the TEMPO+ behind-the-ear speech processor by MED-EL cochlear implant users

2003 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 110-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilona Anderson ◽  
Marcus Schmidt ◽  
Thomas Buchreiter ◽  
Kristin Bisanar
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Speech Processor

scholarly journals Objective and subjective evaluations of the Nurotron Venus cochlear implant system via animal experiments and clinical trials

2015 ◽  
Vol 136 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Na Gao ◽  
Xin-Da Xu ◽  
Fang-Lu Chi ◽  
Fan-Gang Zeng ◽  
Qian-Jie Fu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Animal Experiments ◽  
Subjective Evaluations ◽  
Implant System

scholarly journals Launching of a cochlear implant program at the Cracow Otolaryngology Clinic

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Maciej Wiatr ◽  
Kazimierz Niemczyk ◽  
Jacek Składzień ◽  
Agnieszka Wiatr
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Inner Ear ◽  
Bone Conduction ◽  
Acoustic Trauma ◽  
Sensory Cells ◽  
Hearing Disorders ◽  
Speech Processor ◽  
External Part ◽  
The Right ◽  
Specialist Center

Introduction: It is estimated that hearing impediment affects approximately 12% of the population. Some forms of hearing disorders can be successfully treated conservatively, while in others surgery plays a key role. Often, therapeutic methods are exhausted and the patient faces the decision about the need for acoustic organ prosthesis. Depending on the causes of anomalies, apparatus for air conduction, bone conduction or cochlear implants are used. A cochlear implant replaces the damaged sensory cells of the inner ear. It constitutes an electronic prosthesis of the acoustic organ, composed of two parts. The internal part (implanted in the inner ear) consists of an implant and electrodes, which conduct electrical signals to the cochlea. The external part consists of a microphone, a speech processor, and a transmitter. Care report: A 70-year-old patient with deep hearing loss in the right ear and deafness of the left ear. During the interview, the patient denied mechanical injuries of the head and neck, acoustic trauma, inflammation or otorrhea. Based on the conducted tests, qualification otolaryngology, audiology, and otoneurology, radiology, surdologopedy and psychology were performed for cochlear implant insertion. The patient was qualified for cochlear implantation in the left ear under general anesthesia. The surgical team was composed of dr hab. Maciej Wiatr, prof. dr hab. Kazimierz Niemczyk, prof. dr hab. Jacek Składzień, MD Agnieszka Wiatr with anesthetic monitoring under the supervision of MD Renata Witkowska. The patient was discharged home on day 7 after surgery in good general and local condition. Simultaneous rehabilitation was started at the Center for Daily Rehabilitation of Hearing and Speech at the Specialist Center of Diagnosis and Rehabilitation for Children and Adolescents with Hearing Disabilities of the Polish Association of the Deaf in Cracow.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document