Medial efferent inhibition produces the largest equivalent attenuations at moderate to high sound levels in cat auditory‐nerve fibers

1996 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 1680-1690 ◽  
Author(s):  
John J. Guinan ◽  
Konstantina M. Stankovic
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Nerve ◽  
Nerve Fibers ◽  
Efferent Inhibition ◽  
Sound Levels ◽  
Auditory Nerve Fibers ◽  
High Sound

Neural encoding of single-formant stimuli in the cat. I. Responses of auditory nerve fibers

1993 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 1054-1075 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Wang ◽  
M. B. Sachs
Keyword(s):  
Direct Current ◽  
Auditory Nerve ◽  
Nerve Fibers ◽  
Fundamental Component ◽  
Sound Levels ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Spectral Components ◽  
Auditory Nerve Fibers ◽  
High Sound ◽  
Envelope Modulation

1. We have studied auditory responses to a set of speech-related narrowband sounds, single-formant stimuli (SFSs), in populations of auditory nerve fibers (ANFs). An analytic method was developed to extract the envelope of temporal discharge patterns of the ANF responses to nonsinusoidally modulated stimuli, whose spectra have multiple clusters of components. Such responses are often encountered in the auditory system when complex stimuli are used and have traditionally been studied by analyzing the fundamental component of the responses. 2. The envelope modulation in the SFSs is shown to be represented by the response patterns of ANFs. When the whole ANF population is considered, the information on modulation in stimulus envelope does not disappear at the highest sound level tested at all best frequencies (BFs) we studied (1-10 kHz). The representation is the best at medium sound levels and degrades at high sound levels. Low/medium-spontaneous rate (SR) ANFs showed greater envelope modulation in their responses at high sound levels than do high-SR ANFs. The quality of the representation at high sound levels is, on average, proportional to BF threshold of an ANF. On the basis of populations of ANFs with all SRs, the envelope modulation in the SFSs is represented over a wide range of sound levels. 3. We found that low-BF ANFs differ from high-BF ANFs in representing envelope modulation in the SFSs. For ANFs with BFs less than approximately 6 kHz, information on stimulus envelope is not only contained in spectral components near direct current but also in components at the vicinities of frequencies equal to BF and its multiples. In fact, for ANFs with BFs < 3 kHz, the contribution from spectral components centered at BF to overall response modulation is greater than that from spectral components near direct current. These findings indicate that, by using measures solely based on the fundamental component, the amount of modulation in the responses to narrowband stimuli is underestimated for low-BF ANFs. 4. Off-BF stimulation of ANFs with SFSs was found to result in increased envelope modulation in responses at high sound levels. The further away the stimulus is centered relative to unit BF, the greater the modulation it induces, provided that the stimulus is capable of exciting the unit. An SFS centered as close as 15% off unit BF can produce a significant increase in the modulation of responses at very high sound levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Biomechanics of Hearing Sensitivity

1991 ◽  
Vol 113 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sir James Lighthill
Keyword(s):  
Hair Cells ◽  
Auditory Nerve ◽  
Basilar Membrane ◽  
Nerve Fibers ◽  
Outer Hair Cells ◽  
Hearing Sensitivity ◽  
Sound Levels ◽  
Auditory Nerve Fibers ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Stiffness Distribution

This survey lecture on the biomechanics of hearing sensitivity is concerned, not with how the brain in man and other mammals analyzes the data coming to it along auditory nerve fibers, but with the initial capture of that data in the cochlea. The brain, needless to say, can produce all its miracles of interpretation only where it works on good initial data. For frequency selectivity these depend on some remarkable properties of the cochlea as a passive macromechanical system, comprising the basilar membrane with its steeply graded stiffness distribution vibrating within the cochlear fluids. But the biomechanics of hearing sensitivity to low levels of sound (at any particular frequency) calls also into play an active micromechanical system, which during the past few years has progressively been identified as located in the outer hair cells, and which, through a process of positive feedback, amplifies (in healthy ears) that basilar membrane vibration. This in turn offers the inner hair cells an enhanced signal at low sound levels, so that the threshold at which they can generate activity in auditory nerve fibers is, in consequence, very substantially lowered.

Responses of auditory‐nerve fibers to multiple‐tone complexes

1987 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 1989-2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Deng ◽  
C. Daniel Geisler ◽  
Steven Greenberg
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Nerve ◽  
Nerve Fibers ◽  
Auditory Nerve Fibers

Encoding timing and intensity in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the cat

1986 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 261-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. S. Rhode ◽  
P. H. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Firing Rate ◽  
Cochlear Nucleus ◽  
Auditory Nerve ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Nerve Fibers ◽  
Frequency Selectivity ◽  
Firing Rates ◽  
Ventral Cochlear Nucleus ◽  
Auditory Nerve Fibers ◽  
Different Cell Types

Physiological response properties of neurons in the ventral cochlear nucleus have a variety of features that are substantially different from the stereotypical auditory nerve responses that serve as the principal source of activation for these neurons. These emergent features are the result of the varying distribution of auditory nerve inputs on the soma and dendrites of the various cell types within the nucleus; the intrinsic membrane characteristics of the various cell types causing different responses to the same input in different cell types; and secondary excitatory and inhibitory inputs to different cell types. Well-isolated units were recorded with high-impedance glass microelectrodes, both intracellularly and extracellularly. Units were characterized by their temporal response to short tones, rate vs. intensity relation, and response areas. The principal response patterns were onset, chopper, and primary-like. Onset units are characterized by a well-timed first spike in response to tones at the characteristic frequency. For frequencies less than 1 kHz, onset units can entrain to the stimulus frequency with greater precision than their auditory nerve inputs. This implies that onset units receive converging inputs from a number of auditory nerve fibers. Onset units are divided into three subcategories, OC, OL, and OI. OC units have extraordinarily wide dynamic ranges and low-frequency selectivity. Some are capable of sustaining firing rates of 800 spikes/s at high intensities. They have the smallest standard deviation and coefficient of variation of the first spike latency of any cells in the cochlear nuclei. OC units are candidates for encoding intensity. OI and OL units differ from OC units in that they have dynamic ranges and frequency selectivity ranges much like those of auditory nerve fibers. They differ from one another in their steady-state firing rates; OI units fire mainly at the onset of a tone. OI units also differ from OL units in that they prefer frequency sweeps in the low to high direction. Primary-like-with-notch (PLN) units also respond to tones with a well-timed first spike. They differ from onset cells in that the onset peak is not always as precise as the spontaneous rate is higher. A comparison of spontaneous firing rate and saturation firing rate of PLN units with auditory nerve fibers suggest that PLN units receive one to four auditory nerve fiber inputs. Chopper units fire in a sustained regular manner when they are excited by sound.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Frequency Tuning and Spontaneous Activity in the Auditory Nerve and Cochlear Nucleus Magnocellularis of the Barn Owl Tyto alba

1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 364-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Köppl
Keyword(s):  
Response Latency ◽  
Cochlear Nucleus ◽  
Auditory Nerve ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Barn Owl ◽  
Nerve Fibers ◽  
Spontaneous Discharge ◽  
Tyto Alba ◽  
Nucleus Magnocellularis ◽  
Auditory Nerve Fibers

Köppl, Christine. Frequency tuning and spontaneous activity in the auditory nerve and cochlear nucleus magnocellularis of the barn owl Tyto alba. J. Neurophysiol. 77: 364–377, 1997. Single-unit recordings were obtained from the brain stem of the barn owl at the level of entrance of the auditory nerve. Auditory nerve and nucleus magnocellularis units were distinguished by physiological criteria, with the use of the response latency to clicks, the spontaneous discharge rate, and the pattern of characteristic frequencies encountered along an electrode track. The response latency to click stimulation decreased in a logarithmic fashion with increasing characteristic frequency for both auditory nerve and nucleus magnocellularis units. The average difference between these populations was 0.4–0.55 ms. The most sensitive thresholds were ∼0 dB SPL and varied little between 0.5 and 9 kHz. Frequency-threshold curves showed the simple V shape that is typical for birds, with no indication of a low-frequency tail. Frequency selectivity increased in a gradual, power-law fashion with increasing characteristic frequency. There was no reflection of the unusual and greatly expanded mapping of higher frequencies on the basilar papilla of the owl. This observation is contrary to the equal-distance hypothesis that relates frequency selectivity to the spatial respresentation in the cochlea. On the basis of spontaneous rates and/or sensitivity there was no evidence for distinct subpopulations of auditory nerve fibers, such as the well-known type I afferent response classes in mammals. On the whole, barn owl auditory nerve physiology conformed entirely to the typical patterns seen in other bird species. The only exception was a remarkably small spread of thresholds at any one frequency, this being only 10–15 dB in individual owls. Average spontaneous rate was 72.2 spikes/s in the auditory nerve and 219.4 spikes/s for nucleus magnocellularis. This large difference, together with the known properties of endbulb-of-Held synapses, suggests a convergence of ∼2–4 auditory nerve fibers onto one nucleus magnocellularis neuron. Some auditory nerve fibers as well as nucleus magnocellularis units showed a quasiperiodic spontaneous discharge with preferred intervals in the time-interval histogram. This phenomenon was observed at frequencies as high as 4.7 kHz.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document