Effect of masker level on overshoot in running‐ and frozen‐noise maskers

1994 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 2192-2201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regine von Klitzing ◽  
Armin Kohlrausch
Keyword(s):  
Masker Level ◽  
Frozen Noise

scholarly journals High Ripple-Density Resolution for Discriminating Between Rippled and Nonrippled Signals: Effect of Temporal Processing or Combination Products?

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 233121652110101
Author(s):  
Dmitry I. Nechaev ◽  
Olga N. Milekhina ◽  
Marina S. Tomozova ◽  
Alexander Y. Supin
Keyword(s):  
Low Frequency ◽  
Noise Signal ◽  
Density Variation ◽  
Choice Procedure ◽  
Masker Level ◽  
Reference Signals ◽  
Forced Choice Procedure ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Density Resolution

The goal of the study was to investigate the role of combination products in the higher ripple-density resolution estimates obtained by discrimination between a spectrally rippled and a nonrippled noise signal than that obtained by discrimination between two rippled signals. To attain this goal, a noise band was used to mask the frequency band of expected low-frequency combination products. A three-alternative forced-choice procedure with adaptive ripple-density variation was used. The mean background (unmasked) ripple-density resolution was 9.8 ripples/oct for rippled reference signals and 21.8 ripples/oct for nonrippled reference signals. Low-frequency maskers reduced the ripple-density resolution. For masker levels from −10 to 10 dB re. signal, the ripple-density resolution for nonrippled reference signals was approximately twice as high as that for rippled reference signals. At a masker level as high as 20 dB re. signal, the ripple-density resolution decreased in both discrimination tasks. This result leads to the conclusion that low-frequency combination products are not responsible for the task-dependent difference in ripple-density resolution estimates.

Loudness Growth under Masking: Relation to True Sensorineural Impairment

1973 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 597-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan M. Richards
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Power Function ◽  
Threshold Shift ◽  
Essential Difference ◽  
Frequency Dependent ◽  
Masker Level ◽  
Loudness Recruitment ◽  
The Family ◽  
Balance Functions ◽  
Loudness Growth

Alternate binaural loudness balances between masked and unmasked normal ears were performed to examine the growth of loudness as a function of masker level at each of several frequencies (500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz) and to determine whether the recruitmentlike phenomenon in masked ears is comparable in its growth and form to actual recruitment growth in sensorineural impaired ears. The results for 28 subjects indicated that for all frequencies a power function relating the perceived loudness in the masked ear to the unmasked ear could be drawn, and that the slope of this function rose as a function of increased masking. The family of slopes for each frequency was linearly related to the induced threshold shift. The slope of this latter relation proved to be frequency dependent. Comparison between the slope growth in simulated hearing loss and the family of loudness-balance slopes obtained from patients with true unilateral loss of varying degree indicated that the slopes of loudness-balance functions in the latter group also increased linearly with increased loss. In this latter instance, however, the slope growth was not frequency dependent, thus pointing to an essential difference between simulated and actual loudness recruitment growth.

scholarly journals Effects of target phase in narrow‐band frozen noise detection data

1987 ◽  
Vol 82 (S1) ◽  
pp. S109-S109 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. Isabelle ◽  
H. S. Colburn
Keyword(s):  
Narrow Band ◽  
Noise Detection ◽  
Frozen Noise

Masking by modulated and unmodulated noise: Effects of bandwidth, modulation rate, signal frequency, and masker level

1997 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 1600-1610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sid P. Bacon ◽  
Jungmee Lee ◽  
Daniel N. Peterson ◽  
Dawne Rainey
Keyword(s):  
Signal Frequency ◽  
Noise Effects ◽  
Masker Level ◽  
Modulation Rate
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document