Spectral integration in vowel perception: Matching and discrimination studies

Keith Johnson; Marisa Fernandez; Michael Henninger; Jim Sandstrum

doi:10.1121/1.404679

Spectral integration in vowel perception: Matching and discrimination studies

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America ◽

10.1121/1.404679 ◽

1992 ◽

Vol 92 (4) ◽

pp. 2414-2414

Author(s):

Keith Johnson ◽

Marisa Fernandez ◽

Michael Henninger ◽

Jim Sandstrum

Keyword(s):

Vowel Perception ◽

Spectral Integration

Download Full-text

Distinctiveness and Assimilation in Vowel Perception in a Second Language

Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research ◽

10.1044/2019_jslhr-h-19-0074 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 62 (12) ◽

pp. 4534-4543

Author(s):

Wei Hu ◽

Sha Tao ◽

Mingshuang Li ◽

Chang Liu

Keyword(s):

Second Language ◽

Native Language ◽

Vowel Identification ◽

Vowel Perception ◽

Perceptual Distance ◽

Vowel Space ◽

English Vowels ◽

Chinese Counterpart ◽

Vowel Categories

Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate how the distinctive establishment of 2nd language (L2) vowel categories (e.g., how distinctively an L2 vowel is established from nearby L2 vowels and from the native language counterpart in the 1st formant [F1] × 2nd formant [F2] vowel space) affected L2 vowel perception. Method Identification of 12 natural English monophthongs, and categorization and rating of synthetic English vowels /i/ and /ɪ/ in the F1 × F2 space were measured for Chinese-native (CN) and English-native (EN) listeners. CN listeners were also examined with categorization and rating of Chinese vowels in the F1 × F2 space. Results As expected, EN listeners significantly outperformed CN listeners in English vowel identification. Whereas EN listeners showed distinctive establishment of 2 English vowels, CN listeners had multiple patterns of L2 vowel establishment: both, 1, or neither established. Moreover, CN listeners' English vowel perception was significantly related to the perceptual distance between the English vowel and its Chinese counterpart, and the perceptual distance between the adjacent English vowels. Conclusions L2 vowel perception relied on listeners' capacity to distinctively establish L2 vowel categories that were distant from the nearby L2 vowels.

Download Full-text

Temporal Characteristics of Speech in Simultaneous Communication

Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research ◽

10.1044/jshr.3805.1014 ◽

1995 ◽

Vol 38 (5) ◽

pp. 1014-1024 ◽

Cited By ~ 26

Author(s):

Robert L. Whitehead ◽

Nicholas Schiavetti ◽

Brenda H. Whitehead ◽

Dale Evan Metz

Keyword(s):

Pause Duration ◽

Vowel Duration ◽

Vowel Perception ◽

Temporal Characteristics ◽

Spoken English ◽

Temporal Features ◽

Before And After ◽

Word Duration ◽

Rate Of Speech ◽

Speech Condition

The purpose of this investigation was twofold: (a) to determine if there are changes in specific temporal characteristics of speech that occur during simultaneous communication, and (b) to determine if known temporal rules of spoken English are disrupted during simultaneous communication. Ten speakers uttered sentences consisting of a carrier phrase and experimental CVC words under conditions of: (a) speech, (b) speech combined with signed English, and (c) speech combined with signed English for every word except the CVC word that was fingerspelled. The temporal features investigated included: (a) sentence duration, (b) experimental CVC word duration, (c) vowel duration in experimental CVC words, (d) pause duration before and after experimental CVC words, and (e) consonantal effects on vowel duration. Results indicated that for all durational measures, the speech/sign/fingerspelling condition was longest, followed by the speech/sign condition, with the speech condition being shortest. It was also found that for all three speaking conditions, vowels were longer in duration when preceding voiced consonants than vowels preceding their voiceless cognates, and that a low vowel was longer in duration than a high vowel. These findings indicate that speakers consistently reduced their rate of speech when using simultaneous communication, but did not violate these specific temporal rules of English important for consonant and vowel perception.

Download Full-text