Numerical evaluation of errors associated with the measurement of acoustic impedance in a free field using two microphones and a spectrum analyzer

1988 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvan Champoux ◽  
A. L’Espérance
1971 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 385-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Terhune ◽  
K. Ronald

A free-field air audiogram from 1 to 32 kHz was obtained for a Pagophilus groenlandicus trained to respond to pure tone signals. The lowest threshold was at 4 kHz at a level of 29 db//0.0002 dynes/cm2. The air audiogram was generally flat. The critical ratios at 2 and 4 kHz were 10%. The lumen of the external auditory meatus is probably acoustically blocked. The outer and (or) middle ear structures and their acoustic impedance mismatch with the air are believed responsible for the comparatively irregular and slightly insensitive hearing of the seal in air.


1988 ◽  
Vol 125 (2) ◽  
pp. 313-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Champoux ◽  
J. Nicolas ◽  
J.F. Allard

2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 745-757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica M. Wess ◽  
Joshua G. W. Bernstein

PurposeFor listeners with single-sided deafness, a cochlear implant (CI) can improve speech understanding by giving the listener access to the ear with the better target-to-masker ratio (TMR; head shadow) or by providing interaural difference cues to facilitate the perceptual separation of concurrent talkers (squelch). CI simulations presented to listeners with normal hearing examined how these benefits could be affected by interaural differences in loudness growth in a speech-on-speech masking task.MethodExperiment 1 examined a target–masker spatial configuration where the vocoded ear had a poorer TMR than the nonvocoded ear. Experiment 2 examined the reverse configuration. Generic head-related transfer functions simulated free-field listening. Compression or expansion was applied independently to each vocoder channel (power-law exponents: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, or 2).ResultsCompression reduced the benefit provided by the vocoder ear in both experiments. There was some evidence that expansion increased squelch in Experiment 1 but reduced the benefit in Experiment 2 where the vocoder ear provided a combination of head-shadow and squelch benefits.ConclusionsThe effects of compression and expansion are interpreted in terms of envelope distortion and changes in the vocoded-ear TMR (for head shadow) or changes in perceived target–masker spatial separation (for squelch). The compression parameter is a candidate for clinical optimization to improve single-sided deafness CI outcomes.


1978 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-308
Author(s):  
Terry L. Wiley ◽  
Raymond S. Karlovich

Contralateral acoustic-reflex measurements were taken for 10 normal-hearing subjects using a pulsed broadband noise as the reflex-activating signal. Acoustic impedance was measured at selected times during the on (response maximum) and off (response minimum) portions of the pulsed activator over a 2-min interval as a function of activator period and duty cycle. Major findings were that response maxima increased as a function of time for longer duty cycles and that response minima increased as a function of time for all duty cycles. It is hypothesized that these findings are attributable to the recovery characteristics of the stapedius muscle. An explanation of portions of the results from previous temporary threshold shift experiments on the basis of acoustic-reflex dynamics is proposed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document