Further evaluation of the effects of training, head movement, elevation, and azimuth on sound localization in monaural and binaural humans

1981 ◽  
Vol 69 (S1) ◽  
pp. S63-S64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul J. Russell ◽  
R. Wayne Gatehouse
Keyword(s):  
Sound Localization ◽  
Head Movement

scholarly journals Effects of head movement on front-back error in sound localization

2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 322-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukio Iwaya ◽  
Yôiti Suzuki ◽  
Daisuke Kimura
Keyword(s):  
Sound Localization ◽  
Head Movement

Head movement in human sound localization

2016 ◽  
Vol 140 (4) ◽  
pp. 2998-2998
Author(s):  
Hayato Sato ◽  
Masayuki Morimoto ◽  
Hiroshi Sato
Keyword(s):  
Sound Localization ◽  
Head Movement

scholarly journals The Effects of Head Movement and Accurate Proprioceptive Feedback in Training of Sound Localization

i-Perception ◽  
10.1068/ic865 ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (8) ◽  
pp. 865-865
Author(s):  
Akio Honda ◽  
Hiroshi Shibata ◽  
Souta Hidaka ◽  
Jiro Gyoba ◽  
Yukio Iwaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sound Localization ◽  
Head Movement ◽  
Proprioceptive Feedback

scholarly journals Effects of Head Movement and Proprioceptive Feedback in Training of Sound Localization

i-Perception ◽  
10.1068/i0522 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 253-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akio Honda ◽  
Hiroshi Shibata ◽  
Souta Hidaka ◽  
Jiro Gyoba ◽  
Yukio Iwaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sound Localization ◽  
Head Movement ◽  
Proprioceptive Feedback

scholarly journals Dynamic sound field audiometry: static and dynamic spatial hearing tests in the full horizontal plane

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Fischer ◽  
M. Kompis ◽  
G. Mantokoudis ◽  
M. Caversaccio ◽  
W. Wimmer
Keyword(s):  
Sound Localization ◽  
Head Movement ◽  
Discrimination Performance ◽  
Sound Field ◽  
Spatial Hearing ◽  
Tracking Performance ◽  
Tracking Errors ◽  
Static Test ◽  
Gaze Detection ◽  
Static And Dynamic Tests

ABSTRACTAlthough spatial hearing is of great importance in everyday life, today’s routine audiological test batteries and static test setups assess sound localization, discrimination and tracking abilities rudimentarily and thus provide only a limited interpretation of treatment outcomes regarding spatial hearing performance. To address this limitation, we designed a dynamic sound field test setup and evaluated the sound localization, discrimination and tracking performance of 12 normal-hearing subjects. During testing, participants provided feedback either through a touchpad or through eye tracking. In addition, the influence of head movement on sound-tracking performance was investigated. Our results show that tracking and discrimination performance was significantly better in the frontal azimuth than in the dorsal azimuth. Particularly good performance was observed in the backward direction across localization, discrimination and tracking tests. As expected, free head movement improved sound-tracking abilities. Furthermore, feedback via gaze detection led to larger tracking errors than feedback via the touchpad. We found statistically significant correlations between the static and dynamic tests, which favor the snapshot theory for auditory motion perception.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document