Behavioral Measurement of Loudness Recruitment in the Monkey

1974 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 450-450
Author(s):  
D. B. Moody
Keyword(s):  
Loudness Recruitment ◽  
Behavioral Measurement

A pragmatist philosophy of psychological science and its implications for replication

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Gantman ◽  
Robin Gomila ◽  
Joel E. Martinez ◽  
J. Nathan Matias ◽  
Elizabeth Levy Paluck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
William James ◽  
Mental Processes ◽  
Psychological Science ◽  
Behavioral Measurement ◽  
The World ◽  
Pragmatist Philosophy

AbstractA pragmatist philosophy of psychological science offers to the direct replication debate concrete recommendations and novel benefits that are not discussed in Zwaan et al. This philosophy guides our work as field experimentalists interested in behavioral measurement. Furthermore, all psychologists can relate to its ultimate aim set out by William James: to study mental processes that provide explanations for why people behave as they do in the world.

LOUDNESS RECRUITMENT AND VERTIGO

1959 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 174???188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter Alexander
Keyword(s):  
Loudness Recruitment

Loudness Growth under Masking: Relation to True Sensorineural Impairment

1973 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 597-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan M. Richards
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Power Function ◽  
Threshold Shift ◽  
Essential Difference ◽  
Frequency Dependent ◽  
Masker Level ◽  
Loudness Recruitment ◽  
The Family ◽  
Balance Functions ◽  
Loudness Growth

Alternate binaural loudness balances between masked and unmasked normal ears were performed to examine the growth of loudness as a function of masker level at each of several frequencies (500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz) and to determine whether the recruitmentlike phenomenon in masked ears is comparable in its growth and form to actual recruitment growth in sensorineural impaired ears. The results for 28 subjects indicated that for all frequencies a power function relating the perceived loudness in the masked ear to the unmasked ear could be drawn, and that the slope of this function rose as a function of increased masking. The family of slopes for each frequency was linearly related to the induced threshold shift. The slope of this latter relation proved to be frequency dependent. Comparison between the slope growth in simulated hearing loss and the family of loudness-balance slopes obtained from patients with true unilateral loss of varying degree indicated that the slopes of loudness-balance functions in the latter group also increased linearly with increased loss. In this latter instance, however, the slope growth was not frequency dependent, thus pointing to an essential difference between simulated and actual loudness recruitment growth.

Behavioral measurement of axonal thresholds

1986 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 217-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter M. Milner ◽  
André Laferrière
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Measurement

Complete the triangulation: Quantifying differential fear conditioning with a noninterfering and sensitive behavioral measure along with self-report and physiological measures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinrui Jiang ◽  
Lauryn Burleigh ◽  
Steven G Greening
Keyword(s):  
Visual Attention ◽  
Fear Conditioning ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Behavioral Measure ◽  
Physiological Measures ◽  
Behavioral Measures ◽  
Attention Task ◽  
Significant Relationships ◽  
Behavioral Measurement ◽  
Accuracy Difference

According to the multi-component view, emotion is expressed through subjective feelings and thoughts, physiological activation, and behavioral responses. In human fear conditioning research, the former two are much more popular than the third category. One concern is that concurrent behavioral probes may interfere with the conditioning process. To allow triangulation of emotion research through simultaneous employment of subjective, physiological, and behavioral measurement, it is necessary to find behavioral measures that meet the criteria of causing no interference while being sensitive to conditioning. In this study, a basic visual attention task was examined in terms of its impact on differential fear conditioning as measured by both subjective (i.e., self-reported fear, shock estimation) and physiological (i.e., skin conductance response/SCR) expression; and its ability to detect fear conditioning indicated by a reaction time (RT) or accuracy difference between the two conditioned stimuli (CS+ vs CS-). While participants in the probe group (n = 86) completed differential fear conditioning with the behavioral task, those in the no-probe group (n = 76) underwent conditioning by itself. Based on self-reported fear, shock estimation, and SCR, both groups successfully acquired differential fear with no apparent between-group difference in the degree of conditioning. In the probe group, RT but not accuracy exhibited a difference between CS+ and CS-. These findings suggest that the selected visual attention task qualifies as a non-interfering behavioral probe and produces a sensitive measure of differential conditioning. Exploratory individual analyses also revealed significant relationships between the above measures.

scholarly journals Noise-Induced loudness recruitment and hyperacusis: Insufficient central gain in auditory cortex and amygdala

Neuroscience ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 422 ◽  
pp. 212-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly Radziwon ◽  
Benjamin D. Auerbach ◽  
Dalian Ding ◽  
Xiaopeng Liu ◽  
Guang-Di Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Cortex ◽  
Loudness Recruitment
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document